Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 220-227

  Harackiewicz, Judith M ^a   Smith, Jessi L ^b   Priniski, Stacy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement gaps; education; educational policy; expectancy value; interest; motivation; personalization; problem based learning; social psychological interventions; utility value

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051166267     PISSN: 23727322     EISSN: 23727330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2372732216655542     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ainley M., (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychological Review, 18, 391-405. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
2. Belland B. R., Kim C., Hannafin M. J., (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48, 243-270. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
3. Berlyne D. E., (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 279-286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
4. Brophy J., (2008). Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43, 132-141. doi:10.1080/00461520701756511
5. Brown E. R., Smith J. L., Thoman D. B., Allen J. M., Muragishi G., (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1116-1135. doi:10.1037/edu0000033
6. Canning E. A., Harackiewicz J. M., (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly communicated and self-generated utility-value information. Motivation Science, 1, 47-71. doi:10.1037/mot0000015
7. Collins A., Halverson R., (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
8. Cordova D. I., Lepper M. R., (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 715-730. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
9. Dewey J., (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
10. Diekman A. B., Weisgram E. S., Belanger A. L., (2015). New routes to recruiting and retaining women in STEM: Policy implications of a communal goal congruity perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 52-88. doi:10.1111/sipr.12010
11. Durik A. M., Harackiewicz J. M., (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597-610. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597
12. Durik A. M., Hulleman C. S., Harackiewicz J. M., (2015). One size fits some: Instructional enhancements to promote interest don’t work the same for everyone. In Renninger K. A., Nieswandt M., Hidi S., (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 49-62). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
13. Durik A. M., Shechter O., Noh M. S., Rozek C. R., Harackiewicz J. M., (2015). What if I can’t? Perceived competence as a moderator of the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 104-118. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
14. Eccles J. S., (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78-89. doi:10:1080/00461520902832368
15. Eccles J. S., Adler T. F., Futterman R., Goff S. B., Kaczala C. M., Meece J. L., Midgley C., (1983). Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In Spense J. T., (Ed.), Perspective on achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman
16. Eccles J. S., Midgley C., Wigfield A., Buchanan C. M., Reuman D., Flanagan C., Mac Iver D., (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
17. Eccles J. S., Wigfield A., (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
18. Freeman S., Eddy S. L., McDonough M., Smith M. K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M. P., (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
19. Harackiewicz J. M., Canning E. A., Tibbetts Y., Priniski S. J., Hyde J. S., (2015). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspp0000075
20. Harackiewicz J. M., Durik A. M., Barron K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia L., Tauer J. M., (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
21. Harackiewicz J. M., Hulleman C. S., (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 42-52. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x
22. Harackiewicz J. M., Rozek C. R., Hulleman C. S., Hyde J. S., (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 43, 899-906. doi:10.1177/0956797611435530
23. Harackiewicz J. M., Tibbetts Y., Canning E. A., Hyde J. S., (2014). Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. In Karabenick S., Urden T., (Eds.), Motivational interventions: Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp. 71-105). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
24. Hidi S., (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69-82. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
25. Hidi S., Harackiewicz J. M., (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 79, 151-179. doi:10.2307/1170660
26. Hidi S., Renninger K. A., (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
27. Høgheim S., Reber R., (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 17-25. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006
28. Hulleman C. S., Durik A. M., Schweigert S. A., Harackiewicz J. M., (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398-416. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398
29. Hulleman C. S., Godes O., Hendricks B. L., Harackiewicz J. M., (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880-895. doi:10.1037/a0019506
30. Hulleman C. S., Harackiewicz J. M., (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
31. Hung W., Jonassen D. H., Liu R., (2008). Problem-based learning. In Spector J. M., Merrill M. D., Van Merrienboer J., Driscoll M. P., (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 485-506). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
32. Hyde J. S., Canning E. A., Rozek C. S., Clarke E., Hulleman C. S., Harackiewicz J. M., (2016). The role of mothers’ communication in promoting motivation for math and science course-taking in high school. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jora.12253
33. Knogler M., Harackiewicz J. M., Gegenfurtner A., Lewalter D., (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39-50. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004
34. Lakhan S. E., Hamlat E., McNamee T., Laird C., (2009). Time for a unified approach to medical ethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 4, Article 13. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-4-13
35. Palmer D. H., (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 147-165. doi:10.1002/tea.20263
36. Renninger K. A., Hidi S., (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge
37. Renninger K. A., Sansone C., Smith J. L., (2004). Love of learning. In Peterson C., Seligman M. E. P., (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 161-179). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
38. Rotgans J. I., Schmidt H. G., (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002
39. Rozek C. S., Svoboda R. C., Harackiewicz J. M., Hulleman C. S., Hyde J. S., (2016). A utility-value intervention with parents increases STEM preparation and career pursuit. Manuscript under review
40. Sansone C., Thoman D. B., (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175-186. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175
41. Shah N. D., (2008). The teaching of law in medical education. Virtual Mentor, 10, 332-337
42. Smith J. L., Brown E. R., Thoman D. L., Deemer E. D., (2015). Losing its expected communal value: How stereotype threat undermines women’s identity as research scientists. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 443-466. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9296-8
43. Smith J. L., Cech E., Metz A., Huntoon M., Moyer C., (2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 413-429. doi:10.1037/a0036945
44. Smith J. L., Wagaman J., Handley I. M., (2009). Keeping it dull or making it fun: Task variation as a function of promotion versus prevention focus. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 150-160. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9118-9
45. Thoman D. B., Brown E. R., Mason A. Z., Harmsen A. G., Smith J. L., (2015). The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for biomedicine. BioScience, 65, 183-188. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu199
46. Thoman D. B., Smith J. L., Silvia P., (2011). The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 592-599. doi:10.1177/1948550611402521
47. U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A new education law. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/essa
48. Walker A., Leary H., (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3, 12-43
49. Walkington C. A., (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 932-945. doi:10.1037/a0031882
50. Walkington C. A., Bernacki M. L., (2014). Motivating students by “personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 18, 139-176. doi:10.1108/S0749-742320140000018004
51. Yeager D. S., Romero C., Paunesku D., Hulleman C. S., Schneider B., Hinojosa C... Dweck C. S., (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374-391. doi:10.1037/edu0000098