Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 853-862

  Giménez González, Beatriz ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b   Martínez Rus, Francisco ^a   Pradíes, Guillermo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Dental implant; Digital impression; Implant angulation; Implant depth; Intraoral scanner

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; LASER; MAXILLA; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; LASERS; MAXILLA;

EID: 84921991697     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3343     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 2:75-82.
2. Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113.
3. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implantsupported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:151-158.
4. Wenneberg A, Albrektsson T. Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2010;38:286-294.
5. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: Parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of the three-unit implant supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-473.
6. Del Corso M, Abà G, Vazquez L, Dargaud J, Ehrenfest DMD. Optical three-dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: An in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:214-221.
7. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:441-451.
8. Winter W, Mohrle S, Hdst S, Karl M. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;25:947-952.
9. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-44.
10. Taylor TK, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future direction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:66-75.
11. Ono S, Yamaguchi S, Kusumoto N, Nakano T, Sohmura T, Yatani H. Optical impression method to measure three-dimensional position and orientation of dental implants using an optical tracker. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;19:1-6.
12. Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations J Prosthet Dent 2012;87:528-535.
13. Winter W, Dickinson AJ, Wichmann MG. Different bone loading patterns due to fixation of three-unit and five-unit implant prostheses. Aust Dent 2007;52:47-54.
14. Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;15:351-359.
15. Akca K, Akkocaoglum M, Cömert A, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:101-109.
16. Jivraj S, Chee W. Treatment planning of implants in posterior quadrants. Br Dent J 2006;201:13-23.
17. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:506-515.
18. Eliasson A, örtorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent and Rel Res 2011;14:30-38.
19. Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;23:676-681.
20. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-291.
21. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, Lee KW. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:747-755.
22. Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:761-768.
23. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: An in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:63-76.
24. Jan HK, Kim S, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HK. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prosthesis with various divergent angles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1011-1015.
25. Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28:228-240.
26. Jo SH, Kim S, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HK. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-133.
27. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:7-13.
28. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;22:111-115.
29. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140:1301-1304.
30. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005; 26:283-294.
31. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-431.
32. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: The end of trays and putty? Dent Implant Update 2008;19:1-4.
33. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
34. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559.
35. Ender A, Melh A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions- An in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
36. Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS ONE 2012;7(8):e43312. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
37. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow- The comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013 Dec;17(9):2119-2125.
38. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, Yeo IS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-163.
39. Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
40. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109:121-128.
41. International Organization for Standardization. 10360-2: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS). Acceptance and Reverification tests for Coordinated Measuring Machines (CMMs). Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Linear Dimensions. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
42. Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between 'virtual' and 'physical' assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011;14:175-182.
43. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Invest 2012 May;17(4):1201-1208.