Kombucha-synthesized bacterial cellulose: Preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1548-1557

  Zhu, Changlai ^a   Li, Feng ^a   Zhou, Xinyang ^a   Lin, Lin ^a   Zhang, Tianyi ^a  

^a NANTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; cellulose; characterization; Kampuchea; Schwann cells

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLULOSE; CHARACTERIZATION; HISTOLOGY; NEURONS; RATS; REPAIR; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; KAMPUCHEA; NATURAL BIOMATERIALS; POST-IMPLANTATION; SCHWANN CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS;

TISSUE;

CELLULOSE; BACTERIAL POLYSACCHARIDE; BIOMATERIAL; MESSENGER RNA; NERVE GROWTH FACTOR; TEA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CARBOHYDRATE SYNTHESIS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG PURITY; FERMENTED PRODUCT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; KOMBUCHA; MTT ASSAY; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; RAT; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCHWANN CELL CULTURE; TISSUE REACTION; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; IMPLANT; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SCHWANN CELL; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SYNTHESIS; TEA; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULOSE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MATERIALS TESTING; NERVE GROWTH FACTOR; POLYSACCHARIDES, BACTERIAL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RNA, MESSENGER; SCHWANN CELLS; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TEA; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84897108998     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34796     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Freier T, Montenegro R, Shan Koh H, Shoichet MS,. Chitin-based tubes for tissue engineering in the nervous system. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4624-4632. (Pubitemid 40269279)
2. Stang F, Fansa H, Wolf G, Reppin M, Keilhoff G,. Structural parameters of collagen nerve grafts influence peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 3083-3091. (Pubitemid 39647243)
3. Hsu S, Chan SH, Chiang CM, Chi-Chang Chen C, Jiang CF,. Peripheral nerve regeneration using a microporous polylactic acid asymmetric conduit in a rabbit long-gap sciatic nerve transection model. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 3764-3775.
4. Nakamura T, Inada Y, Fukuda S, Yoshitani M, Nakada A, Itoi S, Kanemaru S, Endo K, Shimizu Y,. Experimental study on the regeneration of peripheral nerve gaps through a polyglycolic acid-collagen (PGA-collagen) tube. Brain Res 2004; 1027: 18-29. (Pubitemid 39370991)
5. Yang Y, Ding F, Wu J, Hu W, Liu W, Liu J, Gu X,. Development and evaluation of silk fibroin-based nerve grafts used for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5526-5535. (Pubitemid 47610691)
6. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown RM,. Microbial cellulose-The natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 145-151. (Pubitemid 41282793)
7. Müller FA, Müller L, Hofmann I, Greil P, Wenzel MM, Staudenmaier R,. Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3955-3963. (Pubitemid 44316595)
8. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P,. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 2540-2547.
9. Wippermann J, Schumann D, Klemm D, Kosmehl H, Salehi-Gelani S, Wahlers T,. Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 592-596.
10. Novaes AB Jr, Novaes AB,. Bone formation over a TiAl6V4 (IMZ) implant placed into an extraction socket in association with membrane therapy (Gengiflex). Clin Oral Implants Res 1993; 4: 106-110.
11. Hu Y, Catchmark JM,. In-vitro biodegradability and mechanical properties of bioabsorbable bacterial cellulose incorporating cellulases. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 2835-2845.
12. Dufresne C, Farnworth E,. Tea, Kombucha, and health: A review. Food Res Int 2000; 33: 409-421. (Pubitemid 30427822)
13. Yang Y, Chen X, Ding F, Zhang P, Liu J, Gu X,. Biocompatibility evaluation of silk fibroin with peripheral nerve tissues and cells in vitro. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1643-1652. (Pubitemid 46084970)
14. Seves A, Testa G, Bonfatti AM, Dubini Paglia E, Selli E, Marcandalli B,. Characterization of native cellulose/poly (ethylene glycol) films. Macromol Mater Eng 2001; 286: 524-528.
15. Gu X, Ding F, Yang Y, Liu J,. Construction of tissue engineered nerve grafts and their application in peripheral nerve regeneration. Prog Neurobiol 2011; 93: 204-230.
16. Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux JL, Caro G, Mondragon I, Gañána P., Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr Polym 2011; 84: 96-102.
17. Zhijiang C, Chengwei H, Guang Y,. Poly (3-hydroxubutyrate-co-4- hydroxubutyrate)/bacterial cellulose composite porous scaffold: Preparation, characterization and biocompatibility evaluation. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 87: 1073-1080.
18. Hirai A, Tsuji M, Yamamoto H, Horii F,. In situ crystallization of bacterial cellulose. III. Influences of different polymeric additives on the formation of microfibrils as revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 1998; 5: 201-213. (Pubitemid 128514305)
19. Maeda H, Nakajima M, Hagiwara T, Sawaguchi T, Yano S,. Bacterial cellulose/silica hybrid fabricated by mimicking biocomposites. J Mater Sci 2006; 41: 5646-5656. (Pubitemid 44372829)
20. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL,. Native cellulose: A composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984; 223: 283-285.
21. VanderHart DL, Atalla RH,. Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid-state carbon-13 NMR. Macromolecules 1984; 17: 1465-1472.
22. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM,. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 1959; 29: 786-794.
23. Feng Y, Zhang X, Shen Y, Yoshino K, Feng W,. A mechanically strong, flexible and conductive film based on bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposite. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 87: 644-649.
24. Yang Y, Zhao W, He J, Zhao Y, Ding F, Gu X,. Nerve conduits based on immobilization of nerve growth factor onto modified chitosan by using genipin as a crosslinking agent. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011; 79: 519-525.
25. Zhang Y, Lei Y, Chang J, Li L, He B, Gu Z,. Guidance of myoblast migration on aligned electrospun PLGA nanofibrous meshes. Mater Lett 2012; 68: 218-221.
26. Shalumon KT, Sreerekha PR, Sathish D, Tamura H, Nair SV, Chennazhi KP, Jayakumar R,. Hierarchically designed electrospun tubular scaffolds for cardiovascular applications. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2011; 7: 609-620.
27. Hood B, Levene HB, Levi AD,. Transplantation of autologous Schwann cells for the repair of segmental peripheral nerve defects. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26: 1770-1774.
28. Keilhoff G, Goihl A, Stang F, Wolf G, Fansa H,. Peripheral nerve tissue engineering: Autologous Schwann cells vs. transdifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 1451-1465. (Pubitemid 44174781)
29. Kim G, Hong LY, Jung J, Kim DP, Kim H, Kim IJ, Kim JR, Ree M,. The biocompatability of mesoporous inorganic-organic hybrid resin films with ionic and hydrophilic characteristics. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2517-2525.
30. Hall S,. Nerve repair: A neurobiologist's view. J Hand Surg (British and European Volume) 2001; 26: 129-136. (Pubitemid 32279762)
31. Griesser HJ, Chatelier RC, Gengenbach TR, Johnson G, Steele JG,. Growth of human cells on plasma polymers: Putative role of amine and amide groups. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1994; 5: 531-554.
32. Lee JH, Ju YM, Lee WK, Park KD, Kim YH,. Platelet adhesion onto segmented polyurethane surfaces modified by PEO-and sulfonated PEO-containing block copolymer additives. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 314-323.