Evidence of genetic variability for digestive efficiency in the growing pig fed a fibrous diet

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1259-1264

  Noblet, J ^a,b   Gilbert, H ^c   Jaguelin Peyraud, Y ^a,b   Lebrun, T ^a,b  

^a PEGASE   (France)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

BW; dietary fibre; digestibility; genetic variability; growing pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; FECES; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SWINE;

ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; FECES; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84880205885     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113000463     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barea R, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Sellier P, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88 2062-2072.
2. Bastianelli D, Carré B, Mignon-Grasteau S, Bonnal L and Davrieux F 2007. Direct prediction of energy digestibility from poultry faeces using near infrared spectroscopy. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Near Infrared Spectroscopy 9-15 April 2005, Auckland, New Zealand (ed. GR Burling- Claridge, SE Holroyd and RMW Sumner), pp. 626-629. NZ NIRS Society Inc., Hamilton, New Zealand.
3. Bastianelli D, Bonnal L, Juin H, Mignon-Grasteau S, Davrieux F and Carré B 2010. Prediction of the chemical composition of poultry excreta by near infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 18, 69-77.
4. de Haer LCM and De Vries AG 1993. Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 36, 223-232.
5. Fé vrier C, Bourdon D and Aumaitre A 1992. Effects of level of dietary fiber from wheat bran on digestibility of nutrients, digestive enzymes and performance in the European Large White and Chinese Mei Shan pig. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 68, 60-72.
6. Kemp B, den Hartog LA, Klog JJ and Zandstra T 1991. The digestibility of nutrients, energy and nitrogen in the Meishan and Dutch landrace pig. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65, 263-266.
7. Kyriazakis I 2011. Opportunities to improve nutrient efficiency in pigs and poultry through breeding. Animal 5, 821-832.
8. Le Bellego L, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2002. Effect of high temperature and low protein diets on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 691-701.
9. Le Gall M, Warpechowski M, Jaguelin-Peyraud Yand Noblet J 2009. Influence of dietary fibre level and pelleting on digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Animal 3, 352-359.
10. Le Goff G and Noblet J 2001. Comparative digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418-2427.
11. Le Goff G, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2002a. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs, and adult sows. Animal Science 74, 503-515.
12. Le Goff G, Dubois S, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2002b. Influence of dietary fibre level on digestive and metabolic utilisation of energy in growing and finishing pigs. Animal Research 51, 245-259.
13. Len NT, Hong TTT, Ogle B and Lindberg JE 2009a. Comparison of total tract digestibility, development of visceral organs and digestive tract of Mong Cai and Yorkshire3Landrace piglets fed diets with different fibre sources. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 93, 181-191.
14. Len NT, Ngoc TB, Ogle B and Lindberg JE 2009b. Ileal and total tract digestibility in local (Mong Cai) and exotic (Landrace3Yorkshire) piglets fed low and highfibre diets, with or without enzyme supplementation. Livestock Science 126, 73-79.
15. Mignon-Grasteau S, Muley N, Bastianelli D, Gomez J, Sellier N, Millet N, Besnard J, Hallouis JM and Carré B 2004. Wheat based regimen digestibility is highly heritable in growing chickens. Poultry Science 83, 860-867.
16. Morel PCH, Lee TS and Moughan PJ 2006. Effect of feeding level, live weight and genotype on the apparent faecal digestibility of energy and organic matter in the growing pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 63-74.
17. Noblet J 2006. Recent advances in energy evaluation of feeds for pigs. In Recent advances in animal nutrition 2005 (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 1-26. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
18. Noblet J and van Milgen J 2004. Energy value of pig feeds: effect of pig body weight and energy evaluation system. Journal of Animal Science 82E. Suppl. E229-E238.
19. Noblet J, Shi XS and Dubois S 1994. Effect of body weight on net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 648-657.
20. Rougiè re N, Gomez J, Mignon-Grasteau S and Carré B 2009. Effects of diet particle size on digestive parameters in D1 and D2 genetic chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Poultry Science 88, 1206-1215.
21. SAS Institute 2008. Statistical analysis system release 8.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
22. Sundstö l F, Standal N and Vangen O 1979. Energy metabolism in lines of pigs selected for thickness of backfat and rate of gain. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 29 337-345.
23. Wenk C and Morel P 1985. Genetic variation of the digestibility of energy in growing pigs. In Digestive physiology in the pig. Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig (ed. A Just, H Jorgensen and JA Fernandez), pp. 396-399. National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen.
24. Yen JT, Tess MW, Pond WG and Dickerson GE 1983. Digestibility and metabolism of dietary nitrogen and energy in contemporary, genetically lean and obese pigs as estimated by total faecal collection and acid insoluble ash. Journal of Animal Science 56, 426-430.