Instructional leadership structure in Singapore: a co-existence of hierarchy and heterarchy

Journal of Educational Administration

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 147-167

  Nguyen, Dong Thanh ^a   Ng, David ^a   Yap, Pui San ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Heterarchy; Hierarchy; Hybrid leadership structure; Instructional leadership; Singapore

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015826869     PISSN: 09578234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0060     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Andrews, R.L. and Soder, R. (1987), “Principal leadership and student achievement”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 9-11.
2. Beck, L. and Murphy, J. (1993), Understanding the Principalship: Metaphorical Themes, 1920s-1990s, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
3. Belchetz, D. and Leithwood, K. (2007), “Successful leadership: does context matter and if so, how?”, in Day, C. and Leithwood, K. (Eds), Successful Principal Leadership: An International Perspective, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 117-137.
4. Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (2003), Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
5. Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B. and Lee, G. (1982), “The instructional management role of the principal”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 34-64.
6. Bredeson, P. (2013), “Distributed instructional leadership in urban high schools: transforming the work of principals and department chairs through professional development”, Journal of School Leadership, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 362-388.
7. Brookover, W.B. and Lezotte, L.W. (1977), Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement, The Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
8. Bush, T. (2014), “Instructional leadership in centralized contexts: rhetoric or reality?”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 3-5.
9. Danielson, C. (2011), “Evaluations that help teachers learn”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 68 No. 4, pp. 35-39.
10. Diefenbach, T. and Sillince, J.A. (2011), “Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization”, Organization Studies, Vol. 32 No. 11, pp. 1515-1537.
11. Dimmock, C. (2011), “Formulating a research agenda in school leadership and organisational change for school improvement in Singapore”, School Leadership & Management, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 321-338.
12. Dwyer, D., Lee, G., Rowan, B. and Bossert, S. (1983), “Five principals in action: perspectives on instructional management”, report, Far West Lab for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco, CA.
13. Edmonds, R. (1979), “Effective schools for the urban poor”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 15-24.
14. Fairtlough, G. (2005), The Three Ways of Getting Things Done: Hierarchy, Heterarchy and Responsible Autonomy in Organizations, Triarchy Press, Dorset.
15. Firestone, W.A. and Herriott, R.E. (1982), “Prescriptions for effective elementary schools don’t fit secondary schools”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 51-53.
16. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
17. Glickman, C.D. (1985), Supervision of Instruction: A Developmental Approach, Allyn and Bacon, MA.
18. Glickman, C.D. (1989), “Has Sam and Samantha’s time come at last?”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 4-9.
19. Goleman, D. (2007), Social Intelligence, Bantam, New York, NY.
20. Gronn, P. (2000), “Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 317-338.
21. Gronn, P. (2002), “Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 423-451.
22. Gronn, P. (2008), “The future of distributed leadership”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 141-158.
23. Gumus, S., Bellibas, M.S., Esen, M. and Gumus, E. (2016), “A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership.
24. Hairon, S. and Dimmock, C. (2012), “Singapore schools and professional learning communities: teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system”, Educational Review, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 405-424.
25. Hallinger, P. (2003), “Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 329-352.
26. Hallinger, P. (2005), “Instructional leadership and the school principal: a passing fancy that refuses to fade away”, Leadership and Policy in Schools, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 221-240.
27. Hallinger, P. (2013), “A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 126-149.
28. Hallinger, P. (2016), “Instructional leadership and school socio-economic status: a preliminary investigation”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the British Educational Leadership and Management Society (BELMAS), Chester, July 8-10.
29. Hallinger, P. and Bryant, D. (2013), “Mapping the terrain of educational leadership and management in East Asia”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 618-637.
30. Hallinger, P. and Heck, R.H. (1996), “Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980-1995”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 5-44.
31. Hallinger, P. and Ko, J. (2015), “Education accountability and principal leadership effects in Hong Kong primary schools”, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 18-29.
32. Hallinger, P. and Lee, M.S. (2012), “A global study of the practice and impact of distributed instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools”, Leadership & Policy In Schools, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 477-495.
33. Hallinger, P. and Murphy, J.F. (1985), “Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 217-247.
34. Halverson, R. and Clifford, M. (2013), “Distributed instructional leadership in high schools”, Journal of School Leadership, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 389-419.
35. Harris, A. (2007), “Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical reticence”, International Journal of Leadership in Education, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 315-325.
36. Heck, R.H. (1992), “Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: implications for policy development”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 21-34.
37. Herriott, R.E. and Firestone, W.A. (1984), “Two images of schools as organizations: a refinement and elaboration”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 41-57.
38. Higgins, J. and Bonne, L. (2011), “Configurations of instructional leadership enactments that promote the teaching and learning of mathematics in a New Zealand elementary school”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 794-825.
39. Ho, J.Y.P., Chen, D.T.V. and Ng, D. (2015), “Distributed leadership through the lens of activity theory”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 814-836.
40. Holland, P. and Garman, N. (2001), “Toward a resolution of the crisis of legitimacy in the field of supervision”, Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 95-111.
41. Jackson, D.S. (2000), “The school improvement journey: perspectives on leadership”, School Leadership and Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 61-78.
42. Kelley, R.C., Thornton, B. and Daugherty, R. (2005), “Relationship between measures of leadership and school climate”, Education, Vol. 126 No. 1, pp. 17-25.
43. Klar, H.W. (2012), “Fostering distributed instructional leadership: a sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools”, Leadership & Policy in Schools, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 365-390.
44. Koh, H.H., Gurr, D., Drysdale, L. and Ang, L.L. (2011), “How school leaders perceive the leadership role of middle leaders in Singapore primary schools?”, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 609-620.
45. Kontopoulos, K.M. (1993), The Logics of Social Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Lee, D. and Lee, W.O. (2013), “A professional learning community for the new teacher professionalism: the case of a state-led initiative in Singapore schools”, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 435-451.
47. Lee, M., Hallinger, P. and Walker, A. (2012), “A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 664-698.
48. Leithwood, K. (1992), “The move toward transformational leadership”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 8-13.
49. Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2005), “A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005”, Leadership & Policy In Schools, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 177-199.
50. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N. and Yashkina, A. (2007), “Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: taking the ego out of the system”, Leadership and Policy in Schools, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 37-67.
51. Lim-Ratnam, C., Atencio, M. and Lee, C.K. (2016), “Managing the paradox of control: the case of ground-up implementation of active learning in Singapore’s primary schools”, Educational Research for Policy & Practice, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 231-246.
52. Locke, E.A. (2003), “Leadership: starting at the top”, in Pearce, C.J. and Conger, C. (Eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 271-284.
53. Louis, K.S., Dretzke, B. and Wahlstrom, K. (2010), “How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 315-336.
54. Madden, J.V., Lawson, D. and Sweet, D. (1976), “School effectiveness study”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 19-23.
55. Marks, H.M. and Printy, S.M. (2003), “Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 370-397.
56. Morriss, S.B., Low, G.T. and Coleman, M. (1999), “Leadership stereotypes and styles of female Singaporean principals”, Compare, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 191-202.
57. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C. and Barber, M. (2010), How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better, McKinsey and Company, London.
58. Neumerski, C.M. (2013), “Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: what do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 310-347.
59. New York State Office of Education Performance Review (1974), School Factors and Influencing Reading Achievement: A Case Study of Two Inner City Schools, New York State Office of Education Performance Review, Albany, NY.
60. Ng, F.S.D., Nguyen, T.D., Wong, K.B. and Choy, K.W. (2015a), “A review of Singapore principals’ leadership qualities, styles, and roles”, Journal Of Educational Administration, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 512-533.
61. Ng, F.S.D., Nguyen, T.D., Wong, K.B. and Choy, K.W. (2015b), “Instructional leadership practices in Singapore”, School Leadership & Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 388-407.
62. Ng, P.T. (2015), “Aspiring principals’ perception of the challenges of beginning principals and the support that they need”, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 366-376.
63. Nguyen, T.D. and Ng, F.S.D. (2014), “Applying the Rasch model to investigate Singapore principals’ instructional leadership practices”, Leading and Managing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 1-26.
64. Ning, H.K., Lee, D. and Lee, W.O. (2016), “The relationship between teacher value orientations and engagement in professional learning communities”, Teachers and Teaching, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 235-254.
65. Parkin, J. (2015), “Hobbes and the reception of ‘Leviathan’”, Journal of The History of Ideas, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 289-300.
66. Parry, K., Mumford, M.D., Bower, I. and Watts, L.L. (2014), “Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: a review of the first 25 years of the leadership quarterly”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 132-151.
67. Range, B.G., Young, S. and Hvidston, D. (2013), “Teacher perceptions about observation conferences: what do teachers think about their formative supervision in one US school district?”, School Leadership & Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 61-77.
68. Range, B.G., Scherz, S., Holt, C.R. and Young, S. (2011), “Supervision and evaluation: the Wyoming perspective”, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 243-265.
69. Samy, M. and Cook, K. (2009), “Perceived school effectiveness: case study of a Liverpool college”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 185-198.
70. Sharpe, L. and Gopinathan, S. (2000), “Leadership in high achieving schools in Singapore: the influence of societal culture”, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 87-98.
71. Southworth, G. (2002), “Instructional leadership in schools: reflections and empirical evidence”, School Leadership & Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 73-91.
72. Spillane, J.P., Camburn, E.M. and Pareja, A.S. (2007), “Taking distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday”, Leadership and Policy in Schools, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 103-125.
73. Stephenson, K. (2009), “Neither hierarchy nor network: an argument for heterarchy”, People and Strategy, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 4-7.
74. Stern, P.N. (1980), “Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes”, Image, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 20-23.
75. Stott, K. and Low, G.T. (2000), “Leadership in Singapore schools: the impact of national culture”, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 99-109.
76. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
77. Timperley, H. (2005), “Instructional leadership challenges: the case of using student achievement information for instructional improvement”, Leadership & Policy in Schools, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 3-22.
78. Walker, A. and Dimmock, C. (2000), “Mapping the way ahead: leading educational leadership into the globalised world”, School Leadership & Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 227-233.
79. Walker, A. and Hallinger, P. (2015), “A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in East Asia”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 554-570.
80. Wang, L.H., Gurr, D. and Drysdale, L. (2016), “Successful school leadership: case studies of four Singapore primary schools”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 270-287.
81. Weber, G. (1971), “Inner-city children can be taught to read: four successful schools”, CBE Occasional Papers Number 18, Council for Basic Education, Washington, DC.
82. Yu, V. (2009), “Principal leadership for private schools improvement: the Singapore perspective”, The Journal of International Social Research, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 714-749.
83. Lee, M., Walker, A. and Chui, Y.L. (2012), “Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 586-611.
84. Robinson, V.M., Lloyd, C.A. and Rowe, K.J. (2008), “The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 635-674.