Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 310-315

  Cho, Seok Hwan ^a   Schaefer, Oliver ^b   Thompson, Geoffrey A ^a   Guentsch, Arndt ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; DENTAL MATERIAL; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CASTING; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE DESIGN; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN;

ALGORITHMS; CALCIUM SULFATE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84933049111     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.027     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Persson ASK, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1123-30.
2. Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103: 13-22.
3. Kwon JH, Son YH, Han CH, Kim S. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105: 367-73.
4. Berg JC, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Adan-Plaza S. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:150-61.
5. Luthardt RG, Walter MH, Weber A, Koch R, Rudolph H. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1-and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:322-7.
6. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. Oper Dent 2008;33:644-50.
7. Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:172-8.
8. Gomez-Polo M, Celemin A, del Rio J, Sanchez A. Influence of technique and pouring time on dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impressions. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:353-6.
9. Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 2002:98-108.
10. Stober T, Johnson GH, Schmitter M. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:228-39.
11. Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:165-72.
12. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions: an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
13. Jäger K, Vögtlin C. Digital workflow with the chair-side oral scanner COS and Lava-technology. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2012;122:307-15.
14. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008;35:191-201.
15. Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthodont 2009;79:30-6.
16. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS. Acuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26: 161-3.
17. Guth J, Kuel C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17:1201-8.
18. Flugge T, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger M. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144: 471-8.
19. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28: 320-6.
20. Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:530-9.
21. Valderhaug J, Floystrand F. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:514-7.
22. Millar BJ, Dunne SM, Robinson PB. The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:54-6.
23. Luthardt RG, Koch R, Rudolph H, Walter MH. Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. Dent Mater 2006;22:69-76.