Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning During Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 205-234

  Asikainen, Henna ^a   Gijbels, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Approaches to learning; Development on approaches to learning; Higher education; Longitudinal studies; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017416193     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: the journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008010.
2. Asikainen, H. (2014). Successful learning and studying in biosciences: exploring how students conceptions of learning, approaches to learning, motivation and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment are related to study success. Doctoral dissertation. Available from E-thesis.
3. *Asikainen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Vanthournout, G., & Coertjens, L. (2014). The development of approaches to learning and perceptions of the teaching-learning environment during bachelor level studies and their relation to study success. Higher Education Studies, 4(4), 24–36. DOI: 10.5539/hes.v4n4p24.
4. Aveyard, H. (2014). Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide (3rd, [updated] ed ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
5. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.
6. *Ballantine, J. A., Duff, A., & McCourt Larres, P. (2008). Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: a longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(4), 188–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.03.001.
7. Barnett, A., Van der Pols, J., & Dobson, A. (2005). Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 215–220. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299.
8. Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(3), 266–279. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb03013.x.
9. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
10. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.
11. *Biggs, J. B., & Rihn, B. (1984). The effects of intervention on deep and surface approaches to learning. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp. 279–293). New York: Academic Press.
12. *Boulton-Lewis, G., Marton, F., Lewis, D. C., & Wilss, L. A. (2004). A longitudinal study of learning for a group of indigenous Australian university students: dissonant conceptions and strategies. Higher Education, 47(1), 91–111. DOI:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009807.00392.33.
13. Catrysse, L., Gijbels, D., Doche, V., De Maeyer, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Gommers, L. (2016). Mapping processing strategies in learning from expository text: an exploratory eye tracking study followed by a cued recall. Frontline Learning Research, 4(1). doi:10.14786/flr.v4i1.192.
14. *Chan, B., & Tang, W. (2006). Evaluating the impact of university teaching on approaches to learning of first-year hospitality students. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 41–59. DOI:10.1300/J172v06n01_03.
15. *Chen, Y., Henning, M., Yielder, J., Jones, R., Wearn, A., & Weller, J. (2015). Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students’ approaches to learning and perceived stress. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0426-y.
16. *Cleveland-Innes, M., & Emes, C. (2005). Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal, 42(2), 241–262. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.1475.
17. Coffield, F. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
18. Dahlgren, L. O. (1975). Qualitative differences in learning as a function of content-oriented guidance. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
19. * De Clercq, M., Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (2013). Chicken or the egg: longitudinal analysis of the causal dilemma between goal orientation, self-regulation and cognitive processing strategies in higher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.10.003.
20. Dinsmore, D., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: what it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 499–567. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7.
21. Dolmans, D., Loyens, S., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Science Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6.
22. *Edmunds, R., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 295–309. DOI: 10.1348/000709908X368866.
23. *English, L., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education, 13(4), 461–488. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306828.
24. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22(3), 201–204. doi:10.1007/BF00132287.
25. Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university. Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
26. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0.
27. Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009.
28. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
29. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions (1st ed., p. 89). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
30. *Fryer, L. (2016). (Latent) transitions to learning at university: a latent profile transition analysis of first-year Japanese students. Higher Education, doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0094-9.
31. *Geitz, G., Brinke, D. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behaviour: self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146–158. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.001.
32. *Gijbels, D., Coertjens, L., Vanthournout, G., Struyf, E., & Van Petegem, P. (2009). Changing students’ approaches to learning: a two-year study within a university teacher training course. Educational Studies, 35(5), 503–513. doi: 10.1080/03055690902879184.
33. *Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 483. DOI: 10.1348/00070990260377488.
34. Gustavson, K., von Soest, T., Karevold, E., & Røysamb, E. (2012). Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 918. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-918.
35. Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104. doi:10.1080/0141192032000057401.
36. *Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 489–505. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306837.
37. *Iputo, J. E. (1999). Impact of the problem-based learning curriculum on the learning styles and strategies of medical students at the University of Transkei. South African Medical Journal = Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Geneeskunde, 89(5), 550–554.
38. *Jackling, B. (2005). Analysis of the learning context, perceptions of the learning environment and approaches to learning accounting: a longitudinal study. Accounting and Finance, 45, 597–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2005.00142.x.
39. Lake, W., & Boyd, W. (2015). Is the university system in Australia producing deep thinkers? Australian Universitie's Review, 57(2), 54–59.
40. *Lietz, P., & Matthews, B. (2010). The effects of college students’ personal values on changes in learning approaches. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 65–87. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9147-6.
41. *Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2013). Challenges in analysing change in students’ approaches to learning. In D. Gijbels, V. Doche, J. Richardson & J. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education. Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 232–248). New York: Routledge.
42. Lonka, K., Olkinuora, E., & Mäkinen, J. (2004). Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 301–323. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0002-1.
43. *López, B., Esteban, P., Matero, P., Irene, P., & Rodríguez, M. (2015). Métodos centrados en el aprendizaje, estrategias y enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios = learning-centered methods, learning strategies and learning approaches in university students. Revista De Educación, 370, 229–254. DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-370-304.
44. Marton, F. (1975). On non-verbatim learning: 1. Level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 273–279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1975.tb00193.x.
45. Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning. In N. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education (pp. 32–43). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
46. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning I: outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
47. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II: outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x.
48. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), Experience of learning (pp. 39–58). Edinburg: Scottish academic press.
49. *Matthews, B. (2004). An examination of changes in the approaches to learning in a sample of sojourner students from Confucian heritage cultures (CHC) over time in a new academic environment using hierarchical linear modelling. APERA Conference 2006 28–30 November, Hong Kong.
50. McCune, V., & Entwistle, N. (2011). Cultivating the disposition to understand in 21st century university education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 303–310.
51. *Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. doi: 10.1037/a0029690.
52. *Nieminen, J., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (2004). The development of study orientations and study success in students of pharmacy. Instructional Science, 32(5), 387–417. DOI: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000044642.35553.e5.
53. *Ova, E., Bloomfield, L., & Rotem, A. (2012). Measuring students’ approaches to learning in different clinical rotations. BMC Medical Education, 2(114). DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-114.
54. Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282. doi:10.1348/000709909X476946.
55. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02305.x.
56. *Phan, H. P. (2011a). Deep processing strategies and critical thinking: developmental trajectories using latent growth analyses. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 283–294. doi:10.1080/00220671003739382.
57. *Phan, H. P. (2011b). Interrelations between self-efficacy and learning approaches: a developmental approach. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 225–246. doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.545050.
58. *Phan, H. P. (2013). Theoretical constructs that explain and enhance learning: a longitudinal examination. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 1007–1021. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.806445
59. *Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Parpala, A. (2014). Explaining university students’ strong commitment to understand through individual and contextual elements. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 31–49. DOI: 10.14786/flr.v2i1.63.
60. *Postareff, L., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments. Learning Environments Research,, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10984-015-9186-1.
61. Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 283–305. doi:10.1348/000709909X480563.
62. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education.
63. *Quinnell, R., May, E., & Peat, M. (2012). Conceptions of biology and approaches to learning of first year biology students: introducing a technique for tracking changes in learner profiles over time. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1053–1074. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.582653.
64. Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 198–217). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
65. Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
66. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 7–27. doi:10.1080/0141192052000310001.
67. Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students’ perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 867–893. doi:10.1348/000709905X69690.
68. Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 288–293. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.015.
69. Richardson, J. T. E. (2013). Research issues in evaluating learning pattern development in higher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 66–70. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.003.
70. Richardson, J. T. E. (2015). Approaches to learning or levels of processing: what did Marton and Säljö (1976a) really say? The legacy of the work of the Göteborg group in the 1970s. Interchange, 46(3), 239–269. doi:10.1007/s10780-015-9251-9.
71. *Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2007). The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 647–667. doi:10.1080/03075070701573807.
72. *Saravanamuthu, K., & Yap, C. (2014). Pedagogy to empower Chinese learners to adapt to western learning circumstances: a longitudinal case-study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(3), 361–384. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.914154.
73. Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.). (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
74. Singer, J., & Willett, J. (Eds.). (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University press.
75. *Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: III—study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233–243. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1977.tb02352.x.
76. Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Further understanding learning in higher education: a systematic review on longitudinal research using Vermunt’s learning pattern model. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
77. Vanthournout, G., Coertjens, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Assessing students’ development in learning approaches according to initial learning profiles: a person-oriented perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 33–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.08.002.
78. Vanthournout, G., Doche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). (Dis)similarities in research on learning approaches and learning patterns. In D. Gijbels, V. Doche, J. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 11–32). London: Routledge.
79. Vermunt, J. D. (1994). Inventory of learning styles in higher education. Leiden University, The Netherlands: ICLON Graduate School of Education.
80. Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning. Higher Education, 31(1), 25. doi:10.1007/BF00129106.
81. Vermunt, J., & Vermetten, Y. (2004). Patterns in student learning: relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y.
82. *Volet, S. E., Renshaw, P. D., & Tietzel, K. (1994). A short-term longitudinal investigation of cross-cultural differences in study approaches using Biggs’ SPQ questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2), 301–318. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01104.x.
83. *Vu, N. V., Van, D. V., & Lacombe, G. (1998). Thinking about student thinking: medical students’ learning processes: a comparative and longitudinal study. Academic Medicine, 73(10) cannot find doi.
84. *Walker, R., Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McDonald, F., Reynolds, J., & McMartin, A. (2010). The impact of curriculum change on health sciences first year students’ approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 38(6), 707–722. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9092-y.
85. *Ward, P. J. (2011). First year medical students’ approaches to study and their outcomes in a gross anatomy course. Clinical Anatomy, 24(1), 120–127. doi:10.1002/ca.21071.
86. *Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(2), 127–15. cannot find doi.
87. Watkins, D., & Ismail, M. (1994). Is the Asian learner a rote learner? A Malaysian perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 483–488. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1035.
88. Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., & Alexander, P. A. (1988). Learning and study strategies. New York: Academic Press.
89. *Wilding, J., & Andrews, B. (2006). Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 171–182. DOI: 10.1348/000709904X24726.
90. Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. doi:10.1080/0260293042003251770.
91. *Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: a longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol, 71 doi:10.1348/000709901158424.
92. Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: a path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 35-56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168487
93. Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2009). A cross-cultural study of online collaborative learning. Multicultural Ed & Tech Jnl, 3(1), 33–46. doi:10.1108/17504970910951138.