Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 243-265

  Range, Bret G ^a   Scherz, Susan ^a   Holt, Carleton R ^b   Young, Suzanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Formative; Principal perceptions; Summative; Supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959730185     PISSN: 18748597     EISSN: 18748600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (1997). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and inservice applications (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
2. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Ravitch, D., Rothstein, R., Shavelson, R. J., & Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. http://epi. 3cdn. net/724cd9a1eb91c40ff0_hwm6iij90. pdf. Accessed 15 December 2010.
3. Blase, J. R., & Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
4. Blase, J. R., & Blase, J. (2002). Teachers' perceptions of principals' instructional leadership and implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 256-264.
5. Bouchamma, Y. (2005). Evaluating teaching personnel. Which model of supervision do Canadian teachers prefer? Journal of Personnel. Evaluation in Education, 18, 289-308.
6. Bushman, J. (2006). Teachers as walk-through partners. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 58-61.
7. Chapman, M. C. (2007). Perceptions of Catholic elementary school principals and teachers regarding the classroom walk-through with reflective practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Widener University.
8. Chapter 29. (1994). Teacher performance evaluation systems. http://soswy. state. wy. us/Rules/RULES/403. pdf. Accessed 16 December 2010.
9. Cranston, J. (2009). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Eight themes from research on principals' perceptions of professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 90, 1-22.
10. Daresh, J. C. (2001). Supervision as proactive leadership (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
11. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, (2nd ed., rev.). New York: Wiley.
12. DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
13. Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., Poston, W. K., Jr., & English, F. W. (2010). Advancing the three-minute walk-through: Mastering reflective practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Eady, C. K., & Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Evaluation, supervision, and staff development under mandated reform: The perceptions and practices of rural middle school principals. The Rural Educator, 28(2), 1-7.
15. Fullan, M. (2003). The moral imperative of school leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
16. Garman, N. B. (1986). Reflection, the heart of clinical supervision: A modern rationale for professional practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 1-24.
17. Gentry, G. C. (2002). A case study: The issues high school principals encounter with instructional supervision. http://www. coe. uga. edu/leap/adminpolicy/dissertations_pdf/2002/GentryGregory. pdf. Accessed 30 November 2010.
18. Glanz, J. (2005). Action research as instructional supervision: Suggestions for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 89(643), 17-27.
19. Glatthorn, A. (1984). Differential supervision. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Glickman, C. D. (1990). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2005). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
22. Goldsberry, L. F. (1984). The realities of clinical supervision. Educational Leadership, 41(7), 12-15.
23. stcentury schools. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Gross, P. A. (2010). Not another trend: Secondary-level literacy coaching. The Clearing House, 83, 133-137.
25. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
26. Halverson, R., Kelley, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). Implementing teacher evaluation systems: How principals make sense of complex artifacts to shape local instructional practice. In C. Miskel & W. Hoy (Eds.), Educational Administration, Policy and Reform: Research and Measurement Research and Theory in Educational Administration. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
27. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
28. Hinchey, P. H. (2010). Getting teacher assessment right: What policymakers can learn from research. http://nepc. colorado. edu/publication/getting-teacher-assessment-right. Accessed 9 December 2010.
29. Iwanicki, E. F. (1998). Evaluation in supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 138-175). New York: Simon & Schuster.
30. Kersten, T. A., & Israel, M. S. (2005). Teacher evaluation: Principals' insights and suggestions for improvement. Planning and Changing, 36(1& 2), 47-67.
31. Keruskin, T. E. (2005). The perceptions of high school principals on student achievement by conducting walkthroughs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
32. Kyriakides, L., & Demetriou, D. (2007). Introducing a teacher evaluation system based on teacher effectiveness research: An investigation of stakeholders' perceptions. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 43-64.
33. Learning Point. (2007). Using the classroom walk-through as an instructional leadership strategy. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED495741).
34. Lee, G. V. (1991). Instructional leadership as collaborative sense-making. Theory into Practice, 15(2), 83-90.
35. MacBeath, J. (2004). International comparisons. Education Journal, 77, 21.
36. Marshal, K. (2008). It's time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. In J. Munro (Ed.), Educational Leadership (pp. 155-168). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Marshal, K. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. McQuarrie, F. O., & Wood, F. H. (1991). Instructional leadership: Making supervision meaningful. Theory into Practice, 30(2), 91-96.
39. Menuey, B. P. (2005). Teachers' perceptions of professional incompetence and barriers to the dismissal process. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 309-325.
40. Minnear-Peplinski, R. M. (2009). Principals' and teachers' perceptions of teacher supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Las Vegas: University of Nevada.
41. Mock, S. G., & Melnick, S. A. (1991). The marginal teacher: A survey of principals' attitudes. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED342739).
42. National Council on Teacher Quality. (2010). Bumping HR: Giving principals more say over staffing. http://www. nctq. org/tr3/docs/nctq_site_based_hiring. pdf. Accessed 15December 2010.
43. National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2002). Educational leadership constituent council standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors. Reston, VA: http://www. npbea. org/ELCC/ELCCStandards%20_5-02. pdf. Accessed 7 September 2010.
44. Neville, R. F., & Garman, N. B. (1999). The philosophical perspective on supervision. In G. Firth & E. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of Research on School Supervision (pp. 200-241). New York: NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
45. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
46. O'Rourke, A., Provenzano, J., Bellamy, T., & Ballek, K. (2007). Countdown to the principalship: A resource guide for beginning principals. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
47. Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (2004). Supervision for today's schools (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
48. Ovando, M. N. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 213-231.
49. Ovando, M. N. (2005). Building instructional leaders' capacity to deliver constructive feedback to teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(3), 171-183.
50. Ovando, M. N., & Ramirez, A. J. (2007). Principals' instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: Enhancing students' academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 85-110.
51. Painter, S. R. (2000). Principals' perceptions of barriers to teacher dismissal. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(3), 253-264.
52. Platt, A. D., Tripp, C. E., Ogden, W. R., & Fraser, R. G. (2000). The skillful leader: confronting mediocre teaching. Acton, MA: Ready About Press.
53. Protheroe, N. (2009). Using classroom walkthroughs to improve instruction. Principal, 88(4), 30-34.
54. Reeves, D. B. (2002). The daily disciplines of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
55. Reeves, D. B. (2004). Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
56. Robinson, V. (2007). Impact of leadership on students. The Leadership Challenge: Improving Learning in Schools. Keynote Address at Research Conference, 2007. Australian Council for Educational Research.
57. Robinson, V., Hohepa, M. & Lloyd, C. (2009.) School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
58. Shulman, V., Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2008). The New York City school reform: consequences for supervision of instruction. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 407-425.
59. Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision that improves teaching: Strategies and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
60. The Education Laws of Wyoming Annotated. (2008). Charlottesville. VA: Lexis Nexis.
61. The New Teacher Project. (2010). Teacher evaluation 2. 0. http://www. tntp. org/files/Teacher-Evaluation-Oct10F. pdf. Accessed 10 November 2010.
62. Tunison, S. D. (2001). Instructional supervision: The policy-practice rift. Journal of Educational Thought, 35(1), 83-108.
63. Ubben, G. C., Hughes, L. W., & Norris, C. J. (2004). The principal: Creative leadership for excellence in schools. Boston, MA; Allyn and Bacon.
64. Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2010). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectivenessfrom http://widgeteffect. org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect. pdf. Accessed 21 December 2010.
65. Wragg, E. C., Haynes, G. S., Wragg, C. M., & Chamberlin, R. P. (1999). The role of the head teacher (school principal) in addressing the problem of incompetent teachers. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED430300).
66. Zepeda, S. J. (2006a). Classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed., pp. 101-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
67. Zepeda, S. J. (2006b). High stakes supervision: We must do more. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(1), 61-73.
68. Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
69. Zepeda, S. J., & Kruskamp, B. (2007). High school department chairs: Perspectives on instructional supervision. The High School Journal, 90(4), 44-54.