Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 267-280

  Jones, Theresa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARM MOVEMENT; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EYE MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MOTOR COMPENSATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VISUAL FIELD; CONVALESCENCE; NERVE REGENERATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; HUMANS; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 85015939082     PISSN: 1471003X     EISSN: 14710048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2017.26     Document Type: Review

References (190)

1. Gazzaniga, M. S. Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 653-659 (2005).
2. Bahnemann, M., et al. Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation. J. Neurol. 262, 316-325 (2015).
3. Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. Real-Time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4340-4345 (2003).
4. Feigin, V. L., et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology 45, 161-176 (2015).
5. Feigin, V. L., et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 383, 245-254 (2014).
6. Mayo, N. E., et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 21, 258-268 (1999).
7. Bailey, R. R., Klaesner, J. W., & Lang, C. E. Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 969-978 (2015).
8. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Mark, V. W. The functional significance of cortical reorganization and the parallel development of CI therapy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 396 (2014).
9. Nakayama, H., Jørgensen, H. S., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 852-857 (1994).
10. Levin, M. F., Kleim, J. A., & Wolf, S. L. What do motor ?recovery? and ?compensation? mean in patients following stroke?. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 313-319 (2009).
11. Jones, T. A., et al. Motor system plasticity in stroke models: intrinsically use-dependent, unreliably useful. Stroke 44, S104-S106 (2013).
12. Zeiler, S. R., & Krakauer, J. W. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 26, 609-616 (2013).
13. Allred, R. P., Kim, S. Y., & Jones, T. A. Use it and/or lose it - experience effects on brain remodeling across time after stroke. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 379 (2014).
14. Wahl, A. S., & Schwab, M. E. Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 381 (2014).
15. Dromerick, A. W., et al. Critical periods after stroke study: translating animal stroke recovery experiments into a clinical trial. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 231 (2015).
16. Whishaw, I. Q. Loss of the innate cortical engram for action patterns used in skilled reaching and the development of behavioral compensation following motor cortex lesions in the rat. Neuropharmacology 39, 788-805 (2000).
17. Krakauer, J. W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 19, 84-90 (2006).
18. Puig, J., et al. Decreased corticospinal tract fractional anisotropy predicts long-Term motor outcome after stroke. Stroke 44, 2016-2018 (2013).
19. Sterr, A., Dean, P. J. A., Szameitat, A. J., Conforto, A. B., & Shen, S. Corticospinal tract integrity and lesion volume play different roles in chronic hemiparesis and its improvement through motor practice. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 28, 335-343 (2014).
20. Latash, M. L. Progress in Motor Control: Structure- Function Relations in Voluntary Movements (Human Kinetics, 2002).
21. Twitchell, T. E. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain J. Neurol. 74, 443-480 (1951).
22. McCrea, P. H., Eng, J. J., & Hodgson, A. J. Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2999-3008 (2005).
23. Wagner, J. M., Dromerick, A. W., Sahrmann, S. A., & Lang, C. E. Upper extremity muscle activation during recovery of reaching in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 164-176 (2007).
24. Roh, J., Rymer, W. Z., Perreault, E. J., Yoo, S. B., & Beer, R. F. Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors. J. Neurophysiol. 109, 768-781 (2013).
25. Roby-Brami, A., Fuchs, S., Mokhtari, M., & Bussel, B. Reaching and grasping strategies in hemiparetic patients. Motor Control 1, 72-91 (1997).
26. Lang, C. E., et al. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp. Brain Res. 166, 126-136 (2005).
27. Nowak, D. A. The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 1439-1450 (2008).
28. Alt Murphy, M., Willén, C., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. Responsiveness of upper extremity kinematic measures and clinical improvement during the first three months after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 844-853 (2013).
29. van Dokkum, L., et al. The contribution of kinematics in the assessment of upper limb motor recovery early after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 28, 4-12 (2014).
30. Foroud, A., & Whishaw, I. Q. Reaching-To eat in humans post-stroke: fluctuating components within a constant pattern. Behav. Neurosci. 124, 851-867 (2010).
31. Nowak, D. A., et al. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 3173-3184 (2007).
32. Kaeser, M., et al. Effects of unilateral motor cortex lesion on ipsilesional hand?s reach and grasp performance in monkeys: relationship with recovery in the contralesional hand. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 1630-1645 (2010).
33. Bowden, J. L., Taylor, J. L., & McNulty, P. A. Voluntary activation is reduced in both the more- And less-Affected upper limbs after unilateral stroke. Front. Neurol. 5, 239 (2014).
34. Stewart, J. C., Gordon, J., & Winstein, C. J. Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke II: planning and adjustments to control movement distance. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 3431-3443 (2014).
35. Nielsen, J. B., Crone, C., & Hultborn, H. The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity - from a basic science point of view. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 189, 171-180 (2007).
36. Levin, M. F., Selles, R. W., Verheul, M. H., & Meijer, O. G. Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: implications for normal motor control. Brain Res. 853, 352-369 (2000).
37. Torre, K., et al. Somatosensory-related limitations for bimanual coordination after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 507-515 (2013).
38. Borich, M. R., Brodie, S. M., Gray, W. A., Ionta, S., & Boyd, L. A. Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: opportunities for rehabilitation. Neuropsychologia 79, 246-255 (2015).
39. Meyer, S., et al. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping of stroke lesions underlying somatosensory deficits. Neuroimage Clin. 10, 257-266 (2016).
40. Cheung, V. C. K., et al. Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14652-14656 (2012).
41. Lee, S. W., Triandafilou, K., Lock, B. A., & Kamper, D. G. Impairment in task-specific modulation of muscle coordination correlates with the severity of hand impairment following stroke. PLoS ONE 8, e68745 (2013).
42. Cirstea, M. C., & Levin, M. F. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123, 940-953 (2000).
43. Levin, M. F., Michaelsen, S. M., Cirstea, C. M., & Roby-Brami, A. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp. Brain Res. 143, 171-180 (2002).
44. Buma, F., Kwakkel, G., & Ramsey, N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 31, 707-722 (2013).
45. Shaikh, T., Goussev, V., Feldman, A. G., & Levin, M. F. Arm-Trunk coordination for beyond-The-reach movements in adults with stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 28, 355-366 (2014).
46. Michaelsen, S. M., Jacobs, S., Roby-Brami, A., & Levin, M. F. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp. Brain Res. 157, 162-173 (2004).
47. Levin, M. F., Liebermann, D. G., Parmet, Y., & Berman, S. Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 635-646 (2016).
48. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 22, 281-299 (2004).
49. Latash, M. L. Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Motor Control 14, 294-322 (2010).
50. Lang, C. E., Wagner, J. M., Edwards, D. F., Sahrmann, S. A., & Dromerick, A. W. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 20, 444-454 (2006).
51. Raghavan, P., Santello, M., Gordon, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 3034-3043 (2010).
52. Tretriluxana, J., Gordon, J., Fisher, B. E., & Winstein, C. J. Hemisphere specific impairments in reach to grasp control after stroke: effects of object size. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 679-691 (2009).
53. Schaefer, S. Y., DeJong, S. L., Cherry, K. M., & Lang, C. E. Grip type and task goal modify reach to grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis. Motor Control 16, 245-264 (2012).
54. Sterr, A., Freivogel, S., & Schmalohr, D. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 1726-1731 (2002).
55. Han, C. E., et al. Quantifying arm nonuse in individuals poststroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 439-447 (2013).
56. Rinehart, J. K., Singleton, R. D., Adair, J. C., Sadek, J. R., & Haaland, K. Y. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 40, 545-550 (2009).
57. Haaland, K. Y., et al. Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 1957-1962 (2012).
58. Dickstein, R., Heffes, Y., Laufer, Y., & Ben-Haim, Z. Activation of selected trunk muscles during symmetric functional activities in poststroke hemiparetic and hemiplegic patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 66, 218-221 (1999).
59. Carr, L. J., Harrison, L. M., & Stephens, J. A. Evidence for bilateral innervation of certain homologous motoneurone pools in man. J. Physiol. 475, 217-227 (1994).
60. Rossi, E., Mitnitski, A., & Feldman, A. G. Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans. J. Physiol. 538, 659-671 (2002).
61. Whishaw, I. Q., Pellis, S. M., & Gorny, B. P. Skilled reaching in rats and humans: evidence for parallel development or homology. Behav. Brain Res. 47, 59-70 (1992).
62. Sacrey, L. A. R., Alaverdashvili, M., & Whishaw, I. Q. Similar hand shaping in reaching-for-food (skilled reaching) in rats and humans provides evidence of homology in release, collection, and manipulation movements. Behav. Brain Res. 204, 153-161 (2009).
63. Whishaw, I. Q., Pellis, S. M., Gorny, B. P., & Pellis, V. C. The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: an endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 42, 77-91 (1991).
64. Whishaw, I. Q., Gorny, B., & Sarna, J. Paw and limb use in skilled and spontaneous reaching after pyramidal tract, red nucleus and combined lesions in the rat: behavioral and anatomical dissociations. Behav. Brain Res. 93, 167-183 (1998).
65. Braun, R. G., Andrews, E. M., & Kartje, G. L. Kinematic analysis of motor recovery with human adult bone marrow-derived somatic cell therapy in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 898-906 (2012).
66. Klein, A., Sacrey, L. A. R., Whishaw, I. Q., & Dunnett, S. B. The use of rodent skilled reaching as a translational model for investigating brain damage and disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1030-1042 (2012).
67. Alaverdashvili, M., Foroud, A., Lim, D. H., & Whishaw, I. Q. "Learned baduse" limits recovery of skilled reaching for food after forelimb motor cortex stroke in rats: a new analysis of the effect of gestures on success. Behav. Brain Res. 188, 281-290 (2008).
68. Lai, S., et al. Quantitative kinematic characterization of reaching impairments in mice after a stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 382-392 (2015).
69. Metz, G. A., Antonow-Schlorke, I., & Witte, O. W. Motor improvements after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats are mediated by compensatory mechanisms. Behav. Brain Res. 162, 71-82 (2005).
70. Whishaw, I. Q., & Coles, B. L. Varieties of paw and digit movement during spontaneous food handling in rats: postures, bimanual coordination, preferences, and the effect of forelimb cortex lesions. Behav. Brain Res. 77, 135-148 (1996).
71. Allred, R. P., et al. The vermicelli handling test: a simple quantitative measure of dexterous forepaw function in rats. J. Neurosci. Methods 170, 229-244 (2008).
72. Jones, T. A., & Schallert, T. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J. Neurosci. 14, 2140-2152 (1994).
73. Friel, K. M., & Nudo, R. J. Recovery of motor function after focal cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns used during rehabilitative training. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 15, 173-189 (1998).
74. Plautz, E. J., Milliken, G. W., & Nudo, R. J. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 74, 27-55 (2000).
75. Murata, Y., et al. Effects of motor training on the recovery of manual dexterity after primary motor cortex lesion in macaque monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 773-786 (2008).
76. Moore, T. L., et al. Recovery from ischemia in the middle-Aged brain: a nonhuman primate model. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 619.e9-619.e24 (2012).
77. Murata, Y., & Higo, N. Development and characterization of a macaque model of focal internal capsular infarcts. PLoS ONE 11, e0154752 (2016).
78. Stanley, J., & Krakauer, J. W. Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 503 (2013).
79. Knapp, H. D., Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp. Neurol. 7, 305-315 (1963).
80. Peterson, G. M. Mechanisms of Handedness in the Rat (Johns Hopkins Press, 1934).
81. Döbrössy, M. D., & Dunnett, S. B. The effects of lateralized training on spontaneous forelimb preference, lesion deficits, and graft-mediated functional recovery after unilateral striatal lesions in rats. Exp. Neurol. 199, 373-383 (2006).
82. Erickson, C. A., Gharbawie, O. A., & Whishaw, I. Q. Attempt-dependent decrease in skilled reaching characterizes the acute postsurgical period following a forelimb motor cortex lesion: an experimental demonstration of learned nonuse in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 179, 208-218 (2007).
83. Michaelsen, S. M., Dannenbaum, R., & Levin, M. F. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke 37, 186-192 (2006
84. Subramanian, S. K., Yamanaka, J., Chilingaryan, G., & Levin, M. F. Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke. Stroke 41, 2303-2308 (2010).
85. Cirstea, C. M., Ptito, A., & Levin, M. F. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 37, 1237-1242 (2006).
86. Lum, P. S., et al. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 16, 237-253 (2009).
87. Poole, J. L., Sadek, J., & Haaland, K. Y. Ipsilateral deficits in 1 handed shoe tying after left or right hemisphere stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 90, 1800-1805 (2009).
88. Walker, C. M., Walker, M. F., & Sunderland, A. Dressing after a stroke: a survey of current occupational therapy practice. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 66, 263-268 (2003).
89. Kitago, T., et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation?. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 99-109 (2013).
90. Wu, C., Chen, C., Tang, S. F., Lin, K., & Huang, Y. Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 964-970 (2007).
91. Caimmi, M., et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 31-39 (2008).
92. Massie, C., Malcolm, M. P., Greene, D., & Thaut, M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 90, 571-579 (2009).
93. Alaverdashvili, M., & Whishaw, I. Q. A behavioral method for identifying recovery and compensation: hand use in a preclinical stroke model using the single pellet reaching task. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 950-967 (2013).
94. O?Bryant, A. J., et al. Enduring poststroke motor functional improvements by a well-Timed combination of motor rehabilitative training and cortical stimulation in rats. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 143-154 (2016).
95. Moon, S. K., Alaverdashvili, M., Cross, A. R., & Whishaw, I. Q. Both compensation and recovery of skilled reaching following small photothrombotic stroke to motor cortex in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 218, 145-153 (2009).
96. Murata, Y., et al. Temporal plasticity involved in recovery from manual dexterity deficit after motor cortex lesion in macaque monkeys. J. Neurosci. 35, 84-95 (2015).
97. Starkey, M. L., et al. Back seat driving: hindlimb corticospinal neurons assume forelimb control following ischaemic stroke. Brain 135, 3265-3281 (2012).
98. Liu, Z., Zhang, R. L., Li, Y., Cui, Y., & Chopp, M. Remodeling of the corticospinal innervation and spontaneous behavioral recovery after ischemic stroke in adult mice. Stroke 40, 2546-2551 (2009).
99. Carmichael, S. T., Kathirvelu, B., Schweppe, C. A., & Nie, E. H. Molecular, cellular and functional events in axonal sprouting after stroke. Exp. Neurol. 287, 384-394 (2017).
100. Cheng, H. W., et al. Differential spine loss and regrowth of striatal neurons following multiple forms of deafferentation: a Golgi study. Exp. Neurol. 147, 287-298 (1997).
101. Adkins, D. L., Bury, S. D., & Jones, T. A. Laminar-dependent dendritic spine alterations in the motor cortex of adult rats following callosal transection and forced forelimb use. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 78, 35-52 (2002).
102. Vuksic, M., et al. Unilateral entorhinal denervation leads to long-lasting dendritic alterations of mouse hippocampal granule cells. Exp. Neurol. 230, 176-185 (2011).
103. Muramatsu, R., et al. Angiogenesis induced by CNS inflammation promotes neuronal remodeling through vessel-derived prostacyclin. Nat. Med. 18, 1658-1664 (2012).
104. Hermann, D. M., Buga, A. M., & Popa-Wagner, A. Neurovascular remodeling in the aged ischemic brain. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 122 (Suppl. 1), S25-S33 (2015).
105. Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 861-872 (2009).
106. Jones, T. A., & Adkins, D. L. Motor system reorganization after stroke: stimulating and training toward perfection. Physiology (Bethesda) 30, 358-370 (2015).
107. Hinman, J. D. The back and forth of axonal injury and repair after stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 27, 615-623 (2014).
108. Krakauer, J. W., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Wittenberg, G. F. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models?. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 923-931 (2012).
109. Manganotti, P., Acler, M., Zanette, G. P., Smania, N., & Fiaschi, A. Motor cortical disinhibition during early and late recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 396-403 (2008).
110. Hummel, F. C., et al. Deficient intracortical inhibition (SICI) during movement preparation after chronic stroke. Neurology 72, 1766-1772 (2009).
111. Carmichael, S. T. Brain excitability in stroke: the yin and yang of stroke progression. Arch. Neurol. 69, 161-167 (2012).
112. Dijkhuizen, R. M., et al. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 23, 510-517 (2003).
113. Grefkes, C., & Ward, N. S. Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional?. Neuroscientist 20, 56-70 (2014).
114. Overman, J. J., et al. A role for ephrin A5 in axonal sprouting, recovery, and activity-dependent plasticity after stroke. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2230-E2239 (2012).
115. Ishida, A., et al. Causal link between the cortico-rubral pathway and functional recovery through forced impaired limb use in rats with stroke. J. Neurosci. 36, 455-467 (2016).
116. Kim, S. Y., et al. Experience with the ?good? limb induces aberrant synaptic plasticity in the perilesion cortex after stroke. J. Neurosci. 35, 8604-8610 (2015).
117. Wang, L., Conner, J. M., Nagahara, A. H., & Tuszynski, M. H. Rehabilitation drives enhancement of neuronal structure in functionally relevant neuronal subsets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2750-2755 (2016).
118. Bury, S. D., Eichhorn, A. C., Kotzer, C. M., & Jones, T. A. Reactive astrocytic responses to denervation in the motor cortex of adult rats are sensitive to manipulations of behavioral experience. Neuropharmacology 39, 743-755 (2000).
119. Brus-Ramer, M., Carmel, J. B., Chakrabarty, S., & Martin, J. H. Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury. J. Neurosci. 27, 13793-13801 (2007).
120. Friel, K. M., & Martin, J. H. Bilateral activity-dependent interactions in the developing corticospinal system. J. Neurosci. 27, 11083-11090 (2007).
121. Jiang, Y. Q., Zaaimi, B., & Martin, J. H. Competition with primary sensory afferents drives remodeling of corticospinal axons in mature spinal motor circuits. J. Neurosci. 36, 193-203 (2016).
122. Theodosis, D. T., Poulain, D. A., & Oliet, S. H. R. Activity-dependent structural and functional plasticity of astrocyte-neuron interactions. Physiol. Rev. 88, 983-1008 (2008).
123. Perez-Alvarez, A., Navarrete, M., Covelo, A., Martin, E. D., & Araque, A. Structural and functional plasticity of astrocyte processes and dendritic spine interactions. J. Neurosci. 34, 12738-12744 (2014).
124. Lacoste, B., et al. Sensory-related neural activity regulates the structure of vascular networks in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 83, 1117-1130 (2014).
125. Jones, T. A. Multiple synapse formation in the motor cortex opposite unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 414, 57-66 (1999).
126. Jones, T. A., & Jefferson, S. C. Reflections of experience-expectant development in repair of the adult damaged brain. Dev. Psychobiol. 53, 466-475 (2011).
127. Bury, S. D., et al. Denervation facilitates neuronal growth in the motor cortex of rats in the presence of behavioral demand. Neurosci. Lett. 287, 85-88 (2000).
128. Bury, S. D., & Jones, T. A. Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the ?unaffected? forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 22, 8597-8606 (2002).
129. Hsu, J. E., & Jones, T. A. Contralesional neural plasticity and functional changes in the less-Affected forelimb after large and small cortical infarcts in rats. Exp. Neurol. 201, 479-494 (2006).
130. Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272, 1791-1794 (1996).
131. Conner, J. M., Chiba, A. A., & Tuszynski, M. H. The basal forebrain cholinergic system is essential for cortical plasticity and functional recovery following brain injury. Neuron 46, 173-179 (2005).
132. Nishibe, M., Urban, E. T. R., Barbay, S., & Nudo, R. J. Rehabilitative training promotes rapid motor recovery but delayed motor map reorganization in a rat cortical ischemic infarct model. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 472-482 (2015).
133. Tennant, K. A., et al. Age-dependent reorganization of peri-infarct ?premotor? cortex with task-specific rehabilitative training in mice. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 193-202 (2015).
134. Liepert, J., et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31, 1210-1216 (2000).
135. Sawaki, L., et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 505-513 (2008).
136. Biernaskie, J., Chernenko, G., & Corbett, D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 24, 1245-1254 (2004).
137. Lang, K. C., Thompson, P. A., & Wolf, S. L. The EXCITE Trial: reacquiring upper-extremity task performance with early versus late delivery of constraint therapy. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 654-663 (2013).
138. Zeiler, S. R., et al. Paradoxical motor recovery from a first stroke after induction of a second stroke: reopening a postischemic sensitive period. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 794-800 (2016).
139. Barbay, S., et al. Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 169, 106-116 (2006).
140. Palmér, T., Tamtè, M., Halje, P., Enqvist, O., & Petersson, P. A system for automated tracking of motor components in neurophysiological research. J. Neurosci. Methods 205, 334-344 (2012).
141. Lambercy, O., et al. Sub-processes of motor learning revealed by a robotic manipulandum for rodents. Behav. Brain Res. 278, 569-576 (2015).
142. Michaelsen, S. M., Luta, A., Roby-Brami, A., & Levin, M. F. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 32, 1875-1883 (2001).
143. Dromerick, A. W., et al. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 401-408 (2006).
144. Allred, R. P., Maldonado, M. A., Hsu, J. E., & Jones, T. A. Training the ?less-Affected? forelimb after unilateral cortical infarcts interferes with functional recovery of the impaired forelimb in rats. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 23, 297-302 (2005).
145. Allred, R. P., & Jones, T. A. Maladaptive effects of learning with the less-Affected forelimb after focal cortical infarcts in rats. Exp. Neurol. 210, 172-181 (2008).
146. Kerr, A. L., Wolke, M. L., Bell, J. A., & Jones, T. A. Post-stroke protection from maladaptive effects of learning with the non-paretic forelimb by bimanual home cage experience in C57BL/6 mice. Behav. Brain Res. 252, 180-187 (2013).
147. Kerr, A. L., Cheffer, K. A., Curtis, M. C., & Rodriguez, A. Long-Term deficits of the paretic limb follow post-stroke compensatory limb use in C57BL/6 mice. Behav. Brain Res. 303, 103-108 (2016).
148. MacLellan, C. L., Langdon, K. D., Botsford, A., Butt, S., & Corbett, D. A model of persistent learned nonuse following focal ischemia in rats. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 900-907 (2013).
149. Xu, T., et al. Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories. Nature 462, 915-919 (2009).
150. Jones, T. A., Chu, C. J., Grande, L. A., & Gregory, A. D. Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J. Neurosci. 19, 10153-10163 (1999).
151. Kleim, J. A., et al. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 77, 63-77 (2002).
152. Ganeshina, O., Berry, R. W., Petralia, R. S., Nicholson, D. A., & Geinisman, Y. Synapses with a segmented, completely partitioned postsynaptic density express more AMPA receptors than other axospinous synaptic junctions. Neuroscience 125, 615-623 (2004).
153. Lee, K. J., et al. Motor skill training induces coordinated strengthening and weakening between neighboring synapses. J. Neurosci. 33, 9794-9799 (2013).
154. Allred, R. P., Cappellini, C. H., & Jones, T. A. The ?good? limb makes the ?bad? limb worse: experience-dependent interhemispheric disruption of functional outcome after cortical infarcts in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 124, 124-132 (2010).
155. Hummel, F. C., & Cohen, L. G. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?. Lancet Neurol. 5, 708-712 (2006).
156. Bütefisch, C. M., Kleiser, R., & Seitz, R. J. Post-lesional cerebral reorganisation: evidence from functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Physiol. Paris 99, 437-454 (2006).
157. Jankowska, E., & Edgley, S. A. How can corticospinal tract neurons contribute to ipsilateral movements?. A question with implications for recovery of motor functions. Neuroscientist 12, 67-79 (2006).
158. Bradnam, L. V., Stinear, C. M., & Byblow, W. D. Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 184 (2013).
159. Dancause, N., Touvykine, B., & Mansoori, B. K. Inhibition of the contralesional hemisphere after stroke: reviewing a few of the building blocks with a focus on animal models. Prog. Brain Res. 218, 361-387 (2015).
160. Murase, N., Duque, J., Mazzocchio, R., & Cohen, L. G. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann. Neurol. 55, 400-409 (2004).
161. Harris-Love, M. L., Chan, E., Dromerick, A. W., & Cohen, L. G. Neural substrates of motor recovery in severely impaired stroke patients with hand paralysis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 328-338 (2016).
162. Fregni, F., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 16, 1551-1555 (2005).
163. Nowak, D. A., et al. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch. Neurol. 65, 741-747 (2008).
164. Grefkes, C., et al. Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 50, 233-242 (2010).
165. Bradnam, L. V., Stinear, C. M., Barber, P. A., & Byblow, W. D. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cereb. Cortex 22, 2662-2671 (2012).
166. Talelli, P., et al. Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 976-987 (2012).
167. Mohapatra, S., et al. Role of contralesional hemisphere in paretic arm reaching in patients with severe arm paresis due to stroke: a preliminary report. Neurosci. Lett. 617, 52-58 (2016).
168. Lotze, M., et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J. Neurosci. 26, 6096-6102 (2006).
169. Biernaskie, J., Szymanska, A., Windle, V., & Corbett, D. Bi hemispheric contribution to functional motor recovery of the affected forelimb following focal ischemic brain injury in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 989-999 (2005).
170. Shanina, E. V., Schallert, T., Witte, O. W., & Redecker, C. Behavioral recovery from unilateral photothrombotic infarcts of the forelimb sensorimotor cortex in rats: role of the contralateral cortex. Neuroscience 139, 1495-1506 (2006).
171. O?Bryant, A., Bernier, B., & Jones, T. A. Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-Affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 177, 298-307 (2007).
172. Lindau, N. T., et al. Rewiring of the corticospinal tract in the adult rat after unilateral stroke and anti- Nogo A therapy. Brain 137, 739-756 (2014).
173. Ueno, M., Hayano, Y., Nakagawa, H., & Yamashita, T. Intraspinal rewiring of the corticospinal tract requires target-derived brain-derived neurotrophic factor and compensates lost function after brain injury. Brain 135, 1253-1267 (2012).
174. Tanaka, T., Fujita, Y., Ueno, M., Shultz, L. D., & Yamashita, T. Suppression of SHP 1 promotes corticospinal tract sprouting and functional recovery after brain injury. Cell Death Dis. 4, e567 (2013).
175. Morecraft, R. J., et al. Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta). J. Comp. Neurol. 524, 380-407 (2016).
176. Harris-Love, M. L., Chen, E. Dromerick, A. W., & Cohen, L. G. Neural substrates of motor recovery in severely impaired stroke patients with hand paralysis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 328-338 (2016).
177. Hodics, T., Cohen, L. G., & Cramer, S. C. Functional imaging of intervention effects in stroke motor rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, S36-S42 (2006).
178. Hubbard, I. J., et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of early upper-limb training on stroke recovery and brain activation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 703-713 (2015).
179. Harris-Love, M. L., Morton, S. M., Perez, M. A., & Cohen, L. G. Mechanisms of short-Term training-induced reaching improvement in severely hemiparetic stroke patients: a TMS study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25, 398-411 (2011).
180. Lee, M. Y., et al. Cortical activation pattern of compensatory movement in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation 25, 255-260 (2009).
181. Byblow, W. D., Stinear, C. M., Barber, P. A., Petoe, M. A., & Ackerley, S. J. Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann. Neurol. 78, 848-859 (2015).
182. Feeney, D. M., & Baron, J. C. Diaschisis. Stroke 17, 817-830 (1986).
183. Cho, J., et al. Remodeling of neuronal circuits after reach training in chronic capsular stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 30, 941-950 (2016).
184. Ergul, A., Alhusban, A., & Fagan, S. C. Angiogenesis: a harmonized target for recovery after stroke. Stroke 43, 2270-2274 (2012).
185. Reeves, T. M., Prins, M. L., Zhu, J., Povlishock, J. T., & Phillips, L. L. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition alters functional and structural correlates of deafferentation-induced sprouting in the dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 23, 10182-10189 (2003).
186. Nudo, R. J. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 887 (2013).
187. Schallert, T., Woodlee, M. T., & Fleming, S. M. in Pharmacology of Cerebral Ischemia 201-216 (Stuttgart, 2002).
188. Schallert, T., Fleming, S. M., Leasure, J. L., Tillerson, J. L., & Bland, S. T. CNS plasticity and assessment of forelimb sensorimotor outcome in unilateral rat models of stroke, cortical ablation, parkinsonism and spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology 39, 777-787 (2000).
189. Schallert, T., Kozlowski, D. A., Humm, J. L., & Cocke, R. R. Use-dependent structural events in recovery of function. Adv. Neurol. 73, 229-238 (1997).
190. Blasi, F., Whalen, M. J., & Ayata, C. Lasting pure-motor deficits after focal posterior internal capsule white-matter infarcts in rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 35, 977-984 (2015).