Mathematics—a Critical Filter for STEM-Related Career Choices? A Longitudinal Examination among Australian and U.S. Adolescents

Sex Roles

Volumn 77, Issue 3-4, 2017, Pages 254-271

  Watt, Helen M G ^a   Hyde, Janet S ^b   Petersen, Jennifer ^c   Morris, Zoe A ^a   Rozek, Christopher S ^d   Harackiewicz, Judith M ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Career choice; Critical filter; Expectancy value theory; Gender; High school; Mathematics; STEM

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002412659     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0711-1     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modelling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2014). UCube higher education data. Retrieved from http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
4. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. PNAS, 108, 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.
5. Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976. doi:10.1086/595942.
6. Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(49), 2–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049.
7. Chhin, C. S., Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2008). Gender-typed occupational choices: The long-term impact of parents’ beliefs and expectations. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes (pp. 215–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 300–315. doi:10.1037/a0033805.
9. Crombie, G., Sinclair, N., Silverthorn, N., Byrne, B. M., DuBois, D. L., & Trinneer, A. (2005). Predictors of young adolescents’ math grades and course enrollment intentions: Gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 52, 351–367. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-2678-1.
10. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294.
11. Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnson, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199.
12. Dobson, I. R. (2012). Unhealthy science? University natural and physical sciences 2002 to 2009/10. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Unhealthy-Science-Report-Ian-R-Dobson.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
13. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford.
14. Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368.
15. Eccles, J. S. (2013). Gender and STEM: Opting in versus dropping out. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 2–3. Retrieved from http://www.vhto.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/publicaties/Gender_and_STEM_Opting_in_versus_dropping_out.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
16. Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. (2003, April). Predicting mathematics-related career aspirations and choices. Paper presented at the Society for Research in child development (SRCD) biennial conference, Tampa, FL.
17. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003.
18. Eccles, (. P.). J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
19. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x.
20. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., Harold, R. D., Yoon, K. S., Abreton, A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1993a). Parents and gender-role socialization during the middle childhood and adolescent years. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, 6 (pp. 59–83). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993b). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x.
22. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053.
23. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., & Rotella, S. C. (1999). Antecedent factors differentiating women and men in science/nonscience careers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 763–780. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00396.x.
24. Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 435–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.435.
25. Goodnow, J. J. (1988). Parents’ ideas, actions, and feelings: Models and methods from developmental and social psychology. Child Development, 59, 286–320. doi:10.2307/1130312.
26. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316.
27. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562.
28. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105.
29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents motivate their adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test. Psychological Science, 23, 899–906. doi:10.1177/0956797611435530.
30. Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016a). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 745–765. doi:10.1037/pspp0000075.
31. Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016b). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 220–227. doi:10.1177/2372732216655542.
32. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. doi:10.3102/00346543060004549.
33. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the twenty-first century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179. doi:10.3102/00346543070002151.
34. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
35. Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067.
36. Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.
37. Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. doi:10.1037/a0019506.
38. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
39. Hyde, J. S., Klein, M. H., Essex, M. J., & Clark, R. (1995). Maternity leave and women's mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 257–285. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00291.x.
40. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.
41. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932–944. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.932.
43. Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2013). Mathematics interest and achievement: What role do perceived parent and teacher support play? A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 207–231. Retrieved fromhttp://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/viewFile/301/526. Accessed 26 August 2016.
44. Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 268–282. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z.
45. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1123–1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276.
46. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.
47. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
48. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441.
49. Meece, J. L., Eccles, (. P.). J., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. B., & Putterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324–348. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.324.
50. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60.
51. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825.
52. Miller, C. C. (2011, July 13). Girl power wins at Google’s first science fair. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/science/19google.html. Accessed 26 August 2016.
53. Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330, 1234–1237. doi:10.1126/science.1195996.
54. National Center for O*NET Development. (2011). O*NET products at work. Retrieved from https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/paw/Products_at_Work.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
55. National Science Foundation. (2016). Doctorate recipients by sex and subfield. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16300/data-tables.cfm. Accessed 26 August 2016.
56. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2013). Snapshot report – degree attainment. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-degreeattainment3/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
57. Osipow, S. H., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Theories of career development (4th ed). London: Allyn & Bacon.
58. Pomerantz, E. M., & Dong, W. (2006). Effects of mothers’ perceptions of children’s competence: The moderating role of mothers’ theories of competence. Developmental Psychology, 42, 950–961. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.950.
59. Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race-ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39, 656–664. doi:10.3102/0013189X10391657.
60. Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 652–664. doi:10.1111/jora.12013.
61. Sells, L. W. (1980). Mathematics: The invisible filter. Engineering Education, 70, 340–341.
62. Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Keating, D. P. (2006). Trajectories of career aspirations through adolescence and young adulthood: Early math achievement as a critical filter. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 347–358. doi:10.1080/13803610600765752.
63. Shih, M. J., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ho, G. C. (2012). Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141–156). New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Sorby, S., Casey, B. M., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.010.
65. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.
66. Steffens, J. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947–963. doi:10.1037/a0019920.
67. STEPS. (2016). STEPS: Study of Transitions and Educational Pathways. Retrieved from http://www.stepsstudy.org/. Accessed 26 August 2016.
68. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. doi:10.1037/a0017364.
69. U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (1998). O*NET: The occupational information network. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
70. United States Census Bureau. (2006). State and county quickfacts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/55000.html. Accessed 26 August 2016.
71. Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239–259. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90016-3.
72. Wai, J., Lubinksy, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127.
73. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2.
74. Watt, H. M. G. (2002). Gendered achievement-related choices and behaviours in mathematics and English: The nature and influence of self-, task- and value perceptions (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
75. Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x.
76. Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 305–322. doi:10.1080/13803610600765562.
77. Watt, H. M. G. (2008). What motivates females and males to pursue sex-stereotyped careers? In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 87–113). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11706-003.
78. Watt, H. M. G. (2016). Gender and motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 320–339). New York: Routledge.
79. Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: A motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the USA. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 642–659. doi:10.1108/02610150610719119.
80. Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1594–1611. doi:10.1037/a0027838.
81. Wigfield, A. (1993). Why should I learn this? Adolescents’ achievement values for different activities. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 8, pp. 99–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. doi:10.1007/BF02209024.
83. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.