Urethral reconstruction with a 3D porous bacterial cellulose scaffold seeded with lingual keratinocytes in a rabbit model

Biomedical Materials (Bristol)

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Huang, Jian Wen ^a   Lv, Xiang Guo ^a   Li, Zhe ^b   Song, Lu Jie ^a   Feng, Chao ^a   Xie, Min Kai ^a   Li, Chao ^a   Li, Hong Bin ^a   Wang, Ji Hong ^a   Zhu, Wei Dong ^a   Chen, Shi Yan ^b   Wang, Hua Ping ^b   Xu, Yue Min ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DONGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cterial cellulose; gelatin; lingual keratinocyte; rabbit model; urethral reconstruction

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION PROCESS; GELATIN; KERATINOCYTES; MACROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; RABBIT MODELS; SMOOTH MUSCLES; THREEDIMENSIONAL (3-D);

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

CELLULOSE; GELATIN SPONGE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL ISOLATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; KERATINOCYTE; MALE; MONONUCLEAR CELL; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SMOOTH MUSCLE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE REGENERATION; URETHROGRAPHY; URETHROPLASTY; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DEVICES; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TONGUE; TRANSPLANTATION; URETHRAL STRICTURE;

CELLULOSE; GELATIN; MODELS; TISSUE;

ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULOSE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; KERATINOCYTES; MALE; POROSITY; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RABBITS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TONGUE; URETHRAL STRICTURE;

EID: 84947917701     PISSN: 17486041     EISSN: 1748605X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/5/055005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Xu Y M, Qiao Y, Sa YL, Zhang J, Fu Q and Song L J 2009 Urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft for complex strictures J. Urol. 182 1040-3
2. Xu Y M, Sa Y L, Fu Q, Zhang J, Si J M and Liu Z S 2009 Oral mucosal grafts urethroplasty for the treatment of long segmented anterior urethral strictures World J. Urol. 27 565-71
3. Xu Y M, Fu Q, Sa Y L, Zhang J, Jin C R, Si J M and Song L J 2010 Treatment of urethral strictures using lingual mucosas urethroplasty: experience of 92 cases Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 123 458-62
4. Das S K, Kumar A, Sharma G K, Pandey A K, Bansal H, Trivedi S, Dwivedi U S, Bhattacharya V and Singh P B 2009 Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures Urology 73 105-8
5. Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson B R, Risberg B and Gatenholm P 2006 Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells Biomaterials 27 2141-9
6. Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P and Risberg B 2006 In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76 431-8
7. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S and Brown R M Jr 2006 Microbial cellulose - the natural power to heal wounds Biomaterials 27 145-51
8. Sanchavanakit N, Sangrungraungroj W, Kaomongkolgit R, Banaprasert T, Pavasant P and Phisalaphong M 2006 Growth of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts on bacterial cellulose film Biotechnol. Prog. 22 1194-9
9. Scherner M, Reutter S, Klemm D, Sterner-Kock A, Guschlbauer M, Richter T, Langebartels G, Madershahian N, Wahlers T and Wippermann J 2014 In vivo application of tissue-engineered blood vessels of bacterial cellulose as small arterial substitutes: proof of concept? J. Surg. Res. 189 340-7
10. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Backdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A and Gatenholm P 2010 Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration Acta Biomater. 6 2540-7
11. Bodin A, Bharadwaj S, Wu S, Gatenholm P, Atala A and Zhang Y 2010 Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion Biomaterials 31 8889-901
12. Petersen N and Gatenholm P 2011 Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91 1277-86
13. Martinez Avila H et al 2015 Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo Biomaterials 44 122-33
14. Xing Q, Zhao F, Chen S, McNamara J, Decoster M A and Lvov Y M 2010 Porous biocompatible 3D scaffolds of cellulose microfiber/gelatin composites for cell culture Acta Biomater. 6 2132-9
15. Yang J, Lv X, Chen S, Li Z, Feng C, Wang H and Xu Y 2014 In situ fabrication of a microporous bacterial cellulose/potato starch composite scaffold with enhanced cell compatibility Cellulose 21 1823-35
16. Song L J, Xu Y M, Lazzeri M and Barbagli G 2009 Lingual mucosal grafts for anterior urethroplasty: a review BJU Int. 104 1052-6
17. Feng C, Xu Y M, Fu Q, Zhu W D and Cui L 2011 Reconstruction of 3D neourethra using lingual keratinocytes and corporal smooth muscle cells seeded acellular corporal spongiosum Tissue Eng. A 17 3011-9
18. Moreira S, Silva N B, Almeida-Lima J, Rocha H A, Medeiros S R, Alves C Jr and Gama F M 2009 BC nanofibres: in vitro study of genotoxicity and cell proliferation Toxicol. Lett. 189 235-41
19. Huang J W et al 2014 Reconstruction of penile urethra with the 3D porous bladder acellular matrix in a rabbit model Urology 84 1499-505
20. Burg K J, Holder W D Jr, Culberson C R, Beiler R J, Greene K G, Loebsack A B, Roland W D, Eiselt P, Mooney D J and Halberstadt C R 2000 Comparative study of seeding methods for three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 642-9
21. Karande T S, Ong J L and Agrawal C M 2004 Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 1728-43
22. Zhong S, Zhang Y and Lim C T 2012 Fabrication of large pores in electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for cellular infiltration: a review Tissue Eng. B 18 77-87
23. Nuininga J E, van Moerkerk H, Hanssen A, Hulsbergen C A, Oosterwijk-Wakka J, Oosterwijk E, de Gier R P, Schalken J A, van Kuppevelt T and Feitz W F 2003 Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa Eur. Urol. 44 266-71
24. Billiar K, Murray J, Laude D, Abraham G and Bachrach N 2001 Effects of carbodiimide crosslinking conditions on the physical properties of laminated intestinal submucosa J Biomed. Mater. Res. 56 101-8
25. Dorin R P, Pohl H G, De Filippo R E, Yoo J J and Atala A 2008 Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J. Urol. 26 323-6
26. Kimball J R, Nittayananta W, Klausner M, Chung W O and Dale B A 2006 Antimicrobial barrier of an in vitro oral epithelial model Arch. Oral. Biol. 51 775-83
27. Li C, Xu YM, Song LJ, Fu Q, Cui L and Yin S 2008 Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyte seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts J. Urol. 180 1538-42
28. Xie M, Song L, Wang J, Fan S, Zhang Y and Xu Y 2013 Evaluation of stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrices seeded with urothelial cells for urethra reconstruction J. Surg. Res. 184 774-81