Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 261-267

  Burhardt, Lukasz ^a   Livas, Christos ^a   Kerdijk, Wouter ^a   van der Meer, Wicher Joerd ^a   Ren, Yijin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ALGINATES; CHILD; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84994817312     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1 McGuinness, N.J., Stephens, C.D., Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod 19 (1992), 227–232.
2. 2 Fleming, P.S., Marinho, V., Johal, A., Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14 (2011), 1–16.
3. 3 Cuperus, A.M., Harms, M.C., Rangel, F.A., Bronkhorst, E.M., Schols, J.G., Breuning, K.H., Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142 (2012), 308–313.
4. 4 Akyalcin, S., Cozad, B.E., English, J.D., Colville, C.D., Laman, S., Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 916–922.
5. 5 Grunheid, T., McCarthy, S.D., Larson, B.E., Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146 (2014), 673–682.
6. 6 Flugge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S., Metzger, M.C., Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 471–478.
7. 7 Naidu, D., Freer, T.J., Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 304–310.
8. 8 Wiranto, M.G., Engelbrecht, W.P., Tutein Nolthenius, H.E., van der Meer, W.J., Ren, Y., Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143 (2013), 140–147.
9. 9 Hazeveld, A., Huddleston Slater, J.J., Ren, Y., Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145 (2014), 108–115.
10. 10 Hacker, T., Heydecke, G., Reissmann, D.R., Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J Dent 43 (2015), 51–57.
11. 11 Farah, J.W., Brown, L., Comparison of the fit of crowns based on digital impressions with 3M ESPE lava chairside oral scanner C.O.S. vs. traditional impressions. Dent Adv Res Report 22 (2009), 1–3.
12. 12 Schepke, U., Meijer, H.J., Kerdijk, W., Cune, M.S., Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 403–406.e1.
13. 13 Wismeijer, D., Mans, R., van Genuchten, M., Reijers, H.A., Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (intraoral scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 25 (2014), 1113–1118.
14. 14 Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14, 2014, 10.
15. 15 Huang, G.J., Marston, B.E., del Aguila, M.A., Orthodontic care in an insured population in Washington: demographic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004), 741–746.
16. 16 Van Linden van den Heuvell, G.F., Ter Pelkwijk, B.J., Stegenga, B., Development of the gagging problem assessment: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 35 (2008), 196–202.
17. 17 ten Berge, M., Hoogstraten, J., Veerkamp, J.S., Prins, P.J., The dental subscale of the children's fear survey schedule: a factor analytic study in the Netherlands. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26 (1998), 340–343.
18. 18 Brooks, J.L., Counterbalancing for serial order carryover effects in experimental condition orders. Psychol Methods 17 (2012), 600–614.
19. 19 Keim, R.G., Gottlieb, E.L., Vogels, D.S. 3rd, Vogels, P.B., 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 48 (2014), 607–630.
20. 20 Ferracane, J.L., Materials in dentistry: principles and applications. 2001, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
21. 21 3M. 3M™ ESPE™ lava™ chairside oral scanner user guide version 2.0—reviewing the scan, page 51. Available at: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/685884O/lava-chairside-oral-scanner-user-guide-version-2-0.pdf. Updated 2015. Accessed June 18, 2015.
22. 22 Joda, T., Bragger, U., Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015 Apr 12 [Epub ahead of print].
23. 23 van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y., Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e43312.
24. 24 Sirona. CEREC: right for everyone. Available at: http://www.sirona.com/en/news-events/campaigns-and-promotions/cerec-packages/premium/cerec-ac-with-omnicam-premium/. Updated 2015. Accessed June 18, 2015.
25. 25 Strauman. iTero™ intra-oral scanner. Available at: http://www.straumann.nl/en/dental-professionals/straumann-products-and-solutions/digital-solutions/intra-oral-scanning.html. Updated 2015. Accessed June 17, 2015.
26. 26 Benefit sirona intra-oral scanners: patient's retention. Available at: http://www.cerec-connect.co.uk/for-dental-practices/dental-practice-benefit/. Updated 2015. Accessed June 18, 2015.
27. 27 3M. Lava™ C.O.S.—comfortable and precise digital impressions in 3D. Available at: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/608754O/lava-chairside-oral-scanner-c-o-s-patientfolder-ebu.pdf. Updated 2015. Accessed June 24, 2015.
28. 28 Elbourne, D.R., Altman, D.G., Higgins, J.P., Curtin, F., Worthington, H.V., Vail, A., Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 31 (2002), 140–149.