Genomic Imprinting in the Endosperm is Systematically Perturbed in Abortive Hybrid Tomato Seeds

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2935-2946

  Florez Rueda, Ana M ^a,b   Paris, Margot ^a,c   Schmidt, Anja ^b,d   Widmer, Alex ^a   Grossniklaus, Ueli ^b   Städler, Thomas ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

endosperm; genomic imprinting; postzygotic isolation; seed failure; Solanum

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENDOSPERM; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENOME IMPRINTING; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRID; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; LASER MICRODISSECTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT SEED; SEED SIZE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM CHILENSE; SOLANUM PERUVIANUM; TOMATO; ALLELE; CHIMERA; DNA METHYLATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES;

ALLELES; CHIMERA; DNA METHYLATION; ENDOSPERM; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84994494804     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw175     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Autran D, Baroux C, Raissig MT, Lenormand T, Wittig M, Grob S, Steimer A, Barann M, Klostermeier UC, Leblanc O, et al. 2011. Maternal epigenetic pathways control parental contributions to Arabidopsis early embryogenesis. Cell 145:707-719.
2. Beamish KI. 1955. Seed failure following hybridization between the hexa-ploid Solanum demissum and four diploid Solanum species. Am J Bot. 42:297-304.
3. Birchler JA. 1993. Dosage analysis of maize endosperm development. Annu Rev Genet. 27:181-204.
4. Böndel KB, Lainer H, Nosenko T, Mboup M, Tellier A, Stephan W. 2015. North-south colonization associated with local adaptation of the wild tomato species Solanum chilense. Mol Biol Evol. 32:2932-2943.
5. Brandvain Y, Haig D. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. Am Nat. 166:330-338.
6. Briggs CL. 1993. Endosperm development in Solanum nigrum L. Formation of the zone of separation and secretion. Ann Bot. 72:303-313.
7. Brink RA, Cooper DC. 1947. The endosperm in seed development. Bot Rev. 13:423-541.
8. Burkart-Waco D, Ngo K, Dilkes B, Josefsson C, Comai L. 2013. Early disruption of maternal-zygotic interaction and activation of defense-like responses in Arabidopsis interspecific crosses. Plant Cell 25:2037-2055.
9. Burkart-Waco D, Ngo K, Lieberman M, Comai L. 2015. Perturbation of parentally biased gene expression during interspecific hybridization. PLoS ONE 10:e0117293.
10. Bushell C, Spielman M, Scott RJ. 2003. The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell 15:1430-1442.
11. Castillo DM, Moyle LC. 2012. Evolutionary implications of mechanistic models of TE-mediated hybrid incompatibility. Intl J Evol Biol. 2012: article ID 698198.
12. Cooper DC, Brink RA. 1940. Somatoplastic sterility as a cause of seed failure after interspecific hybridization. Genetics 25:593-617.
13. Cooper DC, Brink RA. 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30:376-410.
14. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
15. Crespi B, Nosil P. 2013. Conflictual speciation: species formation via genomic conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 28:48-57.
16. Dnyansagar VR, Cooper DC. 1960. Development of the seed of Solanum phureja. Am J Bot. 47:176-186.
17. Dumbliauskas E, Lechner E, Jaciubek M, Berr A, Pazhouhandeh M, Alioua M, Cognat V, Brukhin V, Koncz C, Grossniklaus U, et al. 2011. The Arabidopsis CUL4-DDB1 complex interacts with MSI1 and is required to maintain MEDEA parental imprinting. EMBO J. 30:731-743.
18. Florez-Rueda AM, Grossniklaus U, Schmidt A. 2016. Laser-assisted mi-crodissection (LAM) as a tool for transcriptional profiling of individual cell types. J Vis Exp. 111:e53916.
19. Garner AG, Kenney AM, Fishman L, Sweigart AL. 2016. Genetic loci with parent-of-origin effects cause hybrid seed lethality in crosses between Mimulus species. New Phytol. 211:319-331.
20. Gehring M. 2013. Genomic imprinting: insights from plants. Annu Rev Genet. 47:187-208.
21. Gehring M, Missirian V, Henikoff S. 2011. Genomic analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. PLoS ONE 6:e23687.
22. Gutierrez-Marcos JF, Pennington PD, Costa LM, Dickinson HG. 2003. Imprinting in the endosperm: a possible role in preventing wide hybridization. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 358:1105-1111.
23. Haig D. 2013. Kin conflict in seed development: an interdependent but fractious collective. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 29:189-211.
24. Haig D, Westoby M. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 333:1-13.
25. Hsieh T-F, Shin J, Uzawa R, Silva P, Cohen S, Bauer MJ, Hashimoto M, Kirkbride RC, Harada JJ, Zilberman D, et al. 2011. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:1755-1762.
26. Jiang H, Köhler C. 2012. Evolution, function, and regulation of genomic imprinting in plant seed development. J Exp Bot. 63:4713-4722.
27. Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Comai L. 2006. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecific hybridization. Curr Biol. 16:1322-1328.
28. Jullien PE, Katz A, Oliva M, Ohad N, Berger F. 2006. Polycomb group complexes self-regulate imprinting of the Polycomb group gene MEDEA in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 16:486-492.
29. Jullien PE, Berger F. 2010. Parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000885.
30. Kofler R, Pandey RV, Schlötterer C. 2011. PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq). Bioinformatics 27:3435-3436.
31. Köhler C, Page DR, Gagliardini V, Grossniklaus U. 2005. The Arabidopsis thaliana MEDEA Polycomb group protein controls expression of PHERES1 by parental imprinting. Nat Genet. 37:28-30.
32. Kradolfer D, Wolff P, Jiang H, Siretskiy A, Köhler C. 2013. An imprinted gene underlies postzygotic reproductive isolation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Cell. 26:525-535.
33. Lafon-Placette C, Köhler C. 2015. Epigenetic mechanisms of postzygotic reproductive isolation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 23:39-44.
34. Lester RN, Kang JH. 1998. Embryo and endosperm function and failure in Solanum species and hybrids. Ann Bot. 82:445-453.
35. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 genome project data processing subgroup. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
36. Lin BY. 1984. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107:103-115.
37. Lu J, Zhang C, Baulcombe DC, Chen ZJ. 2012. Maternal siRNAs as regulators of parental genome imbalance and gene expression in endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:5529-5534.
38. Luo M, Taylor JM, Spriggs A, Zhang H, Wu X, Russell S, Singh M, Koltunow A. 2011. A genome-wide survey of imprinted genes in rice seeds reveals imprinting primarily occurs in the endosperm. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002125.
39. Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.J 17:10-12.
40. Ng DW-K, Lu J, Chen ZJ. 2012. Big roles for small RNAs in polyploidy, hybrid vigor, and hybrid incompatibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15:154-161.
41. Oneal E, Willis JH, Franks RG. 2016. Disruption of endosperm development is a major cause of hybrid seed inviability between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nudatus. New Phytol. 210:1107-1120.
42. Pacini E, Sarfatti G. 1978. Reproductive calendar of Lycopersicon peru-vianum Mill. Bull Soc Bot France. 125:295-299.
43. Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S. 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Syst Bot Monogr. 84:1-186.
44. Pignatta D, Erdmann RM, Scheer E, Picard CL, Bell GW, Gehring M. 2014. Natural epigenetic polymorphisms lead to intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis gene imprinting. eLife 3:e03198.
45. Pires ND, Grossniklaus U. 2014. Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals. F1000Prime Rep. 6:63.
46. Raissig MT, Baroux C, Grossniklaus U. 2011. Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development. Plant Cell 23:16-26.
47. Rebernig CA, Lafon-Placette C, Hatorangan MR, Slotte T, Köhler C. 2015. Non-reciprocal interspecies hybridization barriers in the Capsella genus are established in the endosperm. PLoS Genet 11:e1005295.
48. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cited 16 June, 2016]. Available from: http://www.R- project.org/.
49. Rick CM. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD, editors. The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. New York: Academic Press. p. 667-678.
50. Rick CM. 1986. Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex. In: D'Arcy WG, editor. Solanaceae-biology and systemat-ics. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 477-495.
51. Rick CM, Lamm R. 1955. Biosystematic studies on the status of Lycopersicon chilense. Am J Bot. 42:663-675.
52. Rodrigues JA, Ruan R, Nishimura T, Sharma MK, Sharma R, Ronald PC, Fischer RL, Zilberman D. 2013. Imprinted expression of genes and small RNA is associated with localized hypomethylation of the maternal genome in rice endosperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:7934-7939.
53. Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG. 1998. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125:3329-3341.
54. Smeds L, Künstner A. 2011. ConDeTri - A content dependent read trimmer for Illumina data. PLoS One 6:e26314.
55. Stadler T, Roselius K, Stephan W. 2005. Genealogical footprints of spe-ciation processes in wild tomatoes: demography and evidence for historical gene flow. Evolution 59:1268-1279.
56. Stadler T, Arunyawat U, Stephan W. 2008. Population genetics of spe-ciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon). Genetics 178:339-350.
57. Tellier A, Laurent SJY, Lainer H, Pavlidis P, Stephan W. 2011. Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:17052-17057.
58. The Tomato Genome Consortium 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635-641.
59. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 28:511-515.
60. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. 2012. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protocols. 7:562-578.
61. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L 2013. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 31:46-53.
62. Videvall E, Sletvold N, Hagenblad J, Agren J, Hansson B. 2016. Strong maternal effects on gene expression in Arabidopsis lyrata hybrids. Mol Biol Evol. 33:984-994.
63. Vu TM, Nakamura M, Calarco JP, Susaki D, Lim PQ, Kinoshita T, Higashiyama T, Martienssen RA, Berger F. 2013. RNA-directed DNA methylation regulates parental genomic imprinting at several loci in Arabidopsis. Development 140:2953-2960.
64. Walia H, Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Kirkbride R Harada J, Comai L 2009. Dosage-dependent deregulation of an AGAMOUS-LIKE gene cluster contributes to interspecific incompatibility. Curr Biol. 19:1128-1132.
65. Waters AJ, Bilinski P, Eichten SR Vaughn MW, Ross-Ibarra J, Gehring M, Springer NM. 2013. Comprehensive analysis of imprinted genes in maize reveals allelic variation for imprinting and limited conservation with other species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:19639-19644.
66. Willi Y. 2013. The battle of the sexes over seed size: support for both kinship genomic imprinting and interlocus contest evolution. Am Nat. 181:787-798.
67. Wolf JB. 2009. Cytonuclear interactions can favor the evolution of genomic imprinting Evolution 63:1364-1371.
68. Wolf JB. 2013. Evolution of genomic imprinting as a coordinator of coadapted gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:5085-5090.
69. Wolff P, Weinhofer I, Seguin J, Roszak P, Beisel C, Donoghue MTA Spillane C, Nordborg M, Rehmsmeier M, Kohler C. 2011. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis endosperm. PLoS Genet 7:e1002126.
70. Wolff P, Jiang H, Wang G, Santos-Gonzalez J, Kohler C 2015. Paternally expressed imprinted genes establish postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 4:e10074.
71. Zhang M, Zhao H, Xie S, Chen J, Xu Y, Wang K, Zhao H, Guan H, Hu X, Jiao Y, et al. 2011. Extensive, clustered parental imprinting of protein-coding and noncoding RNAs in developing maize endosperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:20042-20047.