Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: An in vitro study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 165-172

  Schaefer, Oliver ^a   Schmidt, Monika ^b   Goebel, Roland ^b   Kuepper, Harald ^a,b  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b Policlinic of Prosthetic Dentistry and Material Science ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPREGUM; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MOLAR; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILOXANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84865735500     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60141-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. M Balkenhol, P Ferger, B Wöstmann Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity Int J Prosthodont 20 2007 573 575
2. MJ Cayouette, JO Burgess, RE Jones Jr., CH Yuan Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays Quintessence Int 34 2003 189 198
3. JA Ceyhan, GH Johnson, X Lepe The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 143 149
4. AH Kang, GH Johnson, X Lepe, JC Wataha Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays J Prosthet Dent 101 2009 332 341
5. E Kotsiomiti, A Tzialla, K Hatjivasiliou Accuracy and stability of impression materials subjected to chemical disinfection - a literature review J Oral Rehabil 35 2008 291 299
6. H Lu, B Nguyen, JM Powers Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials J Prosthet Dent 92 2004 151 154
7. JC Ragain, ML Grosko, M Raj, TN Ryan, WM Johnston Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations Int J Prosthodont 13 2000 214 220
8. B Wöstmann, P Rehmann, M Balkenhol Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays Int J Prosthodont 22 2009 158 160
9. GH Johnson, LA Mancl, ER Schwedhelm, DR Verhoef, X Lepe Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays J Prosthet Dent 103 2010 13 22
10. JC Berg, GH Johnson, X Lepe, S Adan-Plaza Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 150 161
11. M Balkenhol, S Haunschild, C Erbe, B Wostmann Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials J Prosthet Dent 103 2010 288 294
12. B Wöstmann, P Rehmann, D Trost, M Balkenhol Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns J Dent 36 2008 508 512
13. ML Aguilar, A Elias, CE Vizcarrondo, WJ Psoter Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants J Prosthet Dent 103 2010 202 209
14. JH Kwon, YH Son, CH Han, S Kim Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis J Prosthet Dent 105 2011 367 373
15. GH Johnson, X Lepe, TC Aw The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 354 364
16. RG Luthardt, MH Walter, A Weber, R Koch, H Rudolph Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial Int J Prosthodont 21 2008 322 327
17. MJ German, TE Carrick, JF McCabe Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties Dent Mater 24 2008 951 956
18. F Rupp, J Geis-Gerstorfer Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials Int J Prosthodont 23 2010 552 554
19. CS Petrie, MP Walker, AM O'Mahony, P Spencer Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 365 372
20. M Balkenhol, B Wöstmann, M Kanehira, WJ Finger Shark fin test and impression quality: a correlation analysis J Dent 35 2007 409 415
21. MN Mandikos Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use Aust Dent J 43 1998 428 434
22. A Ender, A Mehl Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study Int J Comput Dent 14 2011 11 21
23. RG Luthardt, R Loos, S Quaas Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression Int J Comput Dent 8 2005 283 294
24. AS Persson, A Oden, M Andersson, G Sandborgh-Englund Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness Dent Mater 25 2009 929 936
25. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association ANSI/ADA Specification 19/ISO 4823:2000. Dental elastomeric impression materials 2004 ADA Chicago Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/ ISOstore/store.html
26. X Lepe, GH Johnson, JC Berg, TC Aw Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials J Prosthet Dent 79 1998 495 502
27. O Moldovan, RG Luthardt, N Corcodel, H Rudolph Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings Dent Mater 27 2011 1273 1278
28. CP Wadhwani, GH Johnson, X Lepe, AJ Raigrodski Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials J Prosthet Dent 93 2005 530 539
29. TJ Bomberg, RA Hatch, W Hoffman Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays J Prosthet Dent 54 1985 170 172
30. J Valderhaug, F Floystrand Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays J Prosthet Dent 52 1984 514 517
31. RS Kess, EC Combe, BS Sparks Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials J Prosthet Dent 84 2000 98 102
32. BJ Millar, SM Dunne, M Nesbit A comparison of three wetting agents used to facilitate the pouring of dies J Prosthet Dent 74 1995 341 344
33. BJ Millar, SM Dunne, PB Robinson The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions J Prosthet Dent 77 1997 54 56
34. PB Robinson, SM Dunne, BJ Millar An in vitro study of a surface wetting agent for addition reaction silicone impressions J Prosthet Dent 71 1994 390 393
35. MC Peters, R Delong, MR Pintado, U Pallesen, V Qvist, WH Douglas Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear J Dent 27 1999 479 485
36. JC Türp, CS Greene, JR Strub Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts J Oral Rehabil 35 2008 446 453
37. SD Phillips Report of a special test. NIST test No. 681/280055-10 October 8, 2010 Available at http://www.geomagic.com/download-file/view/1133/104/ accessed November 11, 2011.