Comparative genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural isolates for bioenergy production

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2557-2566

  Wohlbach, Dana J ^a,c   Rovinskiy, Nikolay ^a   Lewis, Jeffrey A ^a,d   Sardi, Maria ^a   Schackwitz, Wendy S ^b   Martin, Joel A ^b   Deshpande, Shweta ^b   Daum, Christopher G ^b   Lipzen, Anna ^b   Sato, Trey K ^a   Gasch, Audrey P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DICKINSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Environmental stress; Genomics; Transcriptomics

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ENERGY METABOLISM; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84933059966     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu199     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aa E, et al. 2006. Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 6:702-715.
2. Akao T, et al. 2011. Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res. 18:423-434.
3. Almeida JR, et al. 2007. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 82:340.
4. Argueso JL, et al. 2009. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res. 19:2258-2270.
5. Babrzadeh F, et al. 2012. Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol Genet Genomics. 287:485-494.
6. Bennett AF, Lenski RE. 2007. An experimental test of evolutionary trade-offs during temperature adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:8649-8654.
7. Berry DB, Gasch AP. 2008. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 19:4580-4587.
8. Borneman AR, et al. 2011. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001287.
9. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:1185-1195.
10. Boyle EI, et al. 2004. GO::TermFinder-open source software for accessing gene ontology information and finding significantly enriched gene ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 20:3710-3715.
11. Brown CA, Murray AW, Verstrepen KJ. 2010. Rapid expansion and functional divergence of subtelomeric gene families in yeasts. Curr Biol. 20:895-903.
12. Bullard JH, Mostovoy Y, Dudoit S, Brem RB. 2010. Polygenic and directional regulatory evolution across pathways in Saccharomyces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:5058-5063.
13. Chang SL, Leu JY. 2011. A tradeoff drives the evolution of reduced metal resistance in natural populations of yeast. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002034.
14. Cherry JM, et al. 2012. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D700-D705.
15. Chundawat SP, et al. 2010. Multifaceted characterization of cell wall decomposition products formed during ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid based pretreatments. Bioresour Technol. 101:8429-8438.
16. Cromie GA, et al. 2013. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 3:2163-2171.
17. Doniger SW, et al. 2008. A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000183.
18. Dowell RD, et al. 2010. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328:469.
19. Dragosits M, Mattanovich D. 2013. Adaptive laboratory evolution-principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 12:64.
20. Dufour YS, et al. 2010. ChipD: a web tool to design oligonucleotide probes for high-density tiling arrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(Suppl), W321-W325.
21. Felsenstein J. 1989. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2) Cladistics 5:164.
22. Fraley C, Raftery AE, Murphy TB, Scrucca L. 2012. Mclust version 4 for R: normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Technical Report no. 597, Department of Statistics, University of Washington, June 2012.
23. Galeote V, et al. 2011. Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS One 6:e17872.
24. Gasch AP. 2002. Yeast genomic expression studies using DNA microarrays. Methods Enzymol. 350:393-414.
25. Gasch AP, et al. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 11:4241-4257.
26. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA. 2004. Affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20:307-315.
27. Gentleman RC, et al. 2004. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5:R80.
28. Giaever G, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
29. Gibney PA, et al. 2013. Yeast metabolic and signaling genes are required for heat-shock survival and have little overlap with the heat-induced genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:E4393-E4402.
30. Goffeau A, et al. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274:563-567.
31. Goodarzi H, et al. 2010. Regulatory and metabolic rewiring during laboratory evolution of ethanol tolerance in E. Coli. Mol Syst Biol. 6:378.
32. Goto K, et al. 1991. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the KHS killer gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Agric Biol Chem. 55:1953-1958.
33. Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29:644-652.
34. Gutierrez A, Beltran G, Warringer J, Guillamon JM. 2013. Genetic basis of variations in nitrogen source utilization in four wine commercial yeast strains. PLoS One 8:e67166.
35. Hall C, Dietrich FS. 2007. The reacquisition of biotin prototrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and gene clustering. Genetics 177:2293-2307.
36. Hirasawa T, et al. 2007. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J Biotechnol. 131:34-44.
37. Hittinger CT, et al. 2010. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464:54-58.
38. Hodgins-Davis A, Adomas AB, Warringer J, Townsend JP. 2012. Abundant gene-by-environment interactions in gene expression reaction norms to copper within Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol Evol. 4:1061-1079.
39. Hong KK, Nielsen J. 2013. Adaptively evolved yeast mutants on galactose show trade-offs in carbon utilization on glucose. Metab Eng. 16:78-86.
40. Jin M, et al. 2013. Phenotypic selection of a wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of AFEX pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels. 6:108.
41. Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB. 2008. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000304.
42. Kurtz S, et al. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12.
43. Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP. 2008. Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. Cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000223.
44. Lau MW, Gunawan C, Dale BE. 2009. The impacts of pretreatment on the fermentability of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: a comparative evaluation between ammonia fiber expansion and dilute acid pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2:30.
45. Lewis JA, et al. 2010. Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 186:1197-1205.
46. Lewis JA, Gasch AP. 2012. Natural variation in the yeast glucose-signaling network reveals a new role for the Mig3p transcription factor. G3 2:1607-1612.
47. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754-1760.
48. Liti G, et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458:337-341.
49. Liti G, Louis EJ. 2012. Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002912.
50. Magwene PM, et al. 2011. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:1987-1992.
51. Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL. 2004. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20:2878-2879.
52. McKenna A, et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20:1297-1303.
53. Ness F, Aigle M. 1995. RTM1: a member of a new family of telomeric repeated genes in yeast. Genetics 140:945-956.
54. Novo M, et al. 2009. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:16333-16338.
55. Opulente DA, Morales CM, Carey LB, Rest JS. 2013. Coevolution trumps pleiotropy: carbon assimilation traits are independent of metabolic network structure in budding yeast. PLoS One 8:e54403.
56. Parkhomchuk D, et al. 2009. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:e123.
57. Pollack JR, et al. 1999. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 23:41-46.
58. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
59. Robinson MD, Grigull J, Mohammad N, Hughes TR. 2002. FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC Bioinformatics 3:35-39.
60. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. EdgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139-140.
61. Saldanha AJ. 2004. Java Treeview-extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20:3246-3248.
62. Sato TK, et al. 2014. Harnessing genetic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation of xylose in hydrolysates of alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol. 80:540-554.
63. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L. 2009. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458:342-345.
64. Shimoi H, et al. 2002. The Awa1 gene is required for the foam-forming phenotype and cell surface hydrophobicity of sake yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 68:2018-2025.
65. Simpson JT, Durbin R. 2012. Efficient de novo assembly of large genomes using compressed data structures. Genome Res. 22:549-556.
66. Takagi H, et al. 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae sigma 1278b has novel genes of the N-acetyltransferase gene superfamily required for L-proline analogue resistance. J Bacteriol. 182:4249-4256.
67. Teixeira MC, et al. 2009. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:5761-5772.
68. Townsend J. 2003. Population genetic variation in genome-wide gene expression. Mol Biol Evol. 20:955-963.
69. Van Voorst F, et al. 2006. Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 23:351-359.
70. Wang D, et al. 2010. KaKs-Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gammaseries methods and sliding window strategies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 8:77-80.
71. Wang QM, et al. 2012. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol. 21:5404-5417.
72. Warringer J, et al. 2011. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002111.
73. Watanabe D, et al. 2011. Enhancement of the initial rate of ethanol fermentation due to dysfunction of yeast stress response components Msn2p and/or Msn4p. Appl Environ Microbiol. 77:934-941.
74. Wei W, et al. 2007. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:12825-12830.
75. Wenger JW, Schwartz K, Sherlock G. 2010. Bulk segregant analysis by high-throughput sequencing reveals a novel xylose utilization gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000942.
76. Will JL, et al. 2010. Incipient balancing selection through adaptive loss of aquaporins in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000893.
77. Yoshikawa K, et al. 2009. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:32-44.