Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research

Administrative Science Quarterly

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 105-139

  Leahey, Erin ^a   Beckman, Christine M ^b   Stanko, Taryn L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

creativity; interdisciplinary research; organizational ecology; organizational innovation; scientific careers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011685051     PISSN: 00018392     EISSN: 19303815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0001839216665364     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Abbott A., 2001 Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Aharonson B. S., Schilling M. A., 2016 “Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution.” Research Policy, 45: 81–96.
3. Allison P. D., Long J. S., 1987 “Interuniversity mobility of academic scientists.” American Sociological Review, 52: 643–652.
4. Allison P. D., Waterman R., 2002 “Fixed effects negative binomial regression models.” In Stolzenberg R. M., (ed.), Sociology Methodology: 247–265. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Anderson T. W., 1957 “Maximum likelihood estimates for multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52: 200–203.
6. Azoulay P., Stuart T., Wang Y., 2014 “Matthew: Effect or fable?” Management Science, 60: 92–109.
7. Beckman C. M., 2006 “The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 741–758.
8. Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., 2002 “Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 92–124.
9. Biancani S., McFarland D. A., Dahlander L., 2014 “The semiformal organization.” Organization Science, 25: 1306–1324.
10. Birnbaum P. H., 1981 “Integration and specialization in academic research.” Academy of Management Journal, 24: 487–503.
11. Bjork B., Solomon D., 2013 “The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals.” Journal of Informetrics, 7: 914–923.
12. Boardman C., Bozeman B., 2007 “Role strain in university research centers.” Journal of Higher Education, 78: 430–463.
13. Boardman C. P., Corley E. A., 2008 “University research centers and the composition of research collaborations.” Research Policy, 37: 900–913.
14. Boix Mansilla V., 2006 “Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration.” Research Evaluation, 15: 17–29.
15. Boix Mansilla V., Lamont M., Sato K., 2016 “Shared cognitive–emotional–interactional platforms: Markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations.” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 41: 571–612.
16. Bollen K. A., 1989 Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
17. Bozeman B., Dietz J., Gaughan M., 2001 “Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation.” International Journal of Technology Management, 22: 636–655.
18. Brint S., 2005 “Creating the future: ‘New directions’ in American research universities.” Minerva, 43: 23–50.
19. Carayol N., Nguyen Thi T. U., 2005 “Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?” Research Evaluation, 14: 70–79.
20. Carnabuci G., Bruggerman J., 2009 “Knowledge specialization, knowledge brokerage, and the uneven growth of knowledge domains.” Social Forces, 88: 607–642.
21. Carroll G. R., 1985 “Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations.” American Journal of Sociology, 90: 1262–1283.
22. Clemens E. S., Powell W. W., McIlwaine K., Okamoto D., 1995 “Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputation.” American Journal of Sociology, 101: 433–494.
23. Cole J. R., Zuckerman H., 1984 “The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists.” Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2: 217–258.
24. Corley E., Gaughan M., 2005 “Scientists’ participation in university research centers: What are the gender differences?” Journal of Technology Transfer, 30: 371–381.
25. Cummings J. N., Kiesler S., 2005 “Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries.” Social Studies of Science, 35: 703–722.
26. Cummings J. N., Kiesler S., 2007 “Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations.” Research Policy, 36: 1620–1634.
27. Dahlander L., Frederiksen L., 2012 “The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities.” Organization Science, 23: 988–1007.
28. Diamond A. M., 1986 “What is a citation worth?” Journal of Human Resources, 21: 200–215.
29. Evans J. A., 2008 “Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship.” Science, 321: 395–399.
30. Ferber M., 1986 “Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit?” Signs, 11: 381–389.
31. Fleming L., 2001 “Recombinant uncertainty in technological search.” Management Science, 47: 117–132.
32. Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D., 2007 “Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 443–475.
33. Fleming L., Sorenson O., 2004 “Science as a map in technological search.” Strategic Management Journal, 25: 909–928.
34. Fleming L., Waguespack D. M., 2007 “Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities.” Organization Science, 18: 165–180.
35. Foster J. G., Rzhetsky A., Evans J. A., 2015 “Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies.” American Sociological Review, 80: 875–908.
36. Freeman J., Hannan M. T., 1983 “Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations.” American Journal of Sociology, 88: 1116–1145.
37. Gans J. S., Murray F., 2015 “Credit history: The changing nature of scientific credit.” In Jaffe A., Jones B., (eds.), The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy: 107–134. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Gaughan M., Ponomariov B., 2008 “Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: Using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists.” Research Evaluation, 17: 103–110.
39. Gross N., 2009 “A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms.” American Sociological Review, 74: 358–379.
40. Hamilton K. S., Narin F., Olivastro D., 2005 Using Bibliometrics to Measure Multidisciplinarity. Westmont, NJ: ipIQ, Inc.
41. Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H., 1989 Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R., 2007 Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Hargadon A. B., 2002 “Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation.” In Kramer R. M., Staw B. M., (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 24: 41–85. New York: Elsevier/JAI.
44. Hsu G., 2006a “Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 15: 467–496.
45. Hsu G., 2006b “Jack of all trades and master of none: Audences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 420–450.
46. Hsu G., Hannan M. T., Kocak O., 2009 “Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests.” American Sociological Review, 74: 150–169.
47. Hsu G., Negro G., Perretti F., 2012 “Hybrids in Hollywood: A study of genre spanning in the U.S. film industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 21: 1427–1450.
48. Jacobs J. A., Frickel S., 2009 “Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology, 35: 43–65.
49. Kaplan S., Milde J., Cowan R. S., 2016 “Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research.” Academy of Management Journal, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.0809.
50. Knorr Cetina K., 1980 “The scientist as an analogical reasoner.” In Knorr-Cetina K., Krohn R. G., Whitley R., (eds.), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation: 25–52. Boston: Kluwer.
51. Kovács B., Hannan M. T., 2015 “Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning.” Sociological Science, 2: 252–286.
52. Kovács B., Johnson R., 2014 “Contrasting alternative explanations for the negative effects of category spanning: A study of restaurant reviews and menus in San Francisco.” Strategic Organization, 12: 7–37.
53. Lamont M., 2009 How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Lamont M., Mallard G., Guetzkow J., 2006 “Beyond blind faith: Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation.” Research Evaluation, 15: 43–55.
55. Larivière V., Gingras Y., 2010 “On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61: 126–131.
56. Larivière V., Haustein S., Börner K., 2015 “Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.” PLoS ONE 10:e0122565.
57. Latour B., 1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Leahey E., 2006 “Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link.” Gender and Society, 20: 754–780.
59. Leahey E., 2007 “Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings.” American Sociological Review, 72: 533–561.
60. Leahey E., 2016 “From solo investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration.” Annual Review of Sociology, 42: 81–100.
61. Leahey E., Moody J., 2014 “Sociological innovation through subfield integration.” Social Currents, 1: 228–256.
62. Lingo E. L., O’Mahony S., 2010 “Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 47–81.
63. Lo J. Y.-C., Kennedy M. T., 2015 “Approval in nanotechnology patents: Micro and macro factors that affect reactions to category blending.” Organization Science, 26: 119–139.
64. Lynn F. B., 2014 “Diffusing through disciplines: Insiders, outsiders, and socially influenced citation behavior.” Social Forces, 93: 355–382.
65. Maliniaka D., Powers R., Walter B. F., 2013 “The gender citation gap in international relations.” International Organization, 67: 889–922.
66. McBee D. J., Leahey E., 2016 “New directions in interdisciplinary training: Trials and tribulations.” In Frickel S., Albert M., Prainsack B., (eds.), Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Theory and Practice across Disciplines: ch. 1. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press (in press).
67. McBrier D. B., 2003 “Gender and career dynamics within a segmented professional labor market: The case of law academia.” Social Forces, 81: 1201–1266.
68. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M., 2001 “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.
69. Merton R. K., 1977 “The sociology of science: An episodic memoir.” In Merton R. K., Gaston J., (eds.), The Sociology of Science in Europe: 3–144. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
70. Millar M. M., Dillman D. A., 2012 “Trends in interdisciplinary dissertation research: An analysis of the survey of earned doctorates.” NCSES Working paper #12-200.
71. Montpetit É., Blais A., Foucault M., 2008 “What does it take for a Canadian political scientist to be cited?” Social Science Quarterly, 89: 802–816.
72. Murray F., 2010 “The Oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions.” American Journal of Sociology, 116: 341–388.
73. Najman J. M., Hewitt B., 2003 “The validity of publication and citation counts for sociology and other selected disciplines.” Journal of Sociology, 39: 62–80.
74. National Academies of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine 2005 Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
75. National Research Council 2014 Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
76. Negro G., Hannan M. T., Rao H., 2010 “Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 19: 1397–1425.
77. Negro G., Leung M. D., 2013 “Actual and perceptual effects of category spanning.” Organization Science, 24: 684–696.
78. Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H., 1985 Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
79. Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W., 2003 “The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity.” Research Policy, 32: 1695–1711.
80. Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R., 1999 “Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1–28.
81. Phillips D. J., 2011 “Jazz and the disconnected: City structural disconnectedness and the emergence of the jazz canon (1897 to 1933).” American Journal of Sociology, 117: 420–483.
82. Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E., 2001 “Middle status conformity: Theoretical restatement and evidence from two markets.” American Journal of Sociology, 107: 379–429.
83. Poincare H., 1952 “Mathematical creation.” In Ghiselin B., (ed.), The Creative Process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
84. Ponomariov B. L., Boardman P. C., 2010 “Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital.” Research Policy, 39: 613–624.
85. Pontikes E. G., 2012 “Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 81–118.
86. Porter A. L., Cohen A. S., Roessner J. D., Perreault M., 2007 “Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity.” Scientometrics, 72: 117–147.
87. Porter A. L., Rafols I., 2009 “Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time.” Scientometrics, 81: 719–745.
88. Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L., 1996 “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
89. Pray L., 2002 “Interdisciplinarity in science and engineering: Academia in transition.” Science Career Magazine. Accessed at http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2002/01/interdisciplinarity-science-and-engineering-academia-transition.
90. Prpic K., 2002 “Gender and productivity differentials in science.” Scientometrics, 55: 27–58.
91. Rafols I., Meyer M., 2010 “Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience.” Scientometrics, 82: 263–287.
92. Rao H., Monin P., Durand R., 2005 “Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy.” American Sociological Review, 70: 968–991.
93. Reskin B., 2003 “Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality.” American Sociological Review, 68: 1–21.
94. Rhoten D., Parker A., 2006 “Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path.” Science, 306: 2046.
95. Rhoten D., Pfirman S., 2007 “Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences.” Research Policy, 36: 56–75.
96. Rinia E., van Leeuwen T., van Raan A. F., 2002 “Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics.” Scientometrics, 53: 241–248.
97. Rosenkopf L., Almeida P., 2003 “Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility.” Management Science, 49: 751–766.
98. Ruef M., Patterson K., 2009 “Credit and classification: Defining industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 486–520.
99. Sá C. M., 2008 “‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in US research universities.” Higher Education, 55: 537–552.
100. Sanz L. M., Bordons M., Zulueta M. A., 2001 “Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas.” Research Evaluation, 10: 47–58.
101. Sauer R. D., 1988 “Estimates of the returns to quality and coauthorship in economic academia.” Journal of Political Economy, 96: 855–866.
102. Schilling M. A., 2005 “A ‘small-world’ network model of cognitive insight.” Creativity Research Journal, 17: 131–154.
103. Schilling M. A., Green E., 2011 “Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences.” Research Policy, 40: 1321–1331.
104. Schumpeter J. A., 1912 The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105. Sgourev S. V., Althuizen N., 2014 “‘Notable’ or ‘not able’: When are acts of inconsistency rewarded?” American Sociological Review, 79: 282–302.
106. Shi X., Adamic L. A., Tseng B. L., Clarkson G. S., 2009 “The impact of boundary spanning scholarly publications and patents.” PloS ONE 4:e6547.
107. Shrum W., Genuth J., Chompalov I., 2007 Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Singh J., Fleming L., 2010 “Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?” Management Science, 56: 41–56.
109. Sobey A. J., Townsend N. C., Metcalf C. D., Bruce K. D., Fazi F. M., 2013 “Incorporation of early career researchers within multidisciplinary research at academic institutions.” Research Evaluation, 22: 169–178.
110. Trapido D., 2015 “How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: The role of consistent identities.” Research Policy, 44: 1488–1500.
111. Uzzi B., Mukherjee S., Stringer M., Jones B., 2013 “Atypical combinations and scientific impact.” Science, 342: 468–472.
112. van Dalen H., Henkens K., 2005 “Signals in science—On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science.” Scientometrics, 64: 209–233.
113. van Rijnsoever F. J., Hessels L. K., 2011 “Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration.” Research Policy, 40: 463–472.
114. Wagner C. S., Roessner J. D., Bobb K., Thompson Klein J., Boyack K. W., Keyton J., Rafols I., Börner K., 2011 “Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature.” Journal of Informetrics, 5: 14–26.
115. Wagner-Dobler R., 1997 “Self-organization of scientific specialization and diversification: A quantitative case study.” Social Studies of Science, 27: 147–170.
116. Wang J., 2013 “Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation.” Scientometrics, 94: 851–872.
117. Weick K. E., 1979 The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
118. Weitzman M. L., 1998 “Recombinant growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 331–360.
119. Whitley R., 2000 The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120. Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B., 2007 “The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.” Science, 316: 1036–1039.
121. Yegros-Yegros A., Rafols I., D’Este P., 2015 “Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity.” PLoS ONE, 10: e0135095.
122. Zitt M., Ramanana-Rahary S., Bassecoulard E., 2005 “Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation.” Scientometrics, 63: 373–401.
123. Zuckerman E. W., 1999 “The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount.” American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1398–1438.
124. Zuckerman E. W., 2005 “Typecasting and generalism in firm and market: Genre-based career concentration in the feature film industry, 1933–1995.” In Jones C., Thornton P. H., (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23: 173–216. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
125. Zuckerman E. W., Kim T.-Y., Ukanwa K., von Rittmann J., 2003 “Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market.” American Journal of Sociology, 108: 1018–1074.