Managing the paradox of control: the case of ground-up implementation of active learning in Singapore’s primary schools

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 231-246

  Lim Ratnam, Christina ^a   Atencio, Matthew ^b   Lee, Christine Kim Eng ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Curriculum reform; Primary elementary years; School change; Teaching pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953376463     PISSN: 15702081     EISSN: 15731723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10671-016-9191-x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albright, J., & Kramer-Dahl, A. (2009). The legacy of instrumentality in policy and pedagogy in the teaching of English: The case of Singapore. Research Papers in Education, 24(2), 201–222.
2. Apple, M. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.
3. Bailey, R., Collins, D., Ford, P., Macnamara, A., Toms, M., & Pearce, G. (2010). Participant development on sport: An academic review. Leeds: Sports Coach UK.
4. BBC News. (2010). Scottish teaching unions raise curriculum pressure. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/8640844.stm.
5. Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141–161.
6. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2013). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. London: Routledge.
7. Dainton, S. (2005). Reclaiming teachers’ voices. Forum, 47(2), 159–167.
8. Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., & Lee, C. K. E. (Eds.). (2013). Globalization and the Singapore curriculum: From policy to classroom. Singapore: Springer.
9. English, F. W. (2010). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning, and leading the curriculum (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Sage.
10. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Columbia.
11. Goh, C. B., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In S. K. Lee, C. B. Goh, B. Fredriksen, & J. P. Tan (Eds.), Toward a better future. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
12. Gopinathan, S., & Lee, M. H. (2011). Challenging and co-opting globalisation: Singapore’s strategies in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 287–299.
13. Gopinathan, S., & Mardiana, A. B. (2013). Globalization, the state and curriculum reform. In Z. Deng, S. Gopinathan, & C. K.-E. Lee (Eds.), Globalization and the Singapore curriculum: From policy to classroom (pp. 15–32). Singapore: Springer.
14. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Hargreaves, A. & Shirley, D. (2011). The Far Side of educational change. Report commissioned by the Canadian Teachers’ Federation. Retrieved from http://www.ctffce.ca/publications/Briefs/Report_EducationReform2012_EN_web.pdf.
16. Hargreaves, A., Shirley, D., & Ng, P. T. (2012). Singapore: Innovation, communication, and paradox. In A. Hargreaves & D. Shirley (Eds.), The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
17. Hohmann, M., & Weikart, D. (1995). Educating young children: Active learning practices for preschool and child care programs. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
18. Koh, A. (2004). Singapore education in ‘new times’: Global/local imperatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 335–349.
19. Lee, H. L. (2004). Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s National Day Rally English speech on 19 August 2004. Singapore Government Press Release. Retrieved from http://app.sprinter.gov.sg/data/pr/2007081907.htm.
20. Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14.
21. Luttenberg, J., van Veen, K., & Imants, J. (2013). Looking for cohesion: The role of search for meaning in the interaction between teacher and reform. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 289–308.
22. Ministry of Education. (2009). Report of the Primary Education Review and Implementation Committee. Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Singapore/Singapore_PERI_2009.pdf.
23. Ministry of Education. (2011). Primary education: the way forward. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/primary/files/pri-education-booklet.pdf.
24. Ng, P. T. (2005). Students’ perception of change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(1), 77–92.
25. Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning—A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 763–780.
26. Priestley, M., & Humes, W. (2010). The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: Amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 345–361.
27. Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 61–78.
28. Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151–166.
29. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
30. Simons, P. R. J. (1997). Definitions and theories of active learning. In D. Stern & G. L. Huber (Eds.), Active learning for students and teachers: Reports from eight countries (OECD). Frankfurt amMain: Peter Lang.
31. Singapolitics (2013). Singapore in 20 years: A meritocracy of equals. interview with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam. Retrieved from http://app.mof.gov.sg/TemNewsroomDetail.aspx?pagesid=20090924508092100125&pagemode=live&type=media&cmpar_year=2013&news_sid=20130502691088829090&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.
32. Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Woon, C., & Kember, D. (2000). An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 381–389.
33. Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London: Harper and Row.
34. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Stephen, C., Ellis, J., & Martlew, J. (2010). Taking active learning into the primary school: A matter of new practices? International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(4), 315–329.
36. Stern, D., & Huber, G. L. (Eds.). (1997). Active learning for students and teachers: Reports from eight countries. Frankfurt amMain: Peter Lang.
37. Tan, C. (2008). Tensions in an ability-driven education. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 7–18). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
38. Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2007). Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 155–168.
39. Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(2), 91–103.
40. Teo, C. H. (2000). Dynamic school leaders and schools- making the best use of autonomy. Speech presented by Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence, at Mandarin Hotel, Singapore. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
41. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.