The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 26, Issue , 2013, Pages 20-29

  Sorby, Sheryl ^a   Casey, Beth ^b   Veurink, Norma ^a   Dulaney, Alana ^b  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Calculus performance; Engineering; Gender; Spatial skills; Spatial training

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878152039     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ACT The ACT technical manual Retrieved from. http://www.act.org/research/researchers/techmanuals.html.
2. Baenninger M., Newcombe N. The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 1989, 20(5-6):327-344. 10.1007/BF00287729.
3. Bodner G.M., Guay R.B. The Purdue visualization of rotations test. The Chemical Educator 1997, 2(4). Available from: http://chemeducator.org/bibs/0002004/00020138.htmhttp://chemeducator.org/bibs/0002004/00020138.htm.
4. Bremigan E.G. An analysis of diagram modification and construction in students' solutions to applied calculus problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2005, 36(3):248-277.
5. Brinkmann E.H. Programed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 1966, 50(2):179-184. 10.1037/h0023068.
6. Cappelleri J.C. Cutoff-based designs in comparison and combination with randomized clinical trials. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 1991.
7. Casey B.M. Spatial abilities and individual differences. Handbook of spatial cognition 2013, 117-134. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. D.A. Waller, L. Nadel (Eds.).
8. Casey M.B., Nuttall R.L., Pezaris E. Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology 1997, 33(4):669-680. 10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.669.
9. Casey M.B., Nuttall R., Pezaris E., Benbow C.P. The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology 1995, 31(4):697-705. 10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.697.
10. Cook T. Waiting for life to arrive: A history of the regression-discontinuity design in psychology, statistics, and economics. Journal of Econometrics 2008, 142(2):636-654. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.002.
11. Dhillon A.S. Individual differences within problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education 1998, 82(3):379-405. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<379::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-9.
12. Ferrini-Mundy J. Spatial training for calculus students: Sex differences in achievement and visualization ability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1987, 18:126-140.
13. Geary D.C., Saults S.J., Liu F., Hoard M.K. Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. Special Issue: Sex and Gender Development 2000, 77(4):337-353. 10.1006/jecp.2000.2594.
14. Gimmestad B.J. Gender differences in spatial visualization and predictors of success in an engineering design course. Proceedings of the national conference on women in mathematics and the sciences, St. Cloud, MN 1989, 133-136.
15. Guay R.B. Purdue spatial visualization test: Rotations 1977, Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, IN.
16. Halpern D.F., Benbow C.P., Geary D.C., Gur R.C., Hyde J.S., Gernsbache M.A. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2007, 8(1):1-51. 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
17. Hamlin A.J., Boersma N., Sorby S.A. Do spatial abilities impact the learning of 3-D solid modeling software?. Proceedings of the annual conference of ASEE. Chicago, IL. [CD-ROM] 2006.
18. Hsi S., Linn M.C., Bell J.E. The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education 1997, 86(2):151-158.
19. Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation Statistical bulletin 2005-4: Major field plots for the foundation's standard test battery 2005, Chris Condon and David Schroeder, USA.
20. Krajewski K., Ennemoser M. The impact of domain-specific precursors and visuospatial skills in kindergarten on mathematical school achievement in Grade 9. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO 2009.
21. Larkin J., McDermott J., Simon D.P., Simon H.A. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 1980, 208(4450):1335-1342. 10.1126/science.208.4450.1335.
22. Levine S.C., Huttenlocher J., Taylor A., Langrock A. Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35(4):940-949. 10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940.
23. Lippa R.A., Collaer M.L., Peters M. Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2010, 39(4):990-997. 10.1007/s10508-008-9460-8.
24. Lord T.R. Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1985, 22(5):395-405. 10.1002/tea.3660220503.
25. Maier P.H. Raeumliches vorstellungsvermoegen 1994, Lang, New York.
26. National Science Foundation, National Science Board Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation's human capital (NSB-10-33) Retrieved from. http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/stem/innovators.jsp.
27. Nemeth B. Measurement of the development of spatial ability by mental cutting test. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae 2007, 34:123-128.
28. Norman K.L. Spatial visualization-A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Special Education Technology 1994, 12(3):195-206.
29. Onyancha R.M., Derov M., Kinsey B.L. Improvements in spatial ability as a result of targeted training and computer-aided design software use: Analyses of object geometries and rotation types. Journal of Engineering Education, April 2009, 2009:157-167.
30. Pribyl J.R., Bodner G.M. Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1987, 24:229-240.
31. Prieto G., Velasco A.D. Does spatial visualization ability improve after studying technical drawing?. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 2010, 44(1015):1024.
32. Rubin D.B. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 1977, 2(1):1. 10.2307/1164933.
33. Schochet P., Cook T., Deke J., Imbens G., Lockwood J.R., Porter J., Smith J. Standards for regression discontinuity designs Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_rd.pdf.
34. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2001, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
35. Shadish W.R., Galindo R., Wong V.C., Steiner P.M., Cook T.D. A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment. Psychological Methods 2011, 16(2):179-191. 10.1037/a0023345.
36. Small M.Y., Morton M.E. Spatial visualization training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching 1983, 13(1983):41-43.
37. Smith I.M. Spatial ability-Its educational and social significance 1964, University of London, London.
38. Sorby S. Improving the spatial skills of engineering students: Impact on graphics performance and retention. Engineering Design Graphics Journal 2001, 65:30-35.
39. Sorby S. A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 2001, 7:153-172.
40. Sorby S. Assessment of a "new and improved" course for the development of 3-d spatial skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal 2005, 69:6-13.
41. Sorby S. Impact of changes in course methodologies on improving spatial skills. International Journal for Geometry and Graphics 2005, 9:99-105.
42. Sorby S. Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31:459-480.
43. Sorby S., Baartmans B. The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-d spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 2000, 89:301-307.
44. Sorby S., Wysocki A. Introduction to 3d spatial visualization: An active approach 2003, Thomson/Delmar Learning, Clifton Park. NJ.
45. Taasoobshirazi G., Carr M. Gender differences in science: An expertise perspective. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20(2):149-169. 10.1007/s10648-007-9067-y.
46. Terlecki M.S., Newcombe N.S., Little M. Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:996-1013.
47. Thistlethwaite D.L., Campbell D.T. Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology 1960, 51(6):309-317. 10.1037/h0044319.
48. Trochim W.M.K., Cappelleri J.C. Cutoff assignment strategies for enhancing randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1992, 13(3):190-212. 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90003-I.
49. U.S.Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences Technical methods report: Statistical power for regression discontinuity designs in education evaluations (NCEE 2008-4026) Retrieved from. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084026.pdf.
50. Uttal D.H. Training spatial skills: What works, for whom, and for how long?. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO 2009, April.
51. Voyer D., Voyer S., Bryden M.P. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117(2):250-270. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250.
52. Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(4):817-835. 10.1037/a0016127.
53. Waller A.A., Lourenco S. Proceedings from 40th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference: Special session-Frontiers of spatial cognition: Moving beyond rotating cubes 2010, ASEE/IEEE (American Society of Engineering Education/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), Washington, DC.
54. Zimmerman W. Visual thinking in calculus. Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics 1991, 127-137. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC. W. Zimmerman, S. Cunningham (Eds.).