The influence of computer and internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 356-384

  Becker, Henry J ^a   Ravitz, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010508366     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782260     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Becker, H. J. (1994). Analysis and trends of school use of new information technologies. Report for the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. Irvine: Department of Education, University of California, Irvine. Available: Www.gse.uci.edu/EdTech Use/c-tblcnt.htm
2. Becker, H.J. (1995). National School Network testbed phase 2: Baseline survey of testbed-participating schools. Contractor report. Available: Http://copernicus.bbn.com/testbed2/TBdocs/surveys/Baseline_report_8_31.html
3. Becker, H.J., & Ravitz, J. L (1997, August). The equity threat of promising innovations: The Internet in schools. Paper presented at the 1997 SPSSI Conference of the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago. Available: Http:/I nsn.bbn.com/dissemination/docs/equity.html
4. Brooks, J. G.,& Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for
5. constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
6. Brown, J. S., Collins A., & Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42
7. Cuban, L (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms; 1890-1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press
8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company
9. Fishman, B., & Pea, R. (1994). The internetworked school: A policy for the future. Technos: Quarterly of Education and Technology, 3(1), 22-26
10. Honey, M., & Moeller, B. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings. CTE Technical Report Issue No. 6.New York: Center for Children and Technology
11. Hunter, B. (1993). Internetworking: Coordinating technology for systemic reform. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 42-46
12. Hunter, B. (1997, November). Fostering collaborative knowledge-building: Lessons learned from the National School Network testbed. In B. Collis & G
13. Knezek (Eds.), Teaching & learning in the digital age-Research into practice with telecommunications in education settings. Tel+ Ed ‘97 Proceedings [CD-ROM]. Available: Http://ns-n.bbn.com/dissemination/docs/Hunter_TelEd97.html
14. Jonassen, D., Carr, C., & Hsui-Ping, Y. (1998). Computers as Mind Tools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24-32
15. Jones, B., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. N. (1994).Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
16. Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. InT. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp.1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology’s role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement
18. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas. Boston, MA: Beacon Press
19. Pea, R. (1996). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. InT. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp.171-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
20. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press
21. President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology Panel on Educational Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K -12 Education in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
22. Reigeluth, C. (1994). The imperative for systemic change. In C. Reigeluth & R. Garfinkle (Eds.). Systerr;.ic change in education (pp. 35-41). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
23. Riel, M. (1989). Four models of educational telecommunications: Connections to the future. Education & Computing, 5, 261-274
24. Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed-). New York: Free Press
25. Romiszowski, A., & Ravitz, J. (1997). Computer mediated communications. In A. Romiszowski & C. Dills (Eds.), Instructional development: State of the art (pp. 745-768). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
26. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press