Effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on early production performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake

Animal

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1344-1353

  Boddicker, N ^a   Gabler, N K ^a   Spurlock, M E ^a   Nettleton, D ^b   Dekkers, J C M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

carcass composition; feed efficiency; growth; residual feed intake; swine

Indexed keywords

BOS; SUIDAE;

EID: 80053121147     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S175173111100036X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.
2. Barea R, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Sellier P, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2062-2072.
3. Boddicker N, Gabler NK, Spurlock ME, Nettleton D and Dekkers JCM 2011. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 89, 40-51.
4. Brooks CC, Fontenot JP, Vipperman PE Jr, Thomas HR and Graham PP 1964. Chemical composition of the young pig carcass. Journal of Animal Science 23, 1022-1026.
5. Bunter KL, Cai W, Johnston DJ and Dekkers JCM 2010. Selection to reduce residual feed intake in pigs produces a correlated response in juvenile insulinlike growth factor-I concentration. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1973-1981.
6. Cai W, Casey DS and Dekkers JC 2008. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 86, 287-298. (Pubitemid 351229750)
7. Cai W, Wu H and Dekkers JCM 2010. Longitudinal analysis of body weight and feed intake in selection lines for residual feed intake in pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24, 17-27.
8. de Haer LCM and de Vries AG 1993. Feed intake patterns of and feed digestibility in growing pigs housed individually or in groups. Livestock Production Science 33, 277-292.
9. Gilbert H, Bidanel JP, Gruand J, Caritez JC, Billon Y, Guillouet P, Lagant H, Noblet J and Sellier P 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3182-3188. (Pubitemid 350247369)
10. Herd RM and Bishop SC 2000. Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. Livestock Production Science 63, 111-119. (Pubitemid 30231201)
11. Herd RM and Arthur PF 2008. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64-E71.
12. Hoque MA, Kadowaki H, Shibata T, Oikawa T and Suzuki K 2009. Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livestock Science 121, 45-49.
13. Johnson ZB, Chewning JJ and Nugent RA 3rd 1999. Genetic parameters for production traits and measures of residual feed intake in large white swine. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1679-1685. (Pubitemid 129552281)
14. Kennedy BW, van der Werf JH and Meuwissen TH 1993. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3239-3250.
15. Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D and Gregory KE 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 22, 486-494.
16. Luiting P 1990. Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying hens: Causes of variation in residual feed consumption. World's Poultry Science Journal 46, 133-152.
17. McDonald JM, Ramsey JJ, Miner JL and Nielsen MK 2009. Differences in mitochondrial efficiency between lines of mice divergently selected for heat loss. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3105-3113.
18. Moeller SJ and Christian LL 1998. Evaluation of the accuracy of real-time ultrasonic measurements of backfat and loin muscle area in swine using multiple statistical analysis procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2503-2514. (Pubitemid 128439569)
19. National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
20. Nguyen NH, McPhee CP and Wade CM 2005. Responses in residual feed intake in lines of Large White pigs selected for growth rate on restricted feeding (measured on ad libitum individual feeding). Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 264-270. (Pubitemid 41039336)
21. Noblet J, Karege C, Dubois S and van Milgen J 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: Effects of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1208-1216. (Pubitemid 129552260)
22. Oresanya TF, Beaulieu AD and Patience JF 2008. Investigations of energy metabolism in weanling barrows: The interaction of dietary energy concentration and daily feed (energy) intake. Journal of Animal Science 86, 348-363. (Pubitemid 351229756)
23. Richardson EC and Herd RM 2004. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 431-440. (Pubitemid 38847651)
24. Richardson EC, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Thompson JM, Archer JA and Arthur PF 2001. Body composition and implications for heat production of Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 1065-1072. (Pubitemid 33030576)
25. SAS Institute 2007. SAS online documentation, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.