Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 817-835

  Wai, Jonathan ^a   Lubinski, David ^a   Benbow, Camilla P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

constructive replication; longitudinal study; spatial ability; STEM; talent searches

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349222511     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016127     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Achter J.A., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P., and Eftekhari-Sanjani H. Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (1999) 777-786
2. Ackerman P.L. A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence 22 (1996) 227-257
3. Ackerman P.L., and Heggestad E.D. Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997) 218-245
4. Alexander G.M., and Son T. Androgens and eye movements in women and men during a test of mental rotation ability. Hormones and Behavior 52 (2007) 197-204
5. American Competitiveness Initiative. American Competitiveness Initiative: Leading the world in innovation (2006), Domestic Policy Council Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC
6. Benbow C.P., and Stanley J.C. Inequity in equity: How "equity" can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2 (1996) 249-292
7. Bergemann N., Parzer P., Kaiser D., Maier-Braunleder S., Mundt C., and Klier C. Testosterone and gonadotropins but not estrogen associated with spatial ability in women suffering from schizophrenia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33 (2008) 507-516
8. Bingham W.V. Aptitudes and aptitude testing (1937), Harper, New York
9. Carroll J.B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
10. Chabris C.F., and Glickman M.E. Sex differences in intellectual performance: Analysis of a large cohort of competitive chess players. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 1009-1107
11. Colangelo N., Assouline S.G., and Gross M.U.M. A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (2004), University of Iowa, Iowa City
12. Corno L., Cronbach L.J., Kupermintz H., Lohman D.F., Mandinach D., Porteus A.W., et al. Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow (2002), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
13. Cronbach L.J. Two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 12 (1957) 671-684
14. Cronbach L.J. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 30 (1975) 116-127
15. Dawes R.M. Graduate admission variables and future success. Science 187 (1975, February 28) 721-723
16. Dawes R.M. House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on a myth (1994), Free Press, New York
17. Dawis R.V. The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 39 (1992) 7-19
18. Dawis R.V., and Lofquist L.H. A psychological theory of work adjustment (1984), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
19. Dunnette M.D. Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology. American Psychologist 21 (1966) 343-352
20. Ehrlich S.B., Levine S.C., and Goldin-Meadow S. The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology 42 (2006) 1259-1268
21. Eliot J.C. Models of psychological space: Psychometric, developmental, and experimental approaches (1987), Springer-Verlag, New York
22. Eliot J.C., and Smith I.M. An international dictionary of spatial tests (1983), NFER-Nelson, Windsor, England
23. Flanagan J.C., Dailey J.T., Shaycoft M.F., Gorman W.A., Orr D.B., and Goldberg I. Design for a study of American youth (1962), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
24. Friedman T.L. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century (2005), Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York
25. Geary D.C. Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (1998), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
26. Geary D.C. The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence (2005), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
27. Gohm C.L., Humphreys L.G., and Yao G. Underachievement among spatially gifted students. American Educational Research Journal 35 (1998) 515-531
28. Gottfredson L.S. The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment 11 (2003) 115-135
29. Gottfredson L.S. Using Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In: Brown S.D., and Lent R.W. (Eds). Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2005), Wiley, New York 71-100
30. Hackman D.A., and Farah M.J. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (2009) 65-73
31. Hegarty M., and Waller D.A. Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah P., and Miyake A. (Eds). The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 121-169
32. Humphreys L.G. Some unconventional analyses of resemblance coefficients for male and female monozygotic and dizygotic twins. In: Cicchette D., and Grove W. (Eds). Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (1991), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 158-187
33. Humphreys L.G., and Lubinski D. Brief history and psychological significance of assessing spatial visualization. In: Benbow C.P., and Lubinski D. (Eds). Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (1996), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 116-140
34. Humphreys L.G., Lubinski D., and Yao G. Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993) 250-261
35. Johnson W., and Bouchard T.J. Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie. Intelligence 35 (2007) 23-39
36. Johnson W., and Bouchard T.J. Sex differences in mental ability: A proposed means to link them to brain structure and function. Intelligence 35 (2007) 197-209
37. Keating D.P., and Stanley J.S. Extreme measures for the mathematically gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher 1 (1972) 3-7
38. Levine S.C., Vasilyeva M., Lourenco S.F., Newcombe N.S., and Huttenlocher J. Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 841-845
39. Lohman D.F. Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In: Sternberg R.J. (Ed). Advances in the psychology of human intelligence 4 (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 181-248
40. Lohman D.F. Spatial ability. In: Sternberg R.J. (Ed). Encyclopedia of intelligence 2 (1994), Macmillan, New York 1000-1007
41. Lohman D.F. Spatially gifted, verbally inconvenienced. In: Colangelo N., Assouline S.G., and Ambroson D.L. (Eds). Talent development: Vol. 2. Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (1994), Ohio Psychology Press, Dayton, OH 251-264
42. Lohman D.F. Spatial ability and G. In: Dennis I., and Tapsfield P. (Eds). Human abilities: Their nature and assessment (1996), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 97-116
43. Lohman D.F. The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly 49 (2005) 111-138
44. Lubinski D. Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "Sinking shafts at a few critical points.". Annual Review of Psychology 51 (2000) 405-444
45. Lubinski D. Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904). "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004) 96-111
46. Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. States of excellence. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 137-150
47. Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2006) 316-345
48. Lubinski D., and Dawis R.V. Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In: Dunnette M.D., and Hough L.M. (Eds). The handbook of industrial/organizational psychology. 2nd ed. (1992), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 1-59
49. Lubinski D., and Humphreys L.G. A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence 14 (1990) 327-355
50. Lubinski D., and Humphreys L.G. Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial visualization and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 385-393
51. Lubinski D., and Humphreys L.G. Seeing the forest from the trees: When predicting the behavior or status of groups, correlate means. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2 (1996) 363-376
52. Lubinski D., and Humphreys L.G. Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences. Intelligence 24 (1997) 159-201
53. Lykken D.T. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 70 (1968) 151-159
54. Lykken D.T. What's wrong with psychology anyway?. In: Ciccetti D., and Grove W. (Eds). Thinking clearly about psychology (1991), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 3-39
55. Meehl P.E. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46 (1978) 806-834
56. Meehl P.E. Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry 1 (1990) 108-141
57. National Academy of Sciences. Rising above the gathering storm (2005), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
58. Newcombe N.S., and Uttal D.H. Whorf versus Socrates, round 10. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 394-396
59. Noble K.G., McCandliss B.D., and Farah M.J. Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Developmental Science 10 (2007) 464-480
60. Park G., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Contrasting intellectual patterns for creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 948-952
61. Park G., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 957-961
62. Paterson D.G. The conservation of human talent. American Psychologist 12 (1957) 134-144
63. Paterson D.G., Elliott R.M., Anderson L.D., and Toops H.A. Minnesota Mechanical Ability Tests (1930), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
64. Penner A.M., and Paret M. Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research 37 (2008) 239-253
65. Sackett P.R., and Yang H. Correction for range restriction: An expanded typology. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000) 112-118
66. Schmidt D.B., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Validity of assessing educational-vocational preference dimensions among intellectually talented 13-year-olds. Journal of Counseling Psychology 45 (1998) 436-453
67. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 262-274
68. Shaycoft M.F. The high school years: Growth in cognitive skills (1967), School of Education, University of Pittsburgh, American Institutes for Research, Pittsburgh, PA
69. Shea D.L., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 604-614
70. Silverman I., Choi J., and Peters M. The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior 36 (2007) 261-268
71. Smith I.M. Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance (1964), University of London Press, London
72. Snow R.E. Commentary: Expanding the breadth and depth of admissions testing. In: Messick S. (Ed). Assessment in higher education (1999), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 133-140
73. Snow R.E., Corno L., and Jackson III D.N. Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In: Berliner D.C., and Calfee R.C. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (1996), MacMillan, New York 243-310
74. Snow R.E., and Lohman D.F. Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In: Linn R.L. (Ed). Educational measurement. 3rd ed. (1989), Macmillan, New York 263-332
75. Stanley J.C. In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In: Benbow C.P., and Lubinski D. (Eds). Intellectual talent (1996), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 225-235
76. Stanley J.C. Helping students learn only what they don't already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6 (2000) 216-222
77. Steen L.A. The science of patterns. Science 240 (1988, April 29) 611-616
78. Super D.E., and Bachrach P.B. Scientific careers and vocational development theory (1957), Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
79. Vandenberg S.G., and Kuse A.R. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47 (1978) 599-604
80. Vernon P.A. The structure of human abilities. 2nd ed. (1961), Methuen London, London
81. Wai J., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youth: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2005) 785-794
82. Webb R.M., Lubinski D., and Benbow C.P. Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2007) 397-420
83. Wise L.L., McLaughlin D.H., and Steel L. The Project TALENT data bank (1979), American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, CA