An imprinted gene underlies postzygotic reproductive isolation in arabidopsis thaliana

Developmental Cell

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 525-535

  Kradolfer, David ^a,b   Wolff, Philip ^a,b   Jiang, Hua ^a   Siretskiy, Alexey ^a   Köhler, Claudia ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMETOS GENE; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; ENDOSPERM; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME IMPRINTING; NONHUMAN; PLANT SEED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; TRIPLOIDY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; ENDOSPERM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLYPLOIDY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEEDS; ZYGOTE;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84884149888     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Austin R.S., Vidaurre D., Stamatiou G., Breit R., Provart N.J., Bonetta D., Zhang J., Fung P., Gong Y., Wang P.W., et al. Next-generation mapping of Arabidopsis genes. Plant J. 2011, 67:715-725.
2. Birchler J.A. Dosage analysis of maize endosperm development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1993, 27:181-204.
3. Birchler J.A., Bhadra U., Bhadra M.P., Auger D.L. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev. Biol. 2001, 234:275-288.
4. Birchler J.A., Veitia R.A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:14746-14753.
5. Bomblies K., Lempe J., Epple P., Warthmann N., Lanz C., Dangl J.L., Weigel D. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e236.
6. Brideau N.J., Barbash D.A. Functional conservation of the Drosophila hybrid incompatibility gene Lhr. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11:57.
7. Brideau N.J., Flores H.A., Wang J., Maheshwari S., Wang X., Barbash D.A. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality inDrosophila. Science 2006, 314:1292-1295.
8. Brink R., Cooper D. The endosperm in seed development. Bot. Rev. 1947, 132:479-541.
9. Chatterjee R.N., Chatterjee P., Pal A., Pal-Bhadra M. Drosophila simulans Lethal hybrid rescue mutation (Lhr) rescues inviable hybrids by restoring X chromosomal dosage compensation and causes fluctuating asymmetry of development. J.Genet. 2007, 86:203-215.
10. Costa L.M., Gutièrrez-Marcos J.F., Dickinson H.G. More than a yolk: the short life and complex times of the plant endosperm. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9:507-514.
11. Dai Y.S., Xu J., Molkentin J.D. The DnaJ-related factor Mrj interacts with nuclear factor of activated Tcells c3 and mediates transcriptional repression through class II histone deacetylase recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:9936-9948.
12. De Storme N., Copenhaver G.P., Geelen D. Production of diploid male gametes in Arabidopsis by cold-induced destabilization of postmeiotic radial microtubule arrays. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1808-1826.
13. d'Erfurth I., Jolivet S., Froger N., Catrice O., Novatchkova M., Mercier R. Turning meiosis into mitosis. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000124.
14. Dilkes B.P., Spielman M., Weizbauer R., Watson B., Burkart-Waco D., Scott R.J., Comai L. The maternally expressed WRKY transcription factor TTG2 controls lethality in interploidy crosses of Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:2707-2720.
15. Erilova A., Brownfield L., Exner V., Rosa M., Twell D., Mittelsten Scheid O., Hennig L., Köhler C. Imprinting of the polycomb group gene MEDEA serves as a ploidy sensor in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000663.
16. Gutierrez-Marcos J.F., Pennington P.D., Costa L.M., Dickinson H.G. Imprinting in the endosperm: a possible role in preventing wide hybridization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358:1105-1111.
17. Haig D., Westoby M. Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. Am. Nat. 1989, 134:147-155.
18. Hehenberger E., Kradolfer D., Köhler C. Endosperm cellularization defines an important developmental transition for embryo development. Development 2012, 139:2031-2039.
19. Kinoshita T. Reproductive barrier and genomic imprinting in the endosperm of flowering plants. Genes Genet. Syst. 2007, 82:177-186.
20. Ngo Q.A., Moore J.M., Baskar R., Grossniklaus U., Sundaresan V. Arabidopsis GLAUCE promotes fertilization-independent endosperm development and expression of paternally inherited alleles. Development 2007, 134:4107-4117.
21. Herridge R.P., Day R.C., Baldwin S., Macknight R.C. Rapid analysis of seed size in Arabidopsis for mutant and QTL discovery. Plant Methods 2011, 7:3.
22. Hsieh T.F., Shin J., Uzawa R., Silva P., Cohen S., Bauer M.J., Hashimoto M., Kirkbride R.C., Harada J.J., Zilberman D., Fischer R.L. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:1755-1762.
23. Johnston S., Nijs T., Peloquin S., Hanneman R. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1980, 57:5-9.
24. Josefsson C., Dilkes B., Comai L. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1322-1328.
25. Jullien P.E., Berger F. Parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000885.
26. Kampinga H.H., Craig E.A. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:579-592.
27. Köhler C., Wolff P., Spillane C. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying genomic imprinting in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:331-352.
28. Kradolfer D., Hennig L., Köhler C. Increased maternal genome dosage bypasses the requirement of the FIS polycomb repressive complex 2 in Arabidopsis seed development. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003163.
29. Langmead B., Trapnell C., Pop M., Salzberg S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:R25.
30. Li J., Berger F. Endosperm: food for humankind and fodder for scientific discoveries. New Phytol. 2012, 195:290-305.
31. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2078-2079. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup.
32. Marks G. The origin and significance of intraspecific polyploidy: experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 1966, 20:552-557.
33. Moore T., Haig D. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 1991, 7:45-49.
34. Nowack M.K., Shirzadi R., Dissmeyer N., Dolf A., Endl E., Grini P.E., Schnittger A. Bypassing genomic imprinting allows seed development. Nature 2007, 447:312-315.
35. Otto S.P., Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2000, 34:401-437.
36. Rajan V.B., D'Silva P. Arabidopsis thaliana J-class heat shock proteins: cellular stress sensors. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2009, 9:433-446.
37. Ramsey J., Schemske D. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29:467-501.
38. Rieseberg L.H., Willis J.H. Plant speciation. Science 2007, 317:910-914.
39. Scott R.J., Spielman M., Bailey J., Dickinson H.G. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1998, 125:3329-3341.
40. Simon P. Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1439-1440.
41. Smith F.M., Garfield A.S., Ward A. Regulation of growth and metabolism by imprinted genes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2006, 113:279-291.
42. Tiwari S., Spielman M., Schulz R., Oakey R.J., Kelsey G., Salazar A., Zhang K., Pennell R., Scott R.J. Transcriptional profiles underlying parent-of-origin effects in seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:72.
43. Veitia R.A. Nonlinear effects in macromolecular assembly and dosage sensitivity. J.Theor. Biol. 2003, 220:19-25.
44. Vrana P.B., Fossella J.A., Matteson P., del Rio T., O'Neill M.J., Tilghman S.M. Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:120-124.
45. Walia H., Josefsson C., Dilkes B., Kirkbride R., Harada J., Comai L. Dosage-dependent deregulation of an AGAMOUS-LIKE gene cluster contributes to interspecific incompatibility. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1128-1132.
46. Wang Y.J., Brock H.W. Polyhomeotic stably associates with molecular chaperones Hsc4 and Droj2 in Drosophila Kc1 cells. Dev. Biol. 2003, 262:350-360.
47. Weinhofer I., Hehenberger E., Roszak P., Hennig L., Köhler C. H3K27me3 profiling of the endosperm implies exclusion of polycomb group protein targeting by DNA methylation. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001152.
48. Weijers D., Geldner N., Offringa R., Jürgens G. Seed development: Early paternal gene activity in Arabidopsis. Nature 2001, 414:709-710.
49. Wolff P., Weinhofer I., Seguin J., Roszak P., Beisel C., Donoghue M.T., Spillane C., Nordborg M., Rehmsmeier M., Köhler C. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002126.
50. Woodell S.R.J., Valentine D.H. Studies in British primulas. IX. Seed incompatibility in diploid-autotetraploid crosses. New Phytol. 1961, 60:282-294.
51. Zeh D.W., Zeh J.A. Reproductive mode and speciation: the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis. Bioessays 2000, 22:938-946.