Role strain in university research centers

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 430-463

  Boardman, Craig ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^b  

^a Science and Technology Policy Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547307450     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2007.0020     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andrews, F. (1979). Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge: New York University Press.
2. Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2001). Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy, 30, 1221-1235.
3. Barber, B. (1953). Science and the Social Order. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4. Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. (1966). Role theory: Concepts and research. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Blissett, M. (1972). Politics in science. Boston: Little, Brown.
6. Blume, S. S. (1974). Toward a political sociology of science. New York: Free Press.
7. Boardman, C., & Ponomariov, B. (2007). Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially-relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 51-70.
8. Bowen, W. G., & Sosa, J. A. (1989). Prospects for faculty in the arts and sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Box, S., & Cotgrove, S. (1966). Scientific identity, occupational selection and role strain. British Journal of Sociology, 17, 20-28.
10. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
11. Bozeman, B., & Melkers, J. (1993). Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practice. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2003). Managing the new multipurpose, multidiscipline university research center: Institutional innovation in the academic community. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
13. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2004). The NSF engineering research centers and the university-industry research revolution: A brief history featuring and interview with Erich Bloch. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 365-375.
14. Bozeman, B., & Crow, M., (1990). The environments of U.S. R&D laboratories: Political and market influences. Policy Sciences, 23, 25-56.
15. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 636-655.
16. Braxton, J. M., & Del Favero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 19-31.
17. Brooks, H. (1978). The problems of research priorities. Daedalus, 107, 171-190.
18. Colbeck, C. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 647-671.
19. Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1987). R&D laboratories' environmental contexts: Are the government lab-industrial lab stereotypes still valid? Research Policy, 13, 329-355.
20. Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R&D laboratories in the U.S. national innovation system. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Diamond, R. M. (1993). Instituting change in the faculty reward system. New Directions for Higher Education, 81, 13-22.
22. Diamond, R. M. (1999). Aligning faculty rewards with institutional mission: Statements, policies, and guidelines. Bolton, MA: Anker.
23. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: J. Wiley.
24. Dooris, M. J., & Fairweather, J. S. (1992). The organization of academic research: Faculty behavior and perceptions. East Lansing, MI: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
25. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 109-123.
26. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Cantisano Terra, B. R. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
27. Evan, W. (1962). Role strain and the norm of reciprocity in research organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 68, 346-354.
28. Faia, M. (1980). Teaching, research and role theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 448, 36-45
29. Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
30. Fairweather, J. S. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 401-422.
31. Fisher, C., & Gitelson, R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the correlates of role conflict and ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 320-333.
32. Friedman, R. S., & Friedman, R.C. (1982). The role of organized research units in academic science. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
33. Fulton, O., & Trow, M. (1974). Research activity in American higher education. Sociology of Education, 47, 29-73.
34. Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Impacts of university research centers on graduate education. Paper prepared for the Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy.
35. Geiger, R. L. (1990). Organized researchers unite-their role in the development of university research. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 1-19.
36. Geisler, E. (1989). University-industry relations: A review of major issues. In A. N. Link & G. Tassey (Eds.), Cooperative research and development: The industry-university-government relationship (pp. 43-64). Boston: Kluwer.
37. Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 791-795.
38. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-491.
39. Hagstrom, W. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic.
40. Hampel, R. L. (1995). Overextended. Educational Researcher, 24, 29-30.
41. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress. New York: Wiley.
42. Kleinman, D. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2001). Science, capitalism, and the rise of the "knowledge worker": The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society, 30, 451-492.
43. Kernhauser, W. (1962). Scientists in industry: Conflict and accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Lin, Min-Wei, & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2, 269-290.
45. MacKinnon, N. (1978). Role strain: An assessment of a measure and its invariance of factor structure across studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 321-329.
46. Marcson, S. (1960). The scientist in American industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Marcson, S. (1966). Scientists in government. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
48. Merton, R. K. (1957a). On social structure and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
49. Merton, R. K. (1957b). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology, 8, 106-120.
50. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy, 32, 1081-1104.
51. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.
52. Porter, A. L., & Rossini, F. A. (1985). Peer review of interdisciplinary research proposals. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 10, 109-123.
53. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-133.
54. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Folleman, M. H., & Morgan, E. (2002). The "traffic" in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27, 282-313.
55. Smith, B. L. R., & Karlesky, J. (1977). The state of academic science. New York: Change Magazine Press.
56. Stahler, G. J., & Tash, W. R. (1994). Centers and institutes in the research university: issues, problems, and prospects. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 540-554.
57. Van Sell, M. T., Brief, A., & Schuler, R. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relations, 34, 43-71.