Genetic loci with parent-of-origin effects cause hybrid seed lethality in crosses between Mimulus species

New Phytologist

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 319-331

  Garner, Austin G ^a   Kenney, Amanda M ^a,b   Fishman, Lila ^c   Sweigart, Andrea L ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^b ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid incompatibilities; Hybrid lethality; Mimulus (monkeyflower); Parent of origin effects; Speciation

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; CYTOPLASMIC INCOMPATIBILITY; DIVERGENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HERB; HYBRID; MATERNAL EFFECT; MORTALITY; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEED;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS GUTTATUS; MIMULUS TILINGII;

CHIMERA; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; MIMULUS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT SEED; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

CHIMERA; CROSSES, GENETIC; MIMULUS; PLANT BREEDING; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEEDS;

EID: 84959297238     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13897     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Andolfatto P, Davison D, Erezyilmaz D, Hu TT, Mast J, Sunayama-Morita T, Stern DL. 2011. Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Research 21: 610-617.
2. Beardsley PM, Yen A, Olmstead RG. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 1397-1410.
3. Beavis WD. 1998. QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Patterson AH, ed. Molecular dissection of complex traits. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 145-162.
4. Birchler JA. 1993. Dosage analysis of maize endosperm development. Annual Review of Genetics 27: 181-204.
5. Birchler JA, Bhadra U, Bhadra MP, Auger DL. 2001. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Developmental Biology 234: 275-288.
6. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2012. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 14746-14753.
7. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, Dangl JL, Weigel D. 2007. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biology 5: e236.
8. Brandvain Y, Haig D. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. The American Naturalist 166: 330-338.
9. Brandvain Y, Kenney AM, Flagel L, Coop G, Sweigart AL. 2014. Speciation and introgression between Mimulus nasutus and Mimulus guttatus. PLoS Genetics 10: e1004410.
10. Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang XU, Barbash DA. 2006. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292-1295.
11. Brink RA, Cooper DC. 1947. The endosperm in seed development. The Botanical Review 13: 479-541.
12. Burkart-Waco D, Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Kozloff N, Torjek O, Meyer R, Altmann T, Comai L. 2012. Hybrid incompatibility in Arabidopsis is determined by a multiple-locus genetic network. Plant Physiology 158: 801-812.
13. Cao J, Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, Günther T, Bender S, Fitz J, Koenig D, Lanz C, Stegle O, Lippert C et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nature Genetics 43: 956-963.
14. Christie P, Macnair MR. 1987. The distribution of postmating reproductive isolating genes in populations of the yellow monkey flower, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 41: 571-578.
15. Cooper DC, Brink RA. 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30: 376.
16. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
17. Dilkes BP, Comai L. 2004. A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development. The Plant Cell 16: 3174-3180.
18. Dobzhansky TH. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
19. Erilova A, Brownfield L, Exner V, Rosa M, Twell D, Scheid OM, Hennig L, Kohler C. 2009. Imprinting of the polycomb group gene MEDEA serves as a ploidy sensor in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000663.
20. Fishman L, Beardsley PM, Stathos A, Williams CF, Hill JP. 2015. The genetic architecture of traits associated with the evolution of self-pollination in Mimulus. New Phytologist 205: 907-917.
21. Fishman L, Kelly AJ, Morgan E, Willis JH. 2001. A genetic map in the Mimulus guttatus species complex reveals transmission ratio distortion due to heterospecific interactions. Genetics 159: 1701-1716.
22. Fishman L, Saunders A. 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322: 1559-1562.
23. Fishman L, Willis JH. 2005. A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in Mimulus monkeyflower hybrids. Genetics 169: 347-353.
24. Fishman L, Willis JH. 2006. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 60: 1372-1381.
25. Gehring M, Bubb KL, Henikoff S. 2009. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 324: 1447-1451.
26. Gutierrez-Marcos JF, Pennington PD, Costa LM, Dickinson HG. 2003. Imprinting in the endosperm: a possible role in preventing wide hybridization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 358: 1105-1111.
27. Haig D, Westoby M. 1989. Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. The American Naturalist 134: 147-155.
28. Haig D, Westoby M. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 333: 1-13.
29. Hall MC, Basten CJ, Willis JH. 2006. Pleiotropic quantitative trait loci contribute to population divergence in traits associated with life-history variation in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 172: 1829-1844.
30. Hall MC, Willis JH. 2005. Transmission ratio distortion in intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus implications for genomic divergence. Genetics 170: 375-386.
31. Holeski LM, Monnahan P, Koseva B, McCool N, Lindroth RL, Kelly JK. 2014. A high-resolution genetic map of yellow monkeyflower identifies chemical defense QTLs and recombination rate variation. G3: Genes - Genomes - Genetics 4: 813-821.
32. Hsieh TF, Ibarra CA, Silva P, Zemach A, Eshed-Williams L, Fischer RL, Zilberman D. 2009. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 324: 1451-1454.
33. Ishikawa R, Ohnishi T, Kinoshita Y, Eiguchi M, Kurata N, Kinoshita T. 2011. Rice interspecies hybrids show precocious or delayed developmental transitions in the endosperm without change to the rate of syncytial nuclear division. The Plant Journal 65: 798-806.
34. Johnston SA, Den Nijs TPM, Peloquin SJ, Hanneman RE. 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57: 5-9.
35. Johnston SA, Hanneman RE. 1982. Manipulations of endosperm balance number overcome crossing barriers between diploid Solanum species. Science 217: 446-448.
36. Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Comai L. 2006. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Current Biology 16: 1322-1328.
37. Jullien PE, Berger F. 2010. Parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 6: e1000885.
38. Kirkpatrick M, Barton N. 2006. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173: 419-434.
39. Köhler C, Scheid OM, Erilova A. 2010. The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants. Trends in Genetics 26: 142-148.
40. Köhler C, Wolff P, Spillane C. 2012. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying genomic imprinting in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63: 331-352.
41. Kradolfer D, Wolff P, Jiang H, Siretskiy A, Köhler C. 2013. An imprinted gene underlies postzygotic reproductive isolation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Developmental Cell 26: 525-535.
42. Lindsay DW, Vickery RK. 1967. Comparative evolution in Mimulus guttatus of the Bonneville Basin. Evolution 21: 439-456.
43. Lowry DB, Hall MC, Salt DE, Willis JH. 2009. Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 183: 776-788.
44. Lowry DB, Willis JH. 2010. A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biology 8: 2227.
45. Muller HJ. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biological Symposium 6: 71-125.
46. Navarro A, Barton NH. 2003. Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57: 447-459.
47. Noor MA, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 12084-12088.
48. Oneal E, Lowry DB, Wright KM, Zhu Z, Willis JH. 2014. Divergent population structure and climate associations of a chromosomal inversion polymorphism across the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Molecular Ecology 23: 2844-2860.
49. Oneal E, Willis JH, Franks R. 2015. Disruption of endosperm development is a major cause of hybrid seed inviability between Mimulus guttatus and M. nudatus. bioRxiv: 029223.
50. Piedrahita JA. 2011. The role of imprinted genes in fetal growth abnormalities. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 91: 682-692.
51. Pignatta D, Erdmann RM, Scheer E, Picard CL, Bell GW, Gehring M. 2014. Natural epigenetic polymorphisms lead to intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis gene imprinting. eLife 3: e03198.
52. Presgraves DC, Balagopalan L, Abmayr SM, Orr HA. 2003. Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
53. Puzey J, Vallejo-Marín M. 2014. Genomics of invasion: diversity and selection in introduced populations of monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus. Molecular Ecology 23: 4472-4485.
54. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501.
55. Rebernig CA, Lafon-Placette C, Hatorangan MR, Slotte T, Köhler C. 2015. Non-reciprocal interspecies hybridization barriers in the Capsella genus are established in the endosperm. PLoS Genetics 11: e1005295.
56. Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG. 1998. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 3329-3341.
57. Searcy KB, Macnair MR. 1990. Differential seed production in Mimulus guttatus in response to increasing concentrations of copper in the pistil by pollen from copper tolerant and sensitive sources. Evolution 44: 1424-1435.
58. Sekine D, Ohnishi T, Furuumi H, Ono A, Yamada T, Kurata N, Kinoshita T. 2013. Dissection of two major components of the post-zygotic hybridization barrier in rice endosperm. The Plant Journal 76: 792-799.
59. Sicard A, Kappel C, Josephs EB, Lee YW, Marona C, Stinchcombe JR, Wright SI, Lenhard M. 2015. Divergent sorting of a balanced ancestral polymorphism underlies the establishment of gene-flow barriers in Capsella. Nature Communications 6: 7960.
60. Spencer HG, Clark AG. 2014. Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting. Heredity 113: 112-118.
61. Stebbins GL. 1957. The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Advances in Genetics 9: 147-215.
62. Sweigart AL, Fishman L, Willis JH. 2006. A simple genetic incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in Mimulus. Genetics 172: 2465-2479.
63. Sweigart AL, Flagel LE. 2015. Evidence of natural selection acting on a polymorphic hybrid incompatibility locus in Mimulus. Genetics 199: 543-554.
64. Tang S, Presgraves DC. 2009. Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323: 779-782.
65. Tenaillon MI, Hollister JD, Gaut BS. 2010. A triptych of the evolution of plant transposable elements. Trends in Plant Science 15: 471-478.
66. Thompson WP. 1930. Causes of difference in success of reciprocal interspecific crosses. The American Naturalist 64: 407-421.
67. Tiffin P, Olson S, Moyle LC. 2001. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 861-867.
68. Turelli M, Moyle LC. 2007. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 176: 1059-1088.
69. Twyford AD, Friedman J. 2015. Adaptive divergence in the monkey flower Mimulus guttatus is maintained by a chromosomal inversion. Evolution 69: 1476-1486.
70. Valentine DH, Woodell SRJ. 1963. Studies in British Primulas. X. Seed incompatibility in intraspecific and interspecific crosses at diploid and tetraploid levels. New Phytologist 62: 125-143.
71. Van Ooijen JW. 2011. Multipoint maximum likelihood mapping in a full-sib family of an outbreeding species. Genetics Research 93: 343-349.
72. Van Ooijen JW, Kyazma BV. 2009. MapQTL 6. Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations of diploid species. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Kyazma BV.
73. Vickery RK Jr. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evolutionary Biology 11: 405-507.
74. Vrana PB, Fossella JA, Matteson P, del Rio T, O'Neill MJ, Tilghman SM. 2000. Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nature Genetics 25: 120-124.
75. Waters AJ, Bilinski P, Eichten SR, Vaughn MW, Ross-Ibarra J, Gehring M, Springer NM. 2013. Comprehensive analysis of imprinted genes in maize reveals allelic variation for imprinting and limited conservation with other species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110: 19639-19644.
76. Wittbrodt J, Adam D, Malitschek B, Mäueler W, Raulf F, Telling A, Robertson SM, Schartl M. 1989. Novel putative receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the melanoma-inducing Tu locus in Xiphophorus. Nature 341: 415-421.
77. Wolf JB, Hager R. 2006. A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biology 4: e380.
78. Wolf JB, Oakey RJ, Feil R. 2014. Imprinted gene expression in hybrids: perturbed mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Heredity 113: 167-175.
79. Wolff P, Jiang H, Wang G, Santos-González J, Köhler C. 2015. Paternally expressed imprinted genes establish postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 4: e10074.
80. Wolff P, Weinhofer I, Seguin J, Roszak P, Beisel C, Donoghue MT, Spillane C, Nordborg M, Rehmsmeier M, Köhler C. 2011. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis endosperm. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002126.
81. Woodell SRJ, Valentine DH. 1961. Studies in British Primulas IX. Seed incompatibility in diploid-autotetraploid crosses. New Phytologist 60: 282-294.
82. Yang J, Zhao X, Cheng K, Du H, Ouyang Y, Chen J, Qiu S, Huang J, Jiang Y, Jiang L et al. 2012. A killer-protector system regulates both hybrid sterility and segregation distortion in rice. Science 337: 1336-1340.