North-south colonization associated with local adaptation of the wild tomato species solanum chilense

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2932-2943

  Böndel, Katharina B ^a   Lainer, Hilde ^a   Nosenko, Tetyana ^a   Mboup, Mamadou ^b   Tellier, Aurélien ^c   Stephan, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

demography; local adaptation; plant population genetics; positive selection; wild tomato

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CHILE; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL RECOLONIZATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HABITAT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PERU; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; PURIFYING SELECTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOLANUM CHILENSE; SOUTH AMERICA; SPECIES CULTIVATION; TOMATO; WILD PLANT; ACCLIMATIZATION; ADAPTATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION DENSITY; SOLANUM;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, PLANT; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOLANUM; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 84946123339     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv166     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alberto FJ, Derory J, Boury C, Frigerio JM, Zimmermann NE, Kremer A. 2013. Imprints of natural selection along environmental gradients in phenology-related genes of Quercus petraea. Genetics 195:495-512.
2. Albrecht E, Escobar M, Chetelat RT. 2010. Genetic diversity and population structure in the tomato-like nightshades Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens. Ann Bot. 105:535-554.
3. Arunyawat U, Stephan W, Steadler T. 2007. Using multilocus sequence data to assess population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in wild tomatoes. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2310-2322.
4. Baudry E, Kerdelhue C, Innan H, Stephan W. 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158:1725-1735.
5. Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A. 2004. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1350-1360.
6. Charlesworth J, Eyre-Walker A. 2008. The McDonald-Kreitman test and slightly deleterious mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1007-1015.
7. Chetelat RT, Pertuz-e RA, Fa-undez L, Graham EB, Jones CM. 2009. Distribution, ecology and reproductive biology of wild tomatoes and related nightshades from the Atacama Desert region of northern Chile. Euphytica 167:77-93.
8. Cullingham CI, Cooke JE, Coltman DW. 2014. Cross-species outlier detection reveals different evolutionary pressures between sister species. New Phytol. 204:215-229.
9. Doganlar S, Frary A, Tanksley SD. 2000. The genetic basis of seed-weight variation: tomato as a model system. Theor Appl Genet. 100:1267-1273.
10. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2009. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol. 26:2097-2108.
11. Fenner M, Thompson K. 2005. The ecology of seeds. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
12. Fischer I, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Allal F, Stephan W. 2011. Adaptation to drought in two wild tomato species: the evolution of the Asr gene family. New Phytol. 190:1032-1044.
13. Fischer I, Steige KA, Stephan W, Mboup M. 2013. Sequence evolution and expression regulation of stress-responsive genes in natural populations of wild tomato. PLoS One 8:e78182.
14. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. 2008. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:977-993.
15. Gossmann TI, Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2012. The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 4:658-667.
16. Gossmann TI, Song BH, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Dixon CJ, Kapralov MV, Filatov DA, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1822-1832.
17. Graham EB, Shannon SM, Petersen JP, Chetelat RT. 2003. A selfcompatible population of Lycopersicon peruvianum collected from N. Chile. TGC 53:22-24.
18. Geunther T, Coop G. 2013. Robust identification of local adaptation from allele frequencies. Genetics 195:205-220.
19. Guti-errez JR, Meserve PL. 2003. El Nino effects on soil seed bank dynamics in north-central Chile. Oecologia 134:511-517.
20. Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Ezcurra E, Guti-errez JR, Mohren GM. 2001. El Nino effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol. 16:89-94.
21. Heorger AC, Ilyas M, Stephan W, Tellier A, van der Hoorn RA, Rose LE. 2012. Balancing selection at the tomato RCR3 guardee gene family maintains variation in strength of pathogen defense. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002813.
22. Hough J, Williamson RJ, Wright SI. 2013. Patterns of selection in plant genomes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 44:31-49.
23. Houston J. 2006. Variability of precipitation in the Atacama Desert: Its causes and hydrological impact. Int J Climatol. 26:2181-2198.
24. Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP. 1992. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583-589.
25. Husband BC, Barrett SCH. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J Ecol. 84:461-469.
26. Innan H, Kim Y. 2008. Detecting local adaptation using the joint sampling of polymorphism data in the parental and derived populations. Genetics 179:1713-1720.
27. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. 1997. Evolution of a species? range. Am Nat. 150:1-23.
28. Lange BW, Langley CH, Stephan W. 1990. Molecular evolution of Drosophila metallothionein genes. Genetics 126:921-932.
29. Leimu R, Fischer M. 2008. A meta-Analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3:e4010.
30. Li H. Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
31. Lunter G, Goodson M. 2011. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 21:936-939.
32. Manga VK, Yadav OP. 1995. Effect of seed size on developmental traits and ability to tolerate drought in pearl millet. J Arid Environ. 29:169-172.
33. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
34. Mboup M, Fischer I, Lainer H, Stephan W. 2012. Trans-species polymorphism and allele-specific expression in the CBF gene family of wild tomatoes. Mol Biol Evol. 29:3641-3652.
35. McDonald JH, KreitmanM. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
36. Moyle LC. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution 62:2995-3013.
37. Nakazato T, Franklin RA, Kirk BC, Housworth EA. 2012. Population structure, demographic history, and evolutionary patterns of a green-fruited tomato, Solanum peruvianum (Solanaceae), revealed by spatial genetics analyses. Am J Bot. 99:1207-1216.
38. Nakazato T, Housworth EA. 2011. Spatial genetics of wild tomato species reveals roles of the Andean geography on demographic history. Am J Bot. 98:88-98.
39. Nakazato T, Warren DL, Moyle LC. 2010. Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. Am J Bot. 97:680-693.
40. Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 76:5269-5273.
41. Obbard DJ, Welch JJ, Kim KW, Jiggins FM. 2009. Quantifying adaptive evolution in the Drosophila immune system. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000698.
42. Orellana S, Y-Anez M, Espinoza A, Verdugo I, Gonz-Alez E, Ruiz-Lara S, Casaretto JA. 2010. The transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 33:2191-2208.
43. Peralta IE, Spooner A, Knapp S. 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicoides; Solanaceae). Syst Bot Monogr. 84:1-186.
44. Pickrell JK, Pritchard JK. 2012. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002967.
45. Pluess AR, ScheutzW, Steocklin J. 2005. Seed weight increases with altitude in the Swiss Alps between related species but not among populations of individual species. Oecologia 144:55-61.
46. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for statistical Computing (editor).
47. Rick CM, Fobes JF, Tanksley SD. 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Plant Syst Evol. 132:279-298.
48. Rick CM, Tanksley SD. 1981. Genetic variation in Solanum pennellii: comparisons with two other sympatric tomato species. Plant Syst Evol. 139:11-45.
49. Riebler A, Held L, Stephan W. 2008. Bayesian variable selection for detecting adaptive genomic differences among populations. Genetics 178:1817-1829.
50. Roselius K, Stephan W, Steadler T. 2005. The relationship of nucleotide polymorphism, recombination rate and selection in wild tomato species. Genetics 171:753-763.
51. Searkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S. 2013. A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-Dip tree. BMC Evol Biol. 13:214.
52. Slotte T, Hazzouri KM, Agren JA, Koenig D, Maumus F, Guo YL, Steige K, Platts AE, Escobar JS, Newman LK, et al. 2013. The Capsella rubella genome and the genomic consequences of rapid mating system evolution. Nat Genet. 45:831-835.
53. Steadler T, Arunyawat U, Stephan W. 2008. Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon). Genetics 178:339-350.
54. Steadler T, Roselius K, Stephan W. 2005. Genealogical footprints of speciation processes in wild tomatoes: demography and evidence for historical gene flow. Evolution 59:1268-1279.
55. Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H. 2005. RAxMLiII: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456-463.
56. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595.
57. Tamura T, Hara K, Yamaguchi Y, Koizumi N, Sano H. 2003. Osmotic stress tolerance of transgenic tobacco expressing a gene encoding a membrane-located receptor-like protein from tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 131:454-462.
58. Tellier A, Fischer I, Merino C, Xia H, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Steadler T, Stephan W. 2011. Fitness effects of derived deleterious mutations in four closely related wild tomato species with spatial structure. Heredity (Edinb) 107:189-199.
59. Tellier A, Laurent SJY, Lainer H, Pavlidis P, Stephan W. 2011. Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:17052-17057.
60. Turner TL, Bourne EC, Von Wettberg EJ, Hu TT, Nuzhdin SV. 2010. Population resequencing reveals local adaptation of Arabidopsis lyrata to serpentine soils. Nat Genet. 42:260-263.
61. Wang H, Huang Z, Chen Q, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wu Y, Huang D, Huang R. 2004. Ectopic overexpression of tomato JERF3 in tobacco activates downstream gene expression and enhances salt tolerance. PlantMol Biol. 55:183-192.
62. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276.
63. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37:433-458.
64. Wu L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wang XC, Huang R. 2008. Transcriptional modulation of ethylene response factor protein JERF3 in the oxidative stress response enhances tolerance of tobacco seedlings to salt, drought, and freezing. Plant Physiol. 148:1953-1963.
65. Xia H, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Stephan W, Tellier A, Zhang Z. 2010. Nucleotide diversity patterns of local adaptation at drought-related candidate genes in wild tomatoes. Mol Ecol. 19:4144-4154.
66. Y-Anez M, C-Aceres S, Orellana S, Bastias A, Verdugo I, Ruiz-Lara S, Casaretto JA. 2009. An abiotic stress-responsive bZIP transcription factor from wild and cultivated tomatoes regulates stress-related genes. Plant Cell Rep. 28:1497-1507.
67. Zuellig MP, Kenney AM, Sweigart AL. 2014. Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation: insights from new model systems. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 18C:44-50.