Benefits and drawbacks of computer-based assessment and feedback systems: Student and educator perspectives

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 294-301

  Debuse, Justin C W ^a   Lawley, Meredith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK CONTROL;

COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENTS; COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEMS; GROUP ASSIGNMENTS; HIGH QUALITY; PERSONALISATION; POST-GRADUATE LEVELS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84956581361     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12232     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baillie-de Byl, P., (2004). An online assistant for remote, distributed critiquing of electronically submitted assessment. Educational Technology and Society, 7, 1, 29-41.
2. Björkman, M., (1972). Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: notes on a neglected issue. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 1, 152-158.
3. Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., &, Shields, S., (2013). What feedback do students want? Politics, 33, 66-79.
4. Blayney, P., &, Freeman, M., (2004). Automated formative feedback and summative assessment using individualised spreadsheet assignments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 2, 203-231.
5. Cargill, M., (2001). Enhancing essay feed-back using "MindTrail" software: exactly what makes the difference in student development? Paper presented at the Changing Identities: language and academic skills conference, the University of Wollongong, Australia.
6. Chen, Y. T., Chou, Y. H., &, Cowan, J., (2014). Concentrating on affective feedforward in online tutoring. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 4, 694-706.
7. Debuse, J., Lawley, M., &, Shibl, R., (2008). Educators' perceptions of automated feedback systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 4, 374-386.
8. Debuse, J. C. W., &, Lawley, M., (2011). Using innovative technology to develop sustainable assessment practices in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 2, 160-170.
9. Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., &, Rowe, P., (2008). Students' response to traditional and computer assisted formative feedback: a comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 3, 486-500.
10. Freney, M., &, Wood, D., (2006). CAFAS: an automated computer aided assessment tool for providing student feedback and managing assessment information. Paper presented at the Enhancing Student Learning: 2006 Evaluations and Assessment Conference.
11. Freney, M., &, Wood, D., (2008). The delivery and management of feedback and assessment in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Learning, 15, 2, 169-178.
12. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., &, Skelton, A., (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 1, 53-64.
13. Kelley, A. C., (1968). An experiment with TIPS: a computer-aided instructional system for undergraduate education. The American Economic Review, 58, 2, 446-457.
14. Lumsden, K., &, Scott, A., (1988). A characteristics approach to the evaluation of economics software packages. Journal of Economic Education, 19, 4, 353-362.
15. Milne, J., Heinrich, E., &, Morrison, D., (2008). Technological support for assignment assessment: a New Zealand higher education survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 5, 487-504.
16. Stringer, E. T., (2007). Action Research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
17. Stevens, K., &, Jamieson, R., (2002). The introduction and assessment of three teaching tools (WebCT, MindTrail, EVE) into a post graduate course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1, 4, 233-252.
18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., &, Davis, F., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.