Novel insight into the role of microbiota in colorectal surgery

Gut

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 738-749

  Bachmann, Radu ^a   Leonard, Daniel ^a   Delzenne, Nathalie ^b   Kartheuser, Alex ^a   Cani, Patrice D ^b,c  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology (WELBIO)   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; FORMYLPEPTIDE RECEPTOR; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; LAXATIVE;

ABDOMINAL INJURY; ACTINOBACTERIA; AKKERMANSIA MUCINIPHILA; BACTERIAL INFECTION; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; BACTERIUM; BACTEROIDETES; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIGESTIVE FUNCTION; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FIRMICUTES; FUSOBACTERIUM NUCLEATUM; HEALTHY LIFESTYLE; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTESTINE FLORA; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROTEOBACTERIA; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SHIGELLA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TISSUE REPAIR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERRUCOMICROBIA; WOUND HEALING; ANASTOMOSIS; COLON; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECTUM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURGERY;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CATHARTICS; COLON; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; HUMANS; RECTUM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 85013371575     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312569     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Zhang F, Luo W, Shi Y, et al. Should we standardize the 1,700-year-old fecal microbiota transplantation? Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1755; author reply p -6.
2. Peterson DA, Frank DN, Pace NR, et al. Metagenomic approaches for defining the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Host Microbe 2008;3:417-27.
3. Cani PD, Everard A. Talking microbes: when gut bacteria interact with diet and host organs. Mol Nutr Food Res 2016;60:58-66.
4. Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut 2016;65:330-9.
5. Delzenne NM, Cani PD, Everard A, et al. Gut microorganisms as promising targets for the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2015;58:2206-17.
6. Jalanka-Tuovinen J, Salonen A, Nikkilä J, et al. Intestinal microbiota in healthy adults: temporal analysis reveals individual and common core and relation to intestinal symptoms. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e23035.
7. Souza DG, Vieira AT, Soares AC, et al. The essential role of the intestinal microbiota in facilitating acute inflammatory responses. J Immunol 2004;173:4137-46.
8. Cani PD, Knauf C. How gut microbes talk to organs: the role of endocrine and nervous routes. Mol Metab 2016;5:743-52.
9. de Timary P, Leclercq S, Stärkel P, et al. A dysbiotic subpopulation of alcohol-dependent subjects. Gut microbes 2015;6:388-91.
10. Bindels LB, Neyrinck AM, Claus SP, et al. Synbiotic approach restores intestinal homeostasis and prolongs survival in leukaemic mice with cachexia. ISME J 2016;10:1456-70.
11. Karrasch T, Jobin C. Wound healing responses at the gastrointestinal epithelium: a close look at novel regulatory factors and investigative approaches. Z Gastroenterol 2009;47:1221-9.
12. Reinhardt C, Bergentall M, Greiner TU, et al. Tissue factor and PAR1 promote microbiota-induced intestinal vascular remodelling. Nature 2012;483:627-31.
13. Scales BS, Huffnagle GB. The microbiome in wound repair and tissue fibrosis. J Pathol 2013;229:323-31.
14. Arvans DL, Vavricka SR, Ren H, et al. Luminal bacterial flora determines physiological expression of intestinal epithelial cytoprotective heat shock proteins 25 and 72. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005;288:G696-704.
15. Derrien M, Collado MC, Ben-Amor K, et al. The Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila is an abundant resident of the human intestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:1646-8.
16. Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L, et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:9066-71.
17. Biedermann L, Rogler G. The intestinal microbiota: its role in health and disease. Eur J Pediatr 2015;174:151-67.
18. Hand TW. The role of the microbiota in shaping infectious immunity. Trends Immunol 2016;37:647-58.
19. Li H, Limenitakis JP, Fuhrer T, et al. The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nat Commun 2015;6:8292.
20. Hooper LV, Wong MH, Thelin A, et al. Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine. Science 2001;291:881-4.
21. Meneghin A, Hogaboam CM. Infectious disease, the innate immune response, and fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2007;117:530-8.
22. Gan BS, Kim J, Reid G, et al. Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 inhibits Staphylococcus aureus infection of surgical implants in rats. J Infect Dis 2002;185:1369-72.
23. Harrison F, Paul J, Massey RC, et al. Interspecific competition and siderophore-mediated cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J 2008;2:49-55.
24. Okada M. The influence of intestinal flora on wound healing in mice. Surg Today 1994;24:347-55.
25. Abreu MT. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:131-44.
26. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, et al. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 2004;118:229-41.
27. Cordeiro JV, Jacinto A. The role of transcription-independent damage signals in the initiation of epithelial wound healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013;14:249-62.
28. Chan EC, Jiang F, Peshavariya HM, et al. Regulation of cell proliferation by NADPH oxidase-mediated signaling: potential roles in tissue repair, regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Pharmacol Ther 2009;122:97-108.
29. Bylund J, Samuelsson M, Collins LV, et al. NADPH-oxidase activation in murine neutrophils via formyl peptide receptors. Exp Cell Res 2003;282:70-7.
30. de Paulis A, Prevete N, Rossi FW, et al. Helicobacter pylori Hp(2-20) promotes migration and proliferation of gastric epithelial cells by interacting with formyl peptide receptors in vitro and accelerates gastric mucosal healing in vivo. J Immunol 2009;183:3761-9.
31. Swanson PA II, Kumar A, Samarin S, et al. Enteric commensal bacteria potentiate epithelial restitution via reactive oxygen species-mediated inactivation of focal adhesion kinase phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:8803-8.
32. Sun J, Hobert ME, Rao AS, et al. Bacterial activation of beta-catenin signaling in human epithelia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004;287:G220-7.
33. Collier-Hyams LS, Sloane V, Batten BC, et al. Cutting edge: bacterial modulation of epithelial signaling via changes in neddylation of cullin-1. J Immunol 2005;175:4194-8.
34. Wentworth CC, Jones RM, Kwon YM, et al. Commensal-epithelial signaling mediated via formyl peptide receptors. Am J Pathol 2010;177:2782-90.
35. Kumar A, Wu H, Collier-Hyams LS, et al. The bacterial fermentation product butyrate influences epithelial signaling via reactive oxygen species-mediated changes in cullin-1 neddylation. J Immunol 2009;182:538-46.
36. Alam A, Leoni G, Quiros M, et al. The microenvironment of injured murine gut elicits a local pro-restitutive microbiota. Nat Microbiol 2016;1:15021.
37. Plovier H, Everard A, Druart C, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat Med 2017;23:107-113.
38. Kim EK, Sheetz KH, Bonn J, et al. A statewide colectomy experience: the role of full bowel preparation in preventing surgical site infection. Ann Surg 2014;259:310-14.
39. Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, et al. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015;262:416-25; discussion 23-5.
40. Scarborough JE, Mantyh CR, Sun Z, et al. Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces incisional surgical site infection and anastomotic leak rates after elective colorectal resection: an analysis of colectomy-targeted ACS NSQIP. Ann Surg 2015;262:331-7.
41. Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, et al. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252:863-8.
42. Dellinger EP. Should a scheduled colorectal operation have a mechanical bowel prep, preoperative oral antibiotics, both, or neither? Ann Surg 2015;261:1041-3.
43. Connor A, Tolan D, Hughes S, et al. Consensus guidelines for the safe prescription and administration of oral bowel-cleansing agents. Gut 2012;61:1525-32.
44. Strocchi A, Bond JH, Ellis C, et al. Colonic concentrations of hydrogen and methane following colonoscopic preparation with an oral lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:580-2.
45. Mai V, Greenwald B, Morris JG Jr, et al. Effect of bowel preparation and colonoscopy on post-procedure intestinal microbiota composition. Gut 2006;55:1822-3.
46. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Egger JF, et al. Morphologic alterations associated with mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:109-12.
47. Harrell L, Wang Y, Antonopoulos D, et al. Standard colonic lavage alters the natural state of mucosal-associated microbiota in the human colon. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e32545.
48. O'Brien CL, Allison GE, Grimpen F, et al. Impact of colonoscopy bowel preparation on intestinal microbiota. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e62815.
49. Jalanka J, Salonen A, Salojärvi J, et al. Effects of bowel cleansing on the intestinal microbiota. Gut 2015;64:1562-8.
50. Drago L, Toscano M, De Grandi R, et al. Persisting changes of intestinal microbiota after bowel lavage and colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;28:532-7.
51. Shobar RM, Velineni S, Keshavarzian A, et al. The effects of bowel preparation on microbiota-related metrics differ in health and in inflammatory bowel disease and for the mucosal and luminal microbiota compartments. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2016;7:e143.
52. Defazio J, Fleming ID, Shakhsheer B, et al. The opposing forces of the intestinal microbiome and the emerging pathobiome. Surg Clin North Am 2014;94:1151-61.
53. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012;486:207-14.
54. Pop M, Walker AW, Paulson J, et al. Diarrhea in young children from low-income countries leads to large-scale alterations in intestinal microbiota composition. Genome Biol 2014;15:R76.
55. Cohn I Jr, Rives JD. Antibiotic protection of colon anastomoses. Ann Surg 1955;141:707-17.
56. Ianiro G, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A. Antibiotics as deep modulators of gut microbiota: between good and evil. Gut 2016; doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312297. [Epub ahead of print 16 Aug 2016].
57. Knoop KA, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, et al. Antibiotics promote inflammation through the translocation of native commensal colonic bacteria. Gut 2016;65:1100-9.
58. Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(Suppl 1):4554-61.
59. Péerez-Cobas AE, Gosalbes MJ, Friedrichs A, et al. Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach. Gut 2013;62:1591-601.
60. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:910-25.
61. Swidsinski A, Dörffel Y, Loening-Baucke V, et al. Acute appendicitis is characterised by local invasion with Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorum. Gut 2011;60:34-40.
62. Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D. Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 2010;4:5.
63. Everard A, Lazarevic V, Derrien M, et al. Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice. Diabetes 2011;60:2775-86.
64. Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, et al. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:71-9.
65. Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, et al. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:8-15.
66. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1150-4.
67. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, et al. Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:82-92.e1.
68. Barbara G, Scaioli E, Barbaro MR, et al. Gut microbiota, metabolome and immune signatures in patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease. Gut 2016; doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312377. [Epub ahead of print 12 Sep 2016].
69. Price LB, Liu CM, Frankel YM, et al. Macroscale spatial variation in chronic wound microbiota: a cross-sectional study. Wound Repair Regen 2011;19:80-8.
70. Price LB, Liu CM, Melendez JH, et al. Community analysis of chronic wound bacteria using 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing: impact of diabetes and antibiotics on chronic wound microbiota. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e6462.
71. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, et al. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:43.
72. Han A, Zenilman JM, Melendez JH, et al. The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2011;19:532-41.
73. Frank DN, Wysocki A, Specht-Glick DD, et al. Microbial diversity in chronic open wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:163-72.
74. Gjødsbøl K, Skindersoe ME, Christensen JJ, et al. No need for biopsies: comparison of three sample techniques for wound microbiota determination. Int Wound J 2012;9:295-302.
75. Shogan BD, Smith DP, Christley S, et al. Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function. Microbiome 2014;2:35.
76. Park SY, Shin YP, Kim CH, et al. Immune evasion of Enterococcus faecalis by an extracellular gelatinase that cleaves C3 and iC3b. J Immunol 2008;181:6328-36.
77. Wallace AJ, Stillman TJ, Atkins A, et al. E. coli hemolysin E (HlyE, ClyA, SheA): X-ray crystal structure of the toxin and observation of membrane pores by electron microscopy. Cell 2000;100:265-76.
78. Smith JL, Bayles DO. The contribution of cytolethal distending toxin to bacterial pathogenesis. Crit Rev Microbiol 2006;32:227-48.
79. Falzano L, Filippini P, Travaglione S, et al. Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 blocks cell cycle G2/M transition in uroepithelial cells. Infect Immun 2006;74:3765-72.
80. Korea CG, Badouraly R, Prevost MC, et al. Escherichia coli K-12 possesses multiple cryptic but functional chaperone-usher fimbriae with distinct surface specificities. Environ Microbiol 2010;12:1957-77.
81. Tran Van Nhieu G, Bourdet-Sicard R, Duménil G, et al. Bacterial signals and cell responses during Shigella entry into epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol 2000;2:187-93.
82. Waters CM, Antiporta MH, Murray BE, et al. Role of the Enterococcus faecalis GelE protease in determination of cellular chain length, supernatant pheromone levels, and degradation of fibrin and misfolded surface proteins. J Bacteriol 2003;185:3613-23.
83. Boiko VV, Krivorot'ko IV, Peev SB, et al. [Role of collagen in intestinal anastomosis formation after the rectum resection]. Klin Khir 2009:13-9.
84. Kaffarnik MF, Urban M, Hopt UT, et al. Impact of enterococcus on immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with perforation of the small or large bowel. Technol Health Care 2012;20:37-48.
85. Komen N, Slieker J, Willemsen P, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. The Appeal-study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:15-21.
86. Tomita H, Ike Y. Tissue-specific adherent Enterococcus faecalis strains that show highly efficient adhesion to human bladder carcinoma T24 cells also adhere to extracellular matrix proteins. Infect Immun 2004;72:5877-85.
87. Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, et al. Importance of the collagen adhesin ace in pathogenesis and protection against Enterococcus faecalis experimental endocarditis. PLoS Pathog 2010;6:e1000716.
88. Nallapareddy SR, Qin X, Weinstock GM, et al. Enterococcus faecalis adhesin, ace, mediates attachment to extracellular matrix proteins collagen type IV and laminin as well as collagen type I. Infect Immun 2000;68:5218-24.
89. Mäkinen PL, Clewell DB, An F, et al. Purification and substrate specificity of a strongly hydrophobic extracellular metalloendopeptidase ("gelatinase") from Streptococcus faecalis (strain 0G1-10). J Biol Chem 1989;264:3325-34.
90. Salazar N, Arboleya S, Valdes L, et al. The human intestinal microbiome at extreme ages of life. Dietary intervention as a way to counteract alterations. Front Genet 2014;5:406.
91. Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O'Sullivan O, et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(Suppl 1):4586-91.
92. Mennigen R, Nolte K, Rijcken E, et al. Probiotic mixture VSL#3 protects the epithelial barrier by maintaining tight junction protein expression and preventing apoptosis in a murine model of colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2009;296:G1140-9.
93. Mack DR, Ahrne S, Hyde L, et al. Extracellular MUC3 mucin secretion follows adherence of Lactobacillus strains to intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Gut 2003;52:827-33.
94. Okada M, Bothin C, Kanazawa K, et al. Experimental study of the influence of intestinal flora on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1999;86:961-5.
95. Lopetuso LR, Petito V, Zambrano D, et al. Gut Microbiota: a key modulator of intestinal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis 2016;34:202-9.
96. Stappenbeck TS, Hooper LV, Gordon JI. Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:15451-5.
97. Schardey HM, Joosten U, Finke U, et al. [Cost savings by disinfection for prevention of surgical wound dehiscence after gastrectomy]. Chirurg 1997;68:416-24.
98. Schardey HM, Joosten U, Finke U, et al. The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Surg 1997;225:172-80.
99. Olivas AD, Shogan BD, Valuckaite V, et al. Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e44326.
100. Wu L, Zaborina O, Zaborin A, et al. High-molecular-weight polyethylene glycol prevents lethal sepsis due to intestinal Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gastroenterology 2004;126:488-98.
101. Morks AN, Havenga K, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, et al. Thirty-seven patients treated with the C-seal: protection of stapled colorectal anastomoses with a biodegradable sheath. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:1433-8.
102. van Praagh JB, de Goffau MC, Bakker IS, et al. Intestinal microbiota and anastomotic leakage of stapled colorectal anastomoses: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2259-65.
103. Krezalek MA, Skowron KB, Guyton KL, et al. The intestinal microbiome and surgical disease. Curr Probl Surg 2016;53:257-93.