Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behavior and daily feed intake patterns in yorkshire swine

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 639-647

  Young, J M ^a   Cai, W ^a   Dekkers, J C M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feeding behavior; Residual feed intake; Swine

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; SELECTION, GENETIC; SWINE;

EID: 79959525266     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-2892     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alexander, L. S., A. Qu, S. A. Cutler, A. Mahajan, M. F. Rothschild, W. Cai, J. C. Dekkers, and C. H. Stahl. 2010. A calcitonin receptor (CALCR) single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with growth performance and bone integrity in response to dietary phosphorous deficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 88:1009-1016.
2. Braastad, B. O., and J. Katle. 1989. Behavioral differences between laying hen populations selected for high and low efficiency of food utilization. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:533-544.
3. Bunter, K. L., W. Cai, D. J. Johnston, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2010. Selection to reduce residual feed intake in pigs produces a correlated response in juvenile insulin-like growth factor-I concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 88:1973-1981.
4. Cai, W., D. S. Casey, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2008. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. J. Anim. Sci. 86:287-298.
5. Casey, D. S., H. S. Stern, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2005. Identification of errors and factors associated with errors in data from electronic swine feeders. J. Anim. Sci. 83:969-982.
6. de Haer, L. C. M., P. Luiting, and A. G. de Vries. 1993. Relations among individual (residual) feed intake, growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs in group housing. Livest. Prod. Sci. 36:233-253.
7. Golden, J. W., M. S. Kerley, and W. H. Kolath. 2008. The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets. J. Anim. Sci. 86:180-186.
8. Labroue, F., R. Gueblez, and P. Sellier. 1997. Genetic parameters of feeding behaviour and performance traits in group-housed Large White and French Landrace growing pigs. Genet. Sel. Evol. 29:451-468.
9. Lancaster, P. A., G. E. Carstens, F. R. B. Ribeiro, L. O. Tedeschi, and D. H. Crews Jr. 2009. Characterization of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behavior and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1528-1539.
10. McGlone, J. J., and W. Pond. 2003. Pig Production: Biological Principles and Applications. Delmar Learning, Clifton Park, NY.
11. Nkrumah, J. D., D. H. Crews Jr., J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, Z. Wang, C. Li, and S. S. Moore. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2382-2390.
12. Nkrumah, J. D., E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison, K. Schmid, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, Z. Wang, and S. S. Moore. 2006. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:145-153.
13. Rauw, W. M., J. Soler, J. Tibau, J. Reixach, and L. Gomez Raya. 2006a. The relationship between residual feed intake and feed intake behavior in group-housed Duroc barrows. J. Anim. Sci. 84:956-962.
14. Rauw, W. M., J. Soler, J. Tibau, J. Reixach, and L. Gomez Raya. 2006b. Feeding time and feeding rate and its relationship with feed intake, feed efficiency, growth rate, and rate of fat deposition in growing Duroc barrows. J. Anim. Sci. 84:3404-3409.
15. Von Felde, A., R. Roehe, H. Looft, and E. Kalm. 1996. Genetic association between feed intake and feed intake behaviour at different stages of growth of group-housed boars. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47:11-22.