Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 383-408

  Kay, Robin H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Preservice computer technology education review strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008812541     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Albee, J. J. (2003). A study of preservice elementary teachers’ technology skill preparedness and examples of how it can be increased. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 53-71.
2. Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321-347.
3. Albion, P. R. (2003). PBL + IMM =PBL2: Problem based learning and interactive multimedia development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 243-257.
4. Albion, P. R., & Gibson, I. W. (2000). Problem-based learning as a multi-media design framework in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 315-316.
5. Aust, R., Newberry, B., O’Brien, J., & Thomas, J. (2005). Learning generation: fostering innovation with tomorrow’s teachers and technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 167-195.
6. Baker, E. L., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1994). Evaluating the Apple classrooms of tomorrow. In E.L. Baker & H. E O’Neile, Jr. (Eds.). Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 173-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Balli, S. J., Wright, M. D., & Foster, P. N. (1997). Preservice teachers’ field experiences with technology. Education Technology, 37(5), 40-46.
8. Bartlett, A. (2002). Preparing preservice teachers to implement performance assessment and technology through electronic portfolios. Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 90-97.
9. Basham, J., Palla, A., & Pianfetti, E. (2005). An integrated framework used to increase preservice teacher nets-t ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 251-216.
10. Becker, H. J. & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356-384.
11. Bennett, L. (2000-2001). Technology standards for the preparation of teachers. International Journal of Social Education, 15(2), 1-11.
12. Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. A. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105-127.
13. Blocher, J. M., Echols, J., de Montes, L. S., Willis, E., & Tucker, G. (2003). Shifting from instruction to construction: A personal meaningful experience. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 474-478.
14. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K, Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M., et al. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(1), 57-73.
15. Bucci, T. T. (2003). The technology teaching lab: Meeting the ISTE challenge. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 1-9.
16. Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as the attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.
17. Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T., Maclean, A., et al. (2003). Knowledge management support for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 42-64.
18. CEO Forum on Education and Technology (2000). Teacher preparation StaR chart: A self-assessment tool for colleges of education—Preparing a new generation of teachers. Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://www.ceoforum.org/down-loads/tpreport.pdf.
19. Cherup, S., & Snyder, L. (2003). A model for integrating technology into teacher education: One college’s journey. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 43-52.
20. Clift, R. T., Mullen, L., Levin, J., & Larson, A. (2001). Technologies in contexts: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 33-50.
21. Collier, S., Weinburgh, M. H., & Rivera, M. (2004). Infusing technology skills into a teacher education program: Change in students’ knowledge about the use c f technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 447-468.
22. Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2003). Enhancing technological practice: An assessment framework for technology education in New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(1), 1-26.
23. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303-329.
25. Dawson, K., & Norris, A. (2000). Preservice teachers' experiences in a K—12/university technology-based field initiative: benefits, facilitators, constraints, and implications for teacher educators. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(1), 4-12.
26. Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college’s walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 334-346.
27. Doering, A., Hughes, J. & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-361.
28. Doty, L., & Hillman, C. (2000). Training preservice teachers in technology: A portfolio approach. International Journal of Social Education, 15(1), 13-18.
29. Eifler, K., Greene, T., & Carroll, J. (2001). Walking the talk is tough: From a single technology course to infusion. The Educational Forum, 65(4), 366-375.
30. Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., & Wignall, E. (2003). Increasing preservice teachers’ capacity for technology integration through the use of electronic models. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95-112.
31. Evans, V. (1995). Blackout: Preventing racial discrimination on the net. Library journal, 120, 44-46.
32. Evans, B. P., & Gunter, G. A. (2004). A catalyst for change: Influencing preservice teacher technology proficiency. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 41(3), 325-336.
33. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
34. Flores, A., Knaup, J. E., Middleton, J. A., & Staley, F. A. (2002). Integration of technology, science, and mathematics in the middle grades: A teacher preparation program. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1).
35. Francis-Pelton, L., Farragher, P. & Riecken, T. (2000). Content based technology: Learning by modeling. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 8(3), 177-186.
36. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
37. Gibson, S. (2002). Incorporating computer-based learning into preservice education courses. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education On-line, 2(1), 97-118.
38. Gillingham, M. G., & Topper, A. (1999). Technology in teacher preparation: Preparing teachers for the future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 303-321.
39. Gimbert, B., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: from integration to actualization. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 204-217.
40. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
41. Gunter, G. A. (2001). Making a difference: Using emerging technologies and teaching strategies to restructure an undergraduate technology course for preservice teachers. Education Media International, 38(1), 13-20.
42. Halpin, R. (1999). A model for constructivist learning in practice: Computer literacy integrated into elementary mathematics and science teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 3-2(1), 128-138.
43. Hargrave, D., & Hsu, Y. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(4), 303-314.
44. Hattler, J. A. (1999). Technology for preservice teachers: ‘driver education’ for the information superhighway. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 323-332.
45. Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1998), Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, 280(April 17), 390-391.
46. Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: individualizing technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239-263.
47. ISTE/NCATE (2003). ISTE/NCATE Standards for educational technology programs. Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://cnets.iste.org/ncate/.
48. Johnson-Gentile, K., Lonberger, R., Parana, J., & West, A. (2000). Preparing preservice teachers for the technological classroom: A school-college partnership. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 97-109.
49. Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2004). Using anchored instruction to teach preservice teachers to integrate technology in the curriculum. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 431-445.
50. Kay, R. H. (1992). An analysis of methods used to examine gender differences in computer-related behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(3), 323-336.
51. Kay, R. H. (in press). Addressing gender differences in computer ability, attitudes and use: The laptop effect. Journal of Educational Computing Research.
52. Kay, R. K., & Knaack, L (2005). A case for ubiquitous, integrated computing in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 391-412.
53. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change. A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
54. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker, & H. F. O’Neile, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training, (pp. 9-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Krueger, K., Boboc, M., Smaldino, S., Cornish, Y., & Callahan, W. (2004). InTime impact report. What was InTime’s effectiveness and impact on faculty and preservice teachers? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 185-210.
56. Lohr, L., Javeri, M., Mahoney, C., Gall, J., Li, K., & Strongin, D. (2003). Using rapid application development to improve the usability of a preservice teacher technology course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 41-55.
57. Luan, W. S., Jalil, H. A., Ayub, A. F. M., Bakar, K. A., & Hong, T. S. (2003). Teaching a discrete information technology course in a constructivist learning environment: Is it effective for Malaysian preservice teachers? Internet and Higher Education, 6, 193-204.
58. Maeers, M., Browne, N., & Cooper, E. (2000). Pedagogically appropriate integration of informational technology in an elementary preservice teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 219-229.
59. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia’s Basic Skills/Computer Education program: An analysis of student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
60. Marra, R. (2004). An online course to help teachers “use technology to enhance learning”: Successes and limitations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 411-429.
61. McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 81-101.
62. Milbrath, Y. L., & Kinzie, M. B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373-396.
63. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. Available: http://www.mff.org/publications/publications.taf?page=154.
64. Mullen, L. (2001). Beyond infusion: Preservice student’s understandings about educational technologies for teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 447-466.
65. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2001. Retrieved August 20, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/tables/dt419.asp.
66. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2003). International Technology Education Association/Council on Technology Teacher Education (ITEA/CTTE). Retrieved July 27, 2004, from http://www.ncate.org/standard/programstds.htm.
67. Niess, M. L. (2001). A model for integrating technology in preservice science and mathematics content-specific teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 10(2), 102-109.
68. Nolan, P. (1992). Computers in education; Achieving equitable access and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3) 299-314.
69. O’Reilly, D. (2003). Making information and communications technology work. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(3), 417-446.
70. OTA (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (OTA-EHR- 616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/-ota/diskl/1995/9541/9541.PDE
71. Peters, J. M., O’Brien, G., Briscoe, C., & Korth, W. W. (1995). A long-term assessment of an integrated microcomputer component for preservice secondary science teachers. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14(4), 499-520.
72. Pierson, M. E., & McNeil, S. (2000). Preservice technology integration through collaborative action communities. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 189-199
73. Plante, J. & Beattie, D. (2004). Education, skills, and learning—Research papers: Connectivity and ICT integration in Canadian elementary and secondary schools: First results from the Information and Communications Technohgies in Schools Survey, 2003—2004. Statistics Canada. Retrieved August 29, 2004, from http://www.schoolnet.ca/home/documents/Report_EN.pdf.
74. Pope, M., Hare, P., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203.
75. Robertson, H. (2003). Toward a theory of negativity: Teacher education and information and communications technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 280-296.
76. Rowley, J., Dysard, G., & Arnold, J. (2005). Developing a new technology infusion program for preparing tomorrow’s teachers. Journal ofTechnology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 105-123.
77. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
78. Sahin, T. Y. (2003). Student teachers’ perceptions of instructional technology: Developing materials based on a constructivist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 67-74.
79. Sanders, J. (in press). Gender and technology: A research review. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Handbook of gender and education. London: Sage.
80. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. InT. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCI: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NT: Erlbaum.
81. Seels, B., Campbell, S., & Talsma, V. (2003). Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 91-104.
82. Shashaani, L. (1994). Socioeconomic status, parents’ sex-role stereotypes, and the gender gap in computing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 433-451.
83. Shoffner, M. B., Dias, L. B., & Thomas, C. D. (2001). A model for collaborative relationships between instructional technology and teacher education programs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(3), 395-411.
84. SIIA. (2000). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
85. Simpson, M., Payne, F., Munro, R., & Hughes, S. (1999). Using information and communications technology as a pedagogical tool: Who educates the educators? Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(3), 247-262.
86. Simpson, M., Payne, F., Munro, R., & Lynch, E. (1998). Using information and communications technology as a pedagogical tool: A survey on initial teacher education in Scotland. Jouranl of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7(3), 431-446.
87. Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in school, 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Software Publisher’s Association.
88. Smith, S. J., & Robinson, S. (2003). Technology integration through collaborative cohorts: Preparing future teachers to use technology. Remedial and Special Education, 24(3), 154-160.
89. Snider, S. L. (2003). Exploring technology integration in a field-based teacher education program: Implementation efforts and findings. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 230-249.
90. Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science applications (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Stuhlmann, J. M., & Taylor, H. G. (1999). Preparing technically competent student teachers: A three year study of interventions and experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 333-350.
92. Strudler, N., & Wetzel, L. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63-81.
93. Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D., & Weiss, R. (2003). Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Educational Technology Research and Development, 5/(1), 39-54.
94. Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003). Technology collaboratives for simultaneous renewal in teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 73-89.
95. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). E-Learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children [Report]. Washington, DC. Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/reports/e-learning.pdf.
96. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2002. Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/tables/dt4l9.asp.
97. Vannatta, R. A., & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 132-148.
98. Vrasida, C., & Mclsaac, M. S. (2001). Integrating technology into teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 2-3, 127-132.
99. Wang, Y. (2002). From teacher-centredness to student-centredness: Are preservice teachers making the conceptual shift when teaching in information age classrooms? Educational Media International, 39(3-4), 257-265.
100. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250.
101. Wang, Y., & Holthaus, P. (1999). Facing the world: Student teachers’ computer use during practicum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 207-223.
102. Waxman, FI. C., Connell, M. L., & Gray, J. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Laboratory.
103. Wenglinsky, FI. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
104. Wepner, S. B., Ziomek, N., & Tao L. (2003). Three teacher educators’ perspectives about the shifting responsibilities of infusing technology into the curriculum. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 53-63.
105. Whetstone, L., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2001). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology: Survey results. TechTrends, 45(4), 11-19.
106. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.
107. Willis, E. M., & Sujo de Montes, L. (2002). Does requiring a technology course in preservice teacher education affect student teacher’s technology use in the classroom? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(3), 76-80.
108. Wilkerson, T. L. (2003). A trial model for preparing preservice teachers for the integration of technology in teaching and learning. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 27-32.
109. Wilkinson, L., Buboltz, W., Cook, J., Matthew, K., & Thomas, D. (2000). Minorities and mainstream culture: Does a technology gap exist? In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2000 (pp. 2514-2519). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
110. Wright, V. H., Wilson, E. K., Gordon, W., & Stallworth, J. B. (2002). Master technology teacher: A partnership between preservice and inservice teachers and teacher educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(3), 353-362.
111. Yildirm, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479-495.