Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke II: planning and adjustments to control movement distance

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3431-3443

  Stewart, Jill Campbell ^a   Gordon, James ^b   Winstein, Carolee J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Motor planning; Reaching; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACHIEVEMENT; ADJUSTMENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTICIPATION; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROL OF MOVEMENT DISTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE STRENGTH; PARESIS; PLANNING; STATISTICAL MODEL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPLICATION; FINGER; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; INNERVATION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE;

EID: 84930896760     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4025-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersen RA, Cui H (2009) Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron 63:568–583
2. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C (1991) Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 337:1521–1526
3. Barker RN, Gill TJ, Brauer SG (2007) Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil 29:981–989
4. Brown SH, Cooke JD (1984) Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude. Exp Brain Res 55:523–527
5. Calarusso RP, Hammill DD (1972) The motor-free visual perception test (MVPT). Academic Therapy Publications, San Rafael
6. Canning CG, Ada L, O’Dwyer NJ (2000) Abnormal muscle activation characteristics associated with loss of dexterity after stroke. J Neurol Sci 176:45–56
7. Carey LM, Matyas TA (2011) Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 43:257–263
8. Chae J, Yang G, Park BK, Labatia I (2002) Delay in initiation and termination of muscle contraction, motor impairment, and physical disability in upper limb hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve 25:568–575
9. Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA (2008) Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil 22:758–767
10. DeJong SL, Birkenmeier RL, Lang CE (2012) Person-specific changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity functional gains after stroke. J Appl Biomech 28:304–316
11. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431
12. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD et al (2010) Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:178–187
13. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ (1999) The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30:2131–2140
14. Fisher BE, Winstein CJ, Velicki MR (2000) Deficits in compensatory trajectory adjustments after unilateral sensorimotor stroke. Exp Brain Res 132:328–344
15. Fogassi L, Luppino G (2005) Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:626–631
16. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198
17. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13–31
18. Ghez C, Gordon J (1987) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Role of opposing muscles. Exp Brain Res 67:225–240
19. Gordon J, Ghez C (1987a) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res 67:241–252
20. Gordon J, Ghez C (1987b) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67:253–269
21. Harris JE, Eng JJ (2006) Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20:380–389
22. Hartman-Maeir A, Katz N (1995) Validity of the behavioral inattention test (BIT): relationships with functional tasks. Am J Occup Ther 49:507–516
23. Hoshi E, Tanji J (2007) Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: anatomical connectivity and functional properties. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:234–242
24. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727
25. Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS et al (2013) Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27:99–109
26. Kokotilo KJ, Eng JJ, McKeown MJ, Boyd LA (2010) Greater activation of secondary motor areas is related to less arm use after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:78–87
27. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, Hu Q, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW (2005) Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 166:126–136
28. Levin MF (1996) Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 119(Pt 1):281–293
29. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, Roby-Brami A (2002) Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 143:171–180
30. Longo MR, Azanon E, Haggard P (2010) More than skin deep: body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia 48:655–668
31. Lyle RC (1981) A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 4:483–492
32. Mani S, Mutha PK, Przybyla A, Haaland KY, Good DC, Sainburg RL (2013) Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms. Brain 136:1288–1303
33. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J (2005) Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 19:544–551
34. McCrea PH, Eng JJ (2005) Consequences of increased neuromotor noise for reaching movements in persons with stroke. Exp Brain Res 162:70–77
35. Messier J, Kalaska JF (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125:139–152
36. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL (2007) Control of velocity and position in single joint movements. Hum Mov Sci 26:808–823
37. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
38. Platz T, Prass K, Denzler P, Bock S, Mauritz KH (1999) Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high-functioning stroke patients: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:270–277
39. Platz T, Bock S, Prass K (2001) Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study. Neuropsychologia 39:687–698
40. Portney L, Watkins M (2009) Foundations of Clinical Research: applications to practice. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
41. Romo R, Lemus L, de Lafuente V (2012) Sense, memory, and decision-making in the somatosensory cortical network. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:914–919
42. Sabes PN (2000) The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:740–746
43. Sainburg RL, Schaefer SY (2004) Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. J Neurophysiol 92:1374–1383
44. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2007) Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 130:2146–2158
45. Semrau JA, Herter TM, Scott SH, Dukelow SP (2013) Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke. Stroke 44:3414–3421
46. Stewart JC, Cramer SC (2013) Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke 44:1111–1116
47. Stewart JC, Gordon J, Winstein CJ (2013) Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10:27
48. Stewart JC, Gordon J, Winstein CJ (2014) Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke: kinematic differences based on side of brain damage. Exp Brain Res 232:2407–2419
49. Tunik E, Rice NJ, Hamilton A, Grafton ST (2007) Beyond grasping: representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage 36(Suppl 2):T77–T86
50. van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EE, Nijland RH, de Groot JH, Meskers CG, Harlaar J, Kwakkel G (2012) Assessing longitudinal change in coordination of the paretic upper limb using on-site 3-dimensional kinematic measurements. Phys Ther 92:142–151
51. Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Lang CE (2007a) Upper extremity muscle activation during recovery of reaching in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 118:164–176
52. Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW (2007b) Sensorimotor impairments and reaching performance in subjects with poststroke hemiparesis during the first few months of recovery. Phys Ther 87:751–765
53. Williams PS, Basso DM, Case-Smith J, Nichols-Larsen DS (2006) Development of the hand active sensation test: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1471–1477
54. Winter D (2005) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken
55. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al (2006) Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296:2095–2104
56. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(Suppl):1212–1217