Review: Divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig

Animal

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1427-1439

  Gilbert, H ^a   Billon, Y ^b   Brossard, L ^c   Faure, J ^c   Gatellier, P ^d   Gondret, F ^c   Labussiere E ^c   Lebret, B ^c   Lefaucheur, L ^c   Le Floch, N ^c   Louveau, I ^c   Merlot, E ^c   Meunier Salaun M C ^c   Montagne, L ^c   Mormede, P ^a   Renaudeau, D ^c   Riquet, J ^a   Rogel Gaillard, C ^e   Van Milgen, J ^c   Vincent, A ^c   Noblet, J ^c   more..

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^d UR370 QuaPA   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

feed efficiency; genetics; pig; residual feed intake; selection

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BODY COMPOSITION; DIET; DIGESTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; LACTATION; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENT; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; RED MEAT; REPRODUCTION; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; DIET; DIGESTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; LACTATION; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PHENOTYPE; RED MEAT; REPRODUCTION; SWINE;

EID: 85010858397     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S175173111600286X     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arkfled EK, Young JM, Johnson RC, Fedler CA, Prusa K, Patience JF, Dekkers JCM, Gabler NK, Lonergan SM and Huff-Lonergan E 2015. Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high-or low-energy diets. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2530-2545.
2. Barea R, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Sellier P, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2062-2072.
3. Boddicker N, Gabler NK, Spurlock ME, Nettleton D and Dekkers JCM 2011. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on early production performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. Animal 5, 1344-1353.
4. Bunter KL, Cai W, Johnston DJ and Dekkers JC 2010. Selection to reduce residual feed intake in pigs produces a correlated response in juvenile insulin-like growth factor-I concentration. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1973-1981.
5. Cai W, Casey DS and Dekkers JCM 2008. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 86, 287-298.
6. Cai W, Kaiser MS and Dekkers JCM 2011. Genetic analysis of longitudinal measurements of performance traits in selection lines for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1270-1280.
7. Cai W, Kaiser MS and Dekkers JCM 2012. Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for residual feed intake on growth and feed intake curves in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 90, 127-141.
8. Campos PH, Noblet J, Jaguelin-Peyraud Y, Gilbert H, Mormede P, de Oliveira Donzele RF, Donzele JL and Renaudeau D 2014. Thermoregulatory responses during thermal acclimation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. International Journal Biometeorology 58, 1545-1557.
9. Colpoys JD, Abell CE, Young JM, Keating AF, Gabler NK, Millman ST, Siegford JM and Johnson AK 2014. Effects of genetic selection for residual feed intake on behavioral reactivity of castrated male pigs to novel stimuli tests. Applied Animal Behavior Science 159, 34-40.
10. Cruzen SM, Harris AJ, Hollinger K, Punt RM, Grubbs JK, Selsby JT, Dekkers JCM, Gabler NK, Lonergan SM and Huff-Lonergan E 2013. Evidence of decreased muscle protein turnover in gilts selected for low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4007-4016.
11. Faure J, Lefaucheur L, Bonhomme N, Ecolan P, Meteau K, Coustard SM, Kouba M, Gilbert H and Lebret B 2013. Consequences of divergent selection for residual feed intake in pigs on muscle energy metabolism and meat quality. Meat Science 93, 37-45.
12. Fontanesi L, Schiavo G, Galimberti G, Calò DG and Russo V 2014. A genome wide association study for average daily gain in Italian Large White pigs. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1385-1394.
13. Gilbert H, Alain S, Sellier P, Lagant H, Billon Y, Bidanel JP, Guillouet P, Noblet J, van Milgen J and Brossard L 2009. Relations génétiques entre efficacités alimentaire et cinétiques de croissance et d'ingestion chez le porc Large-White. Journeés de la Recherche Porcine 41, 1-6.
14. Gilbert H, Bidanel JP, Gruand J, Caritez JC, Billon Y, Guillouet P, Lagant H, Noblet J and Sellier P 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3182-3188.
15. Gilbert H, Bidanel JP, Billon Y, Lagant H, Guillouet P, Sellier P, J Noblet J and Hermesch S 2012. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1097-1108.
16. Gondret F, Louveau I, Mourot J, Duclos MJ, Lagarrigue S, Gilbert H and van Milgen J 2014. Dietary energy sources affect the partition of body lipids and the hierarchy of energy metabolic pathways in growing pigs differing in feed efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4865-4877.
17. Grubbs JK, Fritchen AN, Huff-Lonergan E, Dekkers JCM, Gabler NK and Lonergan SM 2013. Divergent genetic selection for residual feed intake impacts mitochondria reactive oxygen species production in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2133-2140.
18. Grubbs JK, Lonergan SM, Dekkers JCM and Tuggle CK 2014. Identification of potential serum biomarkers for feed efficiency in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 92 (E-suppl. 2), 187.
19. Harris AJ, Patience JF, Lonergan SM, Dekkers JMC and Gabler NK 2012. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 90, 164-166.
20. Herd RM and Arthur PF 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64-E71.
21. Hermesch S, Li L, Doeschl-Wilson A and Gilbert H 2015. Selection for productivity and robustness traits in pigs. Animal Production Science 55, 1437-1447.
22. Hoque MA, Katoh K and Suzuki K 2009. Genetic associations of residual feed intake with serum insulin-like growth factor-I and leptin concentrations, meat quality, and carcass cross sectional fat area ratios in Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3069-3075.
23. IFIP-GTE 2014. Gestion technico-économique des ateliers porcins (GTE): Évolution des résultats moyens nationaux-naisseurs-engraisseurs, edited by IFIP-Institut de la Filière porcine. Retrieved on 2 February 2016 from http://ifip. asso.fr/Pages Statics/resultat/pdf/retro/gte03.pdf.
24. Jégou M, Gondret F, Martin-Lalande J, Tea I, Baéza E and Louveau I 2015. NMR-based metabolomics highlights differences in plasma metabolites in pigs exhibiting diet-induced differences in adiposity. European Journal of Nutrition 55, 1189-1199.
25. Jégou M, Gondret F, Vincent A, Tréfeu C, Gilbert H and Louveau I 2016. Whole blood transcriptomics is relevant to identify molecular changes in response to genetic selection for feed efficiency and nutritional status in the pig. Plo S One 11, e0146550.
26. Knap PW 2009. Allocation of resources to maintenance. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 210-229. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
27. Labussière E, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Thibault JN, Le Floc'h N, Noblet J and van Milgen J 2015. Effect of inflammation stimulation on energy and nutrient utilization in piglets selected for low and high residual feed intake. Animal 9, 1653-1661.
28. Lefaucheur L, Lebret B, Ecolan P, Louveau I, Damon M, Prunier A, Billon Y, Sellier P and Gilbert H 2011. Muscle characteristics and meat quality traits are affected by divergent selection on residual feed intake in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 89, 996-1010.
29. Le Naou T, Le Floc'h N, Louveau I, Gilbert H and Gondret F 2012. Metabolic changes and tissue responses to selection on residual feed intake in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4771-4780.
30. Louveau I, Vincent A, Tacher S, Gilbert H and Gondret F 2016. Increased expressions of genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidation and antioxidant pathway in adipose tissue of pigs selected for a low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 94, 5042-5054.
31. Merlot E, Evrard J, Vincent A, Gilbert H and Le Floc'h N 2011. Effects of a divergent selection for residual feed intake on nutrient metabolism and immune response during an inflammatory challenge. In Oskar Kellner Symposium, 9-11 September 2011, Warnemunde, Germany, p. 89.
32. Merlot E, Gilbert H and Le Floc'h N 2016. Impact of selection on residual feed intake on the metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in young growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 94, 563-573.
33. Meunier-Salaün MC, Guérin C, Billon Y, Sellier P, Noblet J and Gilbert H 2014. Divergent selection for residual feed intake in group-housed growing pigs: Characteristics of physical and behavioural activity according to line and sex. Animal 8, 1898-1906.
34. Montagne L, Loisel F, Le Naou T, Gondret F, Gilbert H and Le Gall M 2014. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1512-1523.
35. Murphy TW, Mc Donald JM and Nielsen MK 2013. Hepatic mitochondrial efficiency in lines of mice differing in feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2077-2082.
36. Noblet J, Gilbert H, Jaguelin-Peyraud Y and Lebrun T 2013. Evidence of genetic variability for digestive efficiency in the growing pig fed a fibrous diet. Animal 7, 1259-1264.
37. Onteru SK, Gorbach DM, Young JM, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JCM and Rothschild MF 2013. Whole genome association studies of residual feed intake and related traits in the pig. PLo S One 8, e61756.
38. Prunier A, Heinonen M and Quesnel H 2010. High physiological demands in intensively raised pigs: Impact on health and welfare. Animal 4, 886-898.
39. Renaudeau D, Frances G, Dubois S, Gilbert H and Noblet J 2013. Effect of thermal heat stress on energy utilization in two lines of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1162-1175.
40. Renaudeau D, Gourdine JL, Fleury J, Ferchaud S, Billon Y, Noblet J and Gilbert H 2014. Selection for residual feed intake in growing pigs: Effects on sow performance in a tropical climate. Journal of Animal Science 92, 3568-3579.
41. Renaudeau D, Kerdoncuff M, Anaïs C and Gourdine JL 2008. Effect of temperature level on thermal acclimation in Large White growing pigs. Animal 11, 1619-1626.
42. Riquet J, Labrune Y, Feve K, Billon Y and Gilbert H 2014. Whole genome characterization and associations studies in two divergent pig lines selected on residual feed intake. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 17-22 August 2014, Vancouver, Canada, poster #571.
43. Rolf MM, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, Mc Kay SD, Mc Clure MC, Northcutt SL, Kerley MS and Weaber RL 2012. Genome-wide association analysis for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. Animal Genetics 43, 367-374.
44. Sadler LJ, Johnson AK, Lonergan SM, Nettleton D and Dekkers JCM 2011. The effect of selection for residual feed intake on general behavioural activity and the occurrence of lesions in Yorkshire gilts. Journal of Animal Science 89, 258-266.
45. Saintilan R, Brossard L, Vautier B, Sellier P, Bidanel J, van Milgen J and Gilbert H 2015. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig. Animal 9, 18-27.
46. Saintilan R, Mérour I, Brossard L, Tribout T, Dourmad JY, Sellier P, Bidanel J, van Milgen J and Gilbert H 2013. Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: Relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2542-2554.
47. Santana MH, Utsunomiya YT, Neves HH, Gomes RC, Garcia JF, Fukumasu H, Silva SL, Oliveira Junior GA, Alexandre PA, Leme PR, Brassaloti RA, Coutinho LL, Lopes TG, Meirelles FV, Eler JP and Ferraz JB 2014. Genome-wide association analysis of feed intake and residual feed intake in Nellore cattle. BMC Genetics 11, 15-21.
48. Shirali M, Doeschl-Wilson A, Duthie C, Knap PW, Kanis E, van Arendonk JAM and Roehe R 2014. Estimation of residual energy intake and its genetic background during the growing period in pigs. Livestock Science 168, 17-25.
49. Shirali M, Doeschl-Wilson A, Knap PW, Duthie C, Kanis E, van Arendonk JAM and Roehe R 2012. Nitrogen excretion at different stages of growth and its association with production traits in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1756-1765.
50. Smith RM, Gabler NK, Young JM, Cai W, Boddicker NJ, Anderson MJ, Huff-Lonergan E, Dekkers JCM and Lonergan SM 2011. Effects of selection for decreased residual feed intake on composition and quality of fresh pork. Journal of Animal Science 89, 192-200.
51. Swennen Q, Verhulst PJ, Collin A, Bordas A, Verbeke K, Vansant G, Decuypere E and Buyse J 2007. Further investigations on the role of diet-induced thermogenesis in the regulation of feed intake in chickens: Comparison of adult cockerels of lines selected for high or low residual feed intake. Poultry Science 86, 1960-1971.
52. Vincent A, Louveau I, Gondret F, Tréfeu C, Gilbert H and Lefaucheur L 2015. Divergent selection for residual feed intake affects the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of pig skeletal muscle. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2745-2758.
53. Young JM, Cai W and Dekkers JCM 2011. Effect of residual feed intake on feeding and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 89, 639-647.
54. Young JM and Dekkers JCM 2012. The genetic and biological basis of residual feed intake as a measure of feed efficiency. In Feed efficiency in swine (ed. JF Patience), pp 153-166. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
55. Zemb O, Achard C, Estellé J, Cauquil L, Denis C, Billon Y, Combes S, Rogel-Gaillard C and Gilbert H (submitted). Genetic selection for residual feed intake impacts porcine gut microbiota. Microbiome.