Challenges and novel approaches for investigating molecular mediation

Human Molecular Genetics

Volumn 25, Issue R2, 2016, Pages R149-R156

  Richmond, R C ^a   Hemani, G ^a   Tilling, K ^a   Davey Smith, G ^a   Relton, C L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSALITY; DNA METHYLATION; GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; LUNG CANCER; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR MEDIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

EID: 84994115572     PISSN: 09646906     EISSN: 14602083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw197     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Vineis, P., van Veldhoven, K., Chadeau-Hyam, M. and Athersuch, T.J. (2013) Advancing the application of omicsbased biomarkers in environmental epidemiology. Environ Mol Mutagen., 54, 461-467.
2. Khoury, M.J. (2014) A primer series on-omic technologies for the practice of epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol., 180, 127-128.
3. Civelek, M. and Lusis, A.J. (2014) Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet., 15, 34-48.
4. Georgiadis, P., Hebels, D.G., Valavanis, I., Liampa, I., Bergdahl, I.A., Johansson, A., et al. (2016) Omics for prediction of environmental health effects: Blood leukocyte-based cross-omic profiling reliably predicts diseases associated with tobacco smoking. Scientific Reports, 6, 20544.
5. Davey Smith, G. and Hemani, G. (2014) Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum. Mol. Genet., 23(R1):R89-98.
6. Shin, S.Y., Petersen, A.K., Wahl, S., Zhai, G., Romisch-Margl, W., Small, K.S., et al. (2014) Interrogating causal pathways linking genetic variants, small molecule metabolites, and circulating lipids. Genome Med., 6, 25.
7. Schadt, E.E., Lamb, J., Yang, X., Zhu, J., Edwards, S., Guhathakurta, D., et al. (2005) An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat. Genet., 37, 710-717.
8. Preacher, K.J. (2015) Advances in Mediation Analysis: A Survey and Synthesis of New Developments. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 66, 825-852.
9. Davey Smith, G. (2016) A fatter, healthier but more unequal world. Lancet, 387, 1349-1350.
10. Varbo, A., Benn, M., Davey Smith, G., Timpson, N.J., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A. and Nordestgaard, B.G. (2015) Remnant Cholesterol, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Blood Pressure as Mediators From Obesity to Ischemic Heart Disease. Circ. Res., 116, 665-673.
11. Liu, Y., Aryee, M.J., Padyukov, L., Fallin, M.D., Hesselberg, E., Runarsson, A., et al. (2013) Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 142-147.
12. Kupers, L.K., Xu, X.L., Jankipersadsing, S.A., Vaez, A., la Bastidevan Gemert, S., Scholtens, S., et al. (2015) DNAmethylation mediates the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on birthweight of the offspring. Int. J. Epidemiol., 44, 1224-1237.
13. Kato, N., Loh, M., Takeuchi, F., Verweij, N., Wang, X., Zhang, W.H., et al. (2015) Trans-ancestry genome-wide association study identifies 12 genetic loci influencing blood pressure and implicates a role for DNA methylation. Nat. Genet., 47, 1282-1282.
14. Liang, L.M., Willis-Owen, S.A.G., Laprise, C., Wong, K.C.C., Davies, G.A., Hudson, T.J., et al. (2015) An epigenome-wide association study of total serum immunoglobulin E concentration. Nature, 520, 670-U188.
15. Fasanelli, F., Baglietto, L., Ponzi, E., Guida, F., Campanella, G., Johansson, M., et al. (2015) Hypomethylation of smokingrelated genes is associated with future lung cancer in four prospective cohorts. Nat. Commun, 6, 10192.
16. Hong, X.M., Hao, K., Ladd-Acosta, C., Hansen, K.D., Tsai, H.J., Liu, X., et al. (2015) Genome-wide association study identifies peanut allergy-specific loci and evidence of epigenetic mediation in US children. Nat. Commun, 6, 6304.
17. Assi, N., Fages, A., Vineis, P., Chadeau-Hyam, M., Stepien, M., Duarte-Salles, T., et al. (2015) A statistical framework to model the meeting-in-the-middle principle using metabolomic data: application to hepatocellular carcinoma in the EPIC study. Mutagenesis, 30, 743-753.
18. Bellavia, A., Urch, B., Speck, M., Brook, R.D., Scott, J.A., Albetti, B., et al. (2013) DNA Hypomethylation, Ambient Particulate Matter, and Increased Blood Pressure: Findings From Controlled Human Exposure Experiments. J. Am. Heart. Assoc., 2, e000212.
19. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) Themoderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc Psychol., 51, 1173-1182.
20. Hayes, A.F. (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun. Monogr., 76, 408-420.
21. Imai, K., Keele, L. and Tingley, D. (2010) A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychol. Methods, 15, 309-334.
22. VanderWeele, T.J., Valeri, L. and Ogburn, E.L. (2012) The Role of Measurement Error and Misclassification in Mediation Analysis Mediation and Measurement Error. Epidemiology, 23, 561-564.
23. le Cessie, S., Debeij, J., Rosendaal, F.R., Cannegieter, S.C. and Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2012) Quantification of Bias in Direct Effects Estimates Due to Different Types of Measurement Error in the Mediator. Epidemiology, 23, 551-560.
24. Blakely, T., McKenzie, S. and Carter, K. (2013) Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 67, 458-466.
25. Tchetgen-Tchetgen, E.J. and Lin, S.H. Robust estimation of pure/natural direct effects with mediator measurement error. Harvard Univ Biostat Work Pap 152. 2012;http://biostats. bepress.com/harvardbiostat/paper152.
26. VanderWeele, T.J. (2013) A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Epidemiology, 24, 224-232.
27. Zeilinger, S., Kuhnel, B., Klopp, N., Baurecht, H., Kleinschmidt, A., Gieger, C., et al. (2013) Tobacco smoking leads to extensive genome-wide changes in DNA methylation. Plos One, 8, e63812.
28. Philibert, R., Hollenbeck, N., Andersen, E., Osborn, T., Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F.X., et al. (2015) A quantitative epigenetic approach for the assessment of cigarette consumption. Front Psychol, 6, 656.
29. Millstein, J., Zhang, B., Zhu, J. and Schadt, E.E. (2009) Disentangling molecular relationships with a causal inference test. BMC Genet, 10, 23.
30. Chen, L.S., Emmert-Streib, F. and Storey, J.D. (2007) Harnessing naturally randomized transcription to infer regulatory relationships among genes. Genome Biol., 8, R219.
31. Millstein, J., Chen, G.K. and Breton, C.V. (2016) cit: hypothesis testing software for mediation analysis in genomic applications. Bioinformatics, pii: btw135.
32. Davey Smith, G. and Ebrahim, S. (2003) 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol., 32, 1-22.
33. Koestler, D.C., Chalise, P., Cicek, M.S., Cunningham, J.M., Armasu, S., Larson, M.C., et al. (2014) Integrative genomic analysis identifies epigenetic marks that mediate genetic risk for epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 74.
34. Sterne, J.A. and Davey Smith, G. (2001) Sifting the evidencewhat's wrong with significance tests? BMJ, 322, 226-231.
35. Khera, A.V., Won, H.H., Peloso, G.M., Lawson, K.S., Bartz, T.M., Deng, X., et al. (2016) Diagnostic yield of sequencing familial hypercholesterolemia genes in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 67(22):2578-2589.
36. The UK10K Consortium UK (2015) The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature, 526, 82-90.
37. Welsh, P., Polisecki, E., Robertson, M., Jahn, S., Buckley, B.M., de Craen, A.J.M., et al. (2010) Unraveling the Directional Link between Adiposity and Inflammation: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Approach. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab., 95, 93-99.
38. Timpson, N.J., Nordestgaard, B.G., Harbord, R.M., Zacho, J., Frayling, T.M., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A., et al. (2011) C-reactive protein levels and body mass index: elucidating direction of causation through reciprocal Mendelian randomization. Int. J. Obes., 35, 300-308.
39. Davey Smith, G. and Ebrahim, S. (2004) Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int. J. Epidemiol., 33, 30-42.
40. Didelez, V. and Sheehan, N. (2007) Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat. Methods Med. Res., 16, 309-330.
41. Lawlor, D.A., Harbord, R.M., Sterne, J.A., Timpson, N. and Davey Smith, G. (2008) Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat. Med., 27, 1133-1163.
42. Relton, C.L. and Davey Smith, G. (2010) Epigenetic epidemiology of common complex disease: prospects for prediction, prevention, and treatment. PLoS Med, 7, e1000356.
43. Relton, C.L. and Davey Smith, G. (2012) Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. Int. J. Epidemiol., 41, 161-176.
44. Kirkbride, J.B., Susser, E., Kundakovic, M., Kresovich, J.K., Davey Smith, G. and Relton, C.L. (2012) Prenatal nutrition, epigenetics and schizophrenia risk: can we test causal effects? Epigenomics, 4, 303-315.
45. Burgess, S., Daniel, R.M., Butterworth, A.S., Thompson, S.G. and Consortium, E.-I.A. (2015) Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways. Int. J. Epidemiol., 44, 484-495.
46. Zhou, X., Li, D.F., Zhang, B., Lowdon, R.F., Rockweiler, N.B., Sears, R.L., et al. (2015) Epigenomic annotation of genetic variants using the Roadmap Epigenome Browser. Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 345-346.
47. Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Hu, H., Bakshi, A., Robinson, M.R., Powell, J.E., et al. (2016) Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet., 48, 481-487.
48. Gusev, A., Ko, A., Shi, H., Bhatia, G., Chung, W., Penninx, B.W., et al. (2016) Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet., 48, 245-252.
49. Albert, F.W. and Kruglyak, L. (2015) The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 16, 197-212.
50. Pierce, B.L. and Burgess, S. (2013) Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable Estimators. Am. J. Epidemiol., 178, 1177-1184.
51. Haycock, P.C., Burgess, S., Wade, K.H., Bowden, J., Relton, C. and Davey Smith, G. (2016) Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 103, 965-978.
52. Brion, M.-J.A., Benyamin, B., Visscher, P.M. and Davey Smith, G. (2014) Beyond the single SNP: emerging developments in Mendelian randomization in the "Omics" era. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep., 1, 228-236.
53. Ala-Korpela, M., Kangas, A.J. and Soininen, P. (2012) Quantitative high-throughput metabolomics: a new era in epidemiology and genetics. Genome Med., 4, 36.
54. Kettunen, J., Tukiainen, T., Sarin, A.P., Ortega-Alonso, A., Tikkanen, E., Lyytikainen, L.P., et al. (2012) Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci influencing human serum metabolite levels. Nat. Genet., 44, 269-276.
55. Gaunt, T.R., Shihab, H.A., Hemani, G., Min, J.L., Woodward, G., Lyttleton, O., et al. (2016) Systematic identification of genetic influences on methylation across the human life course. Genome Biol., 17, 61.
56. Consortium, G.T. (2013) The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet., 45, 580-585.
57. Gruneberg, H. (1938) An analysis of the "pleiotropic" effects of a new lethal mutation in the rat (Mus norvegicus). Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B-Bio., 125, 123-144.
58. Hodgkin, J. (1998) Seven types of pleiotropy. Int. J. Dev. Biol., 42, 501-505.
59. Wagner, G.P. and Zhang, J.Z. (2011) The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat. Rev. Genet., 12, 204-213.
60. Solovieff, N., Cotsapas, C., Lee, P.H., Purcell, S.M. and Smoller, J.W. (2013) Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 483-495.
61. Ference, B.A., Yoo, W., Alesh, I., Mahajan, N., Mirowska, K.K., Mewada, A., et al. (2012) Effect of long-term exposure to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beginning early in life on the risk of coronary heart disease: A Mendelian randomization analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 60, 2631-2639.
62. Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G. and Burgess, S. (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol., 44, 512-525.
63. Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P.C. and Burgess, S. (2016) Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet. Epidemiol., 40, 304-314.
64. Burgess, S. and Thompson, S.G. (2015) Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.Am. J. Epidemiol., 181, 251-260.
65. Davey Smith, G. and Phillips, A.N. (1992) Confounding in epidemiological studies: why "independent" effects may not be all they seem. BMJ, 305, 757-759.
66. Steiger, J.H. (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull., 87, 245-251.
67. Wright, S. (1920) Correlation and causation Part I. Method of path coefficients. J. Agric. Res., 20, 0557-0585.
68. Kenny, D.A. (2008) Reflections on mediation. Organ. Res. Methods, 11, 353-358.
69. Lagani, V., Ball, G., Tegner, J. and Tsamardinos, I. Probabilistic computational causal discovery for systems biology In: Geris L, Gomez-Cabrero D, editors. Uncertainty in Biology, A Computational Modeling Approach. Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials. 17. New York City: Springer; 2015.
70. VanderWeele, T.J., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E.J., Cornelis, M. and Kraft, P. (2014) Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization. Epidemiology, 25, 427-435.
71. Pierce, B.L. and VanderWeele, T.J. (2012) The effect of nondifferential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol., 41, 1383-1393.