Erratum: Directed Evolution Reveals Unexpected Epistatic Interactions That Alter Metabolic Regulation and Enable Anaerobic Xylose Use by Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PLoS Genetics (2016) 12:10 (e1006372) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006372);Directed Evolution Reveals Unexpected Epistatic Interactions That Alter Metabolic Regulation and Enable Anaerobic Xylose Use by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Sato, Trey K ^a   Tremaine, Mary ^a   Parreiras, Lucas S ^a   Hebert, Alexander S ^a   Myers, Kevin S ^a   Higbee, Alan J ^a   Sardi, Maria ^a   McIlwain, Sean J ^a   Ong, Irene M ^a   Breuer, Rebecca J ^a   Avanasi Narasimhan, Ragothaman ^a   McGee, Mick A ^a   Dickinson, Quinn ^a   La Reau, Alex ^a   Xie, Dan ^a   Tian, Mingyuan ^a,b   Reed, Jennifer L ^a,b   Zhang, Yaoping ^a   Coon, Joshua J ^a,c   Hittinger, Chris Todd ^a   Gasch, Audrey P ^a   Landick, Robert ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BIOFUEL; CARBON; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; GLUCOSE; HOG1 PROTEIN; IRON SULFUR PROTEIN; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE; PROTEIN; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLOSE; XYLOSE ISOMERASE; HOG1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ISU1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOGENESIS; CARBON METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISTASIS; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; METABOLIC REGULATION; METABOLOMICS; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS; YEAST CELL; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION;

ANAEROBIOSIS; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLUCOSE; IRON-SULFUR PROTEINS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MUTATION; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; XYLOSE;

EID: 84994310843     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1006447     Document Type: Erratum

References (95)

1. Kricka W, Fitzpatrick J, Bond U, Challenges for the production of bioethanol from biomass using recombinant yeasts. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2015;92:89–125. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2015.02.00326003934.
2. Kim SR, Park YC, Jin YS, Seo JH, Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnology advances. 2013;31(6):851–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.00423524005.
3. Van Vleet JH, Jeffries TW, Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):300–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.06.00119545992.
4. Hahn-Hagerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(5):937–53. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0827-217294186.
5. Cai Z, Zhang B, Li Y, Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: reflections and perspectives. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(1):34–46. doi: 10.1002/biot.20110005322147620.
6. Bera AK, Ho NW, Khan A, Sedlak M, A genetic overhaul of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) to improve xylose fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38(5):617–26. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0806-620714780.
7. Demeke MM, Dietz H, Li Y, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Mutturi S, Deprez S, et al. Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2013;6(1):89. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-8923800147; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3698012.
8. Kim SR, Skerker JM, Kang W, Lesmana A, Wei N, Arkin AP, et al. Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e57048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.005704823468911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3582614.
9. Reider Apel A, Ouellet M, Szmidt-Middleton H, Keasling JD, Mukhopadhyay A, Evolved hexose transporter enhances xylose uptake and glucose/xylose co-utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19512. doi: 10.1038/srep1951226781725; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4726032.
10. Parreiras LS, Breuer RJ, Avanasi Narasimhan R, Higbee AJ, La Reau A, Tremaine M, et al. Engineering and two-stage evolution of a lignocellulosic hydrolysate-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for anaerobic fermentation of xylose from AFEX pretreated corn stover. PloS one. 2014;9(9):e107499. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4164640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010749925222864
11. Kuhn A, van Zyl C, van Tonder A, Prior BA, Purification and partial characterization of an aldo-keto reductase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1995;61(4):1580–5. 7747971; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC167412.
12. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA, Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999;15(10A):879–92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199907)15:10A<879::AID-YEA428>3.0.CO;2-Q10407268.
13. Traff KL, Otero Cordero RR, van Zyl WH, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Deletion of the GRE3 aldose reductase gene and its influence on xylose metabolism in recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the xylA and XKS1 genes. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2001;67(12):5668–74. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5668–5674.200111722921; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC93358.
14. Pfeiffer T, Morley A, An evolutionary perspective on the Crabtree effect. Front Mol Biosci. 2014;1:17. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2014.0001725988158; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4429655.
15. Broach JR, Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast. Genetics. 2012;192(1):73–105. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.13573122964838; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3430547.
16. Conrad M, Schothorst J, Kankipati HN, Van Zeebroeck G, Rubio-Texeira M, Thevelein JM, Nutrient sensing and signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS microbiology reviews. 2014;38(2):254–99. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.1206524483210; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4238866.
17. Gancedo JM, The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS microbiology reviews. 2008;32(4):673–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00117.x18559076.
18. Hedbacker K, Carlson M, SNF1/AMPK pathways in yeast. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2408–20. doi: 10.2741/285417981722; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2685184.
19. Kayikci O, Nielsen J, Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(6). doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov06826205245; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4629793.
20. Kim JH, Roy A, Jouandot D, 2ndCho KH, The glucose signaling network in yeast. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1830(11):5204–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.07.02523911748; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3785329.
21. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR, How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:27–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.13020618303986.
22. Colombo S, Ma P, Cauwenberg L, Winderickx J, Crauwels M, Teunissen A, et al. Involvement of distinct G-proteins, Gpa2 and Ras, in glucose- and intracellular acidification-induced cAMP signalling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1998;17(12):3326–41. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.12.33269628870; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1170671.
23. Dihazi H, Kessler R, Eschrich K, Glucose-induced stimulation of the Ras-cAMP pathway in yeast leads to multiple phosphorylations and activation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase. Biochemistry. 2003;42(20):6275–82. doi: 10.1021/bi034167r12755632.
24. Portela P, Howell S, Moreno S, Rossi S, In vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of two isoforms of yeast pyruvate kinase by protein kinase A. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(34):30477–87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M20109420012063246.
25. Cameroni E, Hulo N, Roosen J, Winderickx J, De Virgilio C, The novel yeast PAS kinase Rim 15 orchestrates G0-associated antioxidant defense mechanisms. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(4):462–8. 15300954.
26. Pedruzzi I, Burckert N, Egger P, De Virgilio C, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras/cAMP pathway controls post-diauxic shift element-dependent transcription through the zinc finger protein Gis1. EMBO J. 2000;19(11):2569–79. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.11.256910835355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC212766.
27. Ozcan S, Johnston M, Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63(3):554–69. 10477308; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC103746.
28. Ozcan S, Dover J, Rosenwald AG, Wolfl S, Johnston M, Two glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose sensors that generate a signal for induction of gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(22):12428–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.124288901598; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC38008.
29. Wohlbach DJ, Rovinskiy N, Lewis JA, Sardi M, Schackwitz WS, Martin JA, et al. Comparative genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural isolates for bioenergy production. Genome biology and evolution. 2014;6(9):2557–66. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu19925364804; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4202335.
30. McIlwain SJ, Peris D, Sardi M, Moskvin OV, Zhan F, Myers KS, et al. Genome Sequence and Analysis of a Stress-Tolerant, Wild-Derived Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Used in Biofuels Research. G3 (Bethesda). 2016;6(6):1757–66. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.02938927172212; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4889671.
31. Saito H, Posas F, Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics. 2012;192(2):289–318. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.14086323028184; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3454867.
32. Dutkiewicz R, Schilke B, Cheng S, Knieszner H, Craig EA, Marszalek J, Sequence-specific interaction between mitochondrial Fe-S scaffold protein Isu and Hsp70 Ssq1 is essential for their in vivo function. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279(28):29167–74. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M40294720015123690.
33. Lill R, Function and biogenesis of iron-sulphur proteins. Nature. 2009;460(7257):831–8. doi: 10.1038/nature0830119675643.
34. Schilke B, Voisine C, Beinert H, Craig E, Evidence for a conserved system for iron metabolism in the mitochondria of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(18):10206–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.1020610468587; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC17867.
35. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, et al. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature. 2013;500(7464):571–4. doi: 10.1038/nature1234423873039; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3758440.
36. Tanaka K, Nakafuku M, Satoh T, Marshall MS, Gibbs JB, Matsumoto K, et al. S. cerevisiae genes IRA1 and IRA2 encode proteins that may be functionally equivalent to mammalian ras GTPase activating protein. Cell. 1990;60(5):803–7. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90094-u2178777.
37. Luke MM, Della Seta F, Di Como CJ, Sugimoto H, Kobayashi R, Arndt KT, The SAP, a new family of proteins, associate and function positively with the SIT4 phosphatase. Molecular and cellular biology. 1996;16(6):2744–55. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.27448649382; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC231265.
38. Zabrocki P, Van Hoof C, Goris J, Thevelein JM, Winderickx J, Wera S, Protein phosphatase 2A on track for nutrient-induced signalling in yeast. Molecular microbiology. 2002;43(4):835–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02786.x11929536.
39. Harashima T, Anderson S, Yates JR, 3rdHeitman J, The kelch proteins Gpb1 and Gpb2 inhibit Ras activity via association with the yeast RasGAP neurofibromin homologs Ira1 and Ira2. Molecular cell. 2006;22(6):819–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.01116793550.
40. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998;14(2):115–32. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2–29483801.
41. Landi C, Paciello L, de Alteriis E, Brambilla L, Parascandola P, Effect of auxotrophies on yeast performance in aerated fed-batch reactor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;414(3):604–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.12921986533.
42. Eliasson A, Christensson C, Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Anaerobic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae carrying XYL1, XYL2, and XKS1 in mineral medium chemostat cultures. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2000;66(8):3381–6. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.8.3381-3386.200010919795; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC92159.
43. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Molecular biology of the cell. 2000;11(12):4241–57. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.424111102521; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC15070.
44. Brauer MJ, Huttenhower C, Airoldi EM, Rosenstein R, Matese JC, Gresham D, et al. Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19(1):352–67. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-077917959824; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2174172.
45. Brauer MJ, Saldanha AJ, Dolinski K, Botstein D, Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures. Molecular biology of the cell. 2005;16(5):2503–17. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-11-096815758028; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1087253.
46. Regenberg B, Grotkjaer T, Winther O, Fausboll A, Akesson M, Bro C, et al. Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 2006;7(11):R107. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-r10717105650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1794586.
47. Jin K, Musso G, Vlasblom J, Jessulat M, Deineko V, Negroni J, et al. Yeast mitochondrial protein-protein interactions reveal diverse complexes and disease-relevant functional relationships. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(2):1220–37. doi: 10.1021/pr501148q25546499.
48. Chasman D, Ho YH, Berry DB, Nemec CM, MacGilvray ME, Hose J, et al. Pathway connectivity and signaling coordination in the yeast stress-activated signaling network. Molecular systems biology. 2014;10:759. doi: 10.15252/msb.2014512025411400; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4299600.
49. Versele M, de Winde JH, Thevelein JM, A novel regulator of G protein signalling in yeast, Rgs2, downregulates glucose-activation of the cAMP pathway through direct inhibition of Gpa2. EMBO J. 1999;18(20):5577–91. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.557710523302; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1171626.
50. Geymonat M, Wang L, Garreau H, Jacquet M, Ssa1p chaperone interacts with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor of ras Cdc25p and controls the cAMP pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular microbiology. 1998;30(4):855–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01118.x10094633.
51. Hamacher T, Becker J, Gardonyi M, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Boles E, Characterization of the xylose-transporting properties of yeast hexose transporters and their influence on xylose utilization. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 9):2783–8. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-9-278312213924.
52. Aguilera J, Rodriguez-Vargas S, Prieto JA, The HOG MAP kinase pathway is required for the induction of methylglyoxal-responsive genes and determines methylglyoxal resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular microbiology. 2005;56(1):228–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04533.x15773992.
53. Tran UC, Clarke CF, Endogenous synthesis of coenzyme Q in eukaryotes. Mitochondrion. 2007;7 Suppl:S62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.03.00717482885; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1974887.
54. Fontanesi F, Soto IC, Barrientos A, Cytochrome c oxidase biogenesis: new levels of regulation. IUBMB Life. 2008;60(9):557–68. doi: 10.1002/iub.8618465791; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2630494.
55. Moreno-Cermeno A, Alsina D, Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J, Metabolic remodeling in frataxin-deficient yeast is mediated by Cth2 and Adr1. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1833(12):3326–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.09.01924100161.
56. Diderich JA, Schuurmans JM, Van Gaalen MC, Kruckeberg AL, Van Dam K, Functional analysis of the hexose transporter homologue HXT5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2001;18(16):1515–24. doi: 10.1002/yea.77911748728.
57. Rasmussen AK, Chatterjee A, Rasmussen LJ, Singh KK, Mitochondria-mediated nuclear mutator phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic acids research. 2003;31(14):3909–17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg44612853606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC165961.
58. Salusjarvi L, Kankainen M, Soliymani R, Pitkanen JP, Penttila M, Ruohonen L, Regulation of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbial cell factories. 2008;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-7-1818533012; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2435516.
59. Scalcinati G, Otero JM, Van Vleet JR, Jeffries TW, Olsson L, Nielsen J, Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient aerobic xylose consumption. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12(5):582–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00808.x22487265.
60. Alff-Tuomala S, Salusjarvi L, Barth D, Oja M, Penttila M, Pitkanen JP, et al. Xylose-induced dynamic effects on metabolism and gene expression in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-xylose cultures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(2):969–85. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7038-726454869.
61. Matsushika A, Goshima T, Hoshino T, Transcription analysis of recombinant industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals the molecular basis for fermentation of glucose and xylose. Microbial cell factories. 2014;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-1624467867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3917370.
62. Tamari Z, Rosin D, Voichek Y, Barkai N, Coordination of gene expression and growth-rate in natural populations of budding yeast. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e88801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.008880124533150; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3923061.
63. Fontanesi F, Mechanisms of mitochondrial translational regulation. IUBMB Life. 2013;65(5):397–408. doi: 10.1002/iub.115623554047.
64. Soto IC, Fontanesi F, Myers RS, Hamel P, Barrientos A, A heme-sensing mechanism in the translational regulation of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase biogenesis. Cell Metab. 2012;16(6):801–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.01823217259; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3523284.
65. Khalimonchuk O, Bestwick M, Meunier B, Watts TC, Winge DR, Formation of the redox cofactor centers during Cox1 maturation in yeast cytochrome oxidase. Molecular and cellular biology. 2010;30(4):1004–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00640-0919995914; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2815561.
66. Piao H, MacLean Freed J, Mayinger P, Metabolic activation of the HOG MAP kinase pathway by Snf1/AMPK regulates lipid signaling at the Golgi. Traffic. 2012;13(11):1522–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01406.x22882253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3465495.
67. Vallejo MC, Mayinger P, Delayed Turnover of Unphosphorylated Ssk1 during Carbon Stress Activates the Yeast Hog1 Map Kinase Pathway. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0137199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.013719926340004; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4560374.
68. Mizuno T, Masuda Y, Irie K, The Saccharomyces cerevisiae AMPK, Snf1, Negatively Regulates the Hog1 MAPK Pathway in ER Stress Response. PLoS genetics. 2015;11(9):e1005491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100549126394309; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4578879.
69. Kim S, Shah K, Dissecting yeast Hog1 MAP kinase pathway using a chemical genetic approach. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(6):1209–16. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.03217346711.
70. Santangelo GM, Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(1):253–82. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.70.1.253–282.200616524925; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1393250.
71. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G, Whole genome, whole population sequencing reveals that loss of signaling networks is the major adaptive strategy in a constant environment. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(11):e1003972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100397224278038; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3836717.
72. Lee SM, Jellison T, Alper HS, Systematic and evolutionary engineering of a xylose isomerase-based pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient conversion yields. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2014;7(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13068-014-0122-x25170344; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4147937.
73. Bamba T, Hasunuma T, Kondo A, Disruption of PHO13 improves ethanol production via the xylose isomerase pathway. AMB Express. 2016;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13568-015-0175-726769491; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4713403.
74. Almeida JR, Runquist D, Sanchez i Nogue V, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Stress-related challenges in pentose fermentation to ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol J. 2011;6(3):286–99. doi: 10.1002/biot.20100030121305697.
75. Piotrowski JS, Zhang Y, Bates DM, Keating DH, Sato TK, Ong IM, et al. Death by a thousand cuts: the challenges and diverse landscape of lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors. Frontiers in microbiology. 2014;5:90. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.0009024672514; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3954026.
76. Demeke MM, Dumortier F, Li Y, Broeckx T, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM, Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2013;6(1):120. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-12023971950; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3765968.
77. Koppram R, Albers E, Olsson L, Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2012;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-3222578262; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3408370.
78. Sherman F, Getting started with yeast. Methods in enzymology. 2002;350:3–41. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)50954-x12073320.
79. Entian KD, Kötter P, Stansfield I, Stark MJR, Yeast Genetic Strain and Plasmid Collections. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2007.
80. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH, A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic acids research. 1996;24(13):2519–24. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.13.25198692690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC145975.
81. Alexander WG, Peris D, Pfannenstiel BT, Opulente DA, Kuang M, Hittinger CT, Efficient engineering of marker-free synthetic allotetraploids of Saccharomyces. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;89:10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.11.00226555931; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4789119.
82. Parsons AB, Lopez A, Givoni IE, Williams DE, Gray CA, Porter J, et al. Exploring the mode-of-action of bioactive compounds by chemical-genetic profiling in yeast. Cell. 2006;126(3):611–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04016901791.
83. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nature protocols. 2007;2(1):31–4. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.1317401334.
84. Engel SR, Dietrich FS, Fisk DG, Binkley G, Balakrishnan R, Costanzo MC, et al. The reference genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: then and now. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4(3):389–98. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.00899524374639; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3962479.
85. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research. 2010;20(9):1297–303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.11020644199; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2928508.
86. Langmead B, Salzberg SL, Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.192322388286; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3322381.
87. Schwalbach MS, Keating DH, Tremaine M, Marner WD, Zhang Y, Bothfeld W, et al. Complex physiology and compound stress responses during fermentation of alkali-pretreated corn stover hydrolysate by an Escherichia coli ethanologen. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2012;78(9):3442–57. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07329-1122389370; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3346445.
88. Hebert AS, Richards AL, Bailey DJ, Ulbrich A, Coughlin EE, Westphall MS, et al. The one hour yeast proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(1):339–47. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.03476924143002; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3879625.
89. Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M, Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(9):2513–26. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.03159124942700; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4159666.
90. Cox J, Mann M, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(12):1367–72. doi: 10.1038/nbt.151119029910.
91. McIlwain SJ, Peris D, Sardi M, Moskvin OV, Zhan F, Myers K, et al. Genome Sequence and Analysis of a Stress-Tolerant, Wild-Derived Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae used in Biofuels Research. G3 (Bethesda). 2016. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.02938927172212.
92. Elias JE, Gygi SP, Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nature methods. 2007;4(3):207–14. doi: 10.1038/nmeth101917327847.
93. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp61619910308; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2796818.
94. Robinson MD, Grigull J, Mohammad N, Hughes TR, FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC bioinformatics. 2002;3:35. 12431279; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC139976.
95. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D, Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(25):14863–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.148639843981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC24541.