Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 505-513

  Sawaki, Lumy ^a,g   Butler, Andrew J ^b,c   Leng, Xiaoyan ^a   Wassenaar, Peter A ^d   Mohammad, Yousef M ^d   Blanton, Sarah ^b   Sathian, K ^b,c   Nichols Larsen, Deborah S ^d   Wolf, Steven L ^b,c   Good, David C ^a,e   Wittenberg, George F ^a,f  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Education   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Plasticity; Recovery; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BRAIN MAPPING; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 50049087315     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317531     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ottenbacher K. Cerebral vascular accident: some characteristics of occupational therapy evaluation forms. Am J Occup Ther. 1980 ; 34: 268-271.
2. Broderick J., Brott T., Kothari R., et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998 ; 29: 415-421.
3. Wittenberg GF, Chen R., Ishii K., et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 ; 17: 48-57.
4. Schaechter JD, Kraft E., Hilliard TS, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 ; 16: 326-338.
5. Hamada I., DeLong MR Excitotoxic acid lesions of the primate subthalamic nucleus result in reduced pallidal neuronal activity during active holding. J Neurophysiol. 1992 ; 68: 1859-1866.
6. Hamzei F., Liepert J., Dettmers C., Weiller C., Rijntjes M. Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage. 2006 ; 31: 710-720.
7. Liepert J., Miltner WH, Bauder H., et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998 ; 250: 5-8.
8. Rossini PM, Caltagirone C., Castriota-Scanderbeg A., et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: a study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport. 1998 ; 9: 2141-2146.
9. Nudo RJ Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 ; 14 (1 Suppl). S57 - S76.
10. Taub E., Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003 (41 Suppl). 34-40.
11. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989 ; 104: 125-132.
12. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981 ; 61: 1022-1028.
13. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999 ; 30: 2369-2375.
14. Taub E., Uswatte G., King DK, Morris D., Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006 ; 37: 1045-1049.
15. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 ; 296: 2095-2104.
16. Liepert J., Uhde I., Gräf S., Leidner O., Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2001 ; 248: 315-321.
17. Taub E., Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 ; 74: 347-354.
18. Johansen-Berg H., Dawes H., Guy C., Smith SM, Wade DT, Matthews PM Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain. 2002 ; 125: 2731-2742.
19. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983 ; 63: 1393-1403.
20. Taub E., Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 ; 61: 281-293.
21. Panyan M. How to Use Shaping. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises ; 1980.
22. Winstein C. Designing practice for motor learning: clinical impressions. In: Lister M, ed. Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference. Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy ; 1991.
23. Schmidt RA, Lee TD Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics ; 1999.
24. Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Campana GI, et al. Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 ; 115: 1740-1747.
25. Brasil-Neto JP, McShane LM, Fuhr P., Hallett M., Cohen LG Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 ; 85: 9-16.
26. Kobayashi M., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2003 ; 2: 145-156.
27. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 ; 91: 79-92.
28. Wassermann EM, McShane LM, Hallett M., Cohen LG Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 ; 85: 1-8.
29. Devanne H., Lavoie BA, Capaday C. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1997 ; 114: 329-338.
30. Rothwell JC Physiological studies of electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991 ; 43: 29-35.
31. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 ; 19: 194-205.
32. Chollet F., Weiller C. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 ; 4: 226-230.
33. Chollet F., Loubinoux I., Carel C., Marque P., Albucher JF, Guiraud-Chaumeil. Mechanisms of motor recovery after cerebrovascular accident [in French]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999 ; 155: 718-724.
34. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002 ; 125: 773-788.
35. Pascual-Leone A., Grafmann J., Hallet M. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994 ; 263: 1287-1289.
36. Bastings EP, Greenberg JP, Good DC Hand motor recovery after stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 ; 16: 275-282.
37. Dong Y., Winstein CJ, Albistegui-Dubois R., Dobkin BH Evolution of FMRI activation in the perilesional primary motor cortex and cerebellum with rehabilitation training-related motor gains after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 412-428.
38. Butler AJ, Wolf SL Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess cortical plasticity: a critical perspective for stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 (41 Suppl). 20-26.