Erratum: Deep Processing Strategies and Critical Thinking: Developmental Trajectories Using Latent Growth Analyses (Journal of Educational Research (2011) 104:4 (283-294) (DOI: 10.1080/00220671003739382);Deep processing strategies and critical thinking: Developmental trajectories using latent growth analyses

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 283-294

  Phan, Huy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

critical thinking; deep learning approach; developmental trajectories; growth of change; latent growth curve; longitudinal study

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958806312     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2012.722039     Document Type: Erratum

References (88)

1. Akanke, A. (1998). Towards the multicultural validation of a western model of student approaches to learning. Education, 119, 37-47.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY:W. H. Freeman.
5. Beauchaine, T. P., Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2005). Mediators, moderators, and predictors of 1-year outcomes among children treated for early-onset conduct problems: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 371-388. (Pubitemid 40885088)
6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
8. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
9. Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27-39.
10. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 133-149.
11. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13. Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221. (Pubitemid 40855982)
14. Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C.,&Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuanceand achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 525-534.
15. Chan, K. (2003). Hong Kong education students' epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50. (Pubitemid 36614653)
16. Chen, C., Stevenson, H. W., Hayward, C., & Burgess, S. (1995). Culture and academic achievement: Ethnic and cross-national differences. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 9, 119-151.
17. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D. C. Health. (Original work published 1909)
18. Drew, P., & Watkins, D. (1998). Affective variables, learning approaches and academic achievement: A causal modeling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 173-188. (Pubitemid 128082077)
19. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Stycker, L. A., Fuzhong, L., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59. (Pubitemid 39518817)
21. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performances: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
22. Fenollar, P., Roman, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students' academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 873-891.
23. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192. (Pubitemid 126167446)
24. Grushka, K., McLeod, J. H.,&Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian university teacher education program. Reflective Practice, 6, 239-246.
25. Guay, F., Boivin, M., & Hodges, E. V. E. (1999). Predicting change in academic achievement: A model of peer experiences and self-system processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 105-115.
26. Hancock, G. R., & Lawrence, F. R. (2006). Using latent growth models to evaluate longitudinal change. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 171-196). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
27. Harrison, J. K., Lawson, T.,&Wortley, A. (2005).Mentoring the beginning teacher: Developing professional autonomy through critical reflection on practice. Reflective Practice, 6, 419-441.
28. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relations to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
29. Jones, A.,&Jones, D. (1996). Student orientation to independent learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 15, 83-96.
30. Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40, 99-121.
31. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 356-363.
32. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1991). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 117-128.
33. Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 395-407. (Pubitemid 128655636)
34. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K.,. .. Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 381-389.
35. Kember, D., Wong,A.,&Leung,D. Y. P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 323-343.
36. Kim, J., & Cicchetti, D. (2006). Longitudinal trajectories of self-system processes and depressive symptoms amongmaltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child Development, 77, 624-639. (Pubitemid 43736538)
37. Kish, C. K., Sheehan, J. K., Cole, K. B., Struyk, L. R., & Kinder, D. (1997). Portfolio in the classroom: A vehicle for developing reflective thinking. The High School Journal, 80, 254-260.
38. Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students' epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 243-255.
39. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Leung, D. Y. P., & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23, 61-71. (Pubitemid 37513028)
41. Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486-512.
42. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning-I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
44. McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (pp. 447-480). New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32, 3-24.
46. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47. Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 185-198. (Pubitemid 128537897)
48. Motl, R. W., Birnbaum, A. S., Kubik, M. Y., & Dishman, R. K. (2004). Naturally occurring changes in physical activity are inversely related to depressive symptoms during early adolescence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 336-342. (Pubitemid 38668401)
49. Mugler, F., & Landbeck, R. (1997). Learning in the South Pacific and phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 227-239.
50. Murray-Harvey, R. (1994). Learning styles and approaches to learning: Distinguishing between concepts and instruments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 373-388.
51. Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest.
52. Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Tach, L. M., Sampson, R. J., Taylor, A., & Matthews, C. L. (2009). The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on British children growing up in deprivation: A developmental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 45, 942-957.
53. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
54. Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
55. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353-360. (Pubitemid 127451702)
56. Pedro, J. Y. (2005). Reflection in teacher education: Exploring preservice teachers' meanings of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 6, 49-66.
57. Petress, K. (2004). Critical thinking: An extended definition. Education, 124, 461-466.
58. Phan, H. P. (2007). An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the University of the South Pacific: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 27, 789-806.
59. Phan, H. P. (2008a). Exploring epistemological beliefs and learning approaches in context: A sociocultural perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 6, 793-822.
60. Phan, H. P. (2008b). Predicting change is epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-93.
61. Phan, H. P. (2008c). Unifying different theories of learning: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. Educational Psychology, 28, 325-340.
62. Phan, H. P. (2009a). Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 155-173.
63. Phan, H. P. (2009b). Exploring students' reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology, 29, 297-313.
64. Phan, H. P. (2009c, December). The reciprocality between critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A longitudinal approach. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra, Australia.
65. Phan, H. P. (2009d). Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29, 777-799.
66. Phan, H. P., & Deo, B. (2007). The revised learning process questionnaire: A validation of a Western model of students' study approaches to the South Pacific context using confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 719-739.
67. Phan, H. P.,&Deo, B. (2008). "Revisiting" the South Pacific approaches to learning: A confirmatory factor analysis study. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 371-383.
68. Raykov, T.,&Marcoulides,G.A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education. Higher Education, 27, 449-468.
70. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
71. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
72. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Senko, C., & Miles, K. M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 561-583.
74. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 343-360. (Pubitemid 39234336)
75. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
76. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
77. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
78. Urdan, T. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students' perceptions of classroom goal structure. European Psychologist, 9, 222-231. (Pubitemid 39558100)
79. Voils, C. I., Allaire, J. C., Olsen, M. K., Steffens, D. C., Hoyle, R. H., & Bosworth, H. B. (2007). Five-year trajectories of social networks and social support in older adults with major depression. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 1110-1124. (Pubitemid 47614477)
80. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates to approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. Sternberg &L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Watkins, D., & Regmi, M. (1990). An investigation of the approach to learning of Nepalese tertiary students. Higher Education, 20, 459-469.
82. Watkins, D., Regmi, M., & Astilla, E. (1991). The Asian learner as a rote learner stereotype: Myth or reality. Educational Psychology, 11, 21-34.
83. West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 930-941.
84. Willsen, J., & Binker, A. (1993). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
85. Wilson, K. L., Smart, R. M., & Watson, R. J. (1996). Gender differences in approach to learning in first year psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 59-71. (Pubitemid 126416726)
86. Wong, N.-Y., & Watkins, D. (1998). A longitudinal study of the psychosocial environmental and learning approaches in theHongKong classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 247-254. (Pubitemid 128382426)
87. Yanchar, S. C., Slife, B. D., & Warne, R. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12, 265-281.
88. Zeegers, P. (2001).Approaches to learning in science:Alongitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115-132. (Pubitemid 33652108)