Evolution of heterogeneous genome differentiation across multiple contact zones in a crow species complex

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Vijay, Nagarjun ^a   Bossu, Christen M ^a,b   Poelstra, Jelmer W ^a   Weissensteiner, Matthias H ^a   Suh, Alexander ^a   Kryukov, Alexey P ^c   Wolf, Jochen B W ^a,d  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY AND SOIL SCIENCE   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOME; HETEROGENEITY; NATURAL SELECTION; PASSERINE; PLUMAGE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES COMPLEX;

EXPOSURE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; SPECIES; ANIMAL; CORVUS; FEMALE; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CROWS; FEMALE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME; GEOGRAPHY; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

EID: 84994061010     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13195     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Wolf, J. B. W., Lindell, J. & Backstrom, N. Speciation genetics: current status and evolving approaches. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 1717-1733 (2010).
2. Seehausen, O. et al. Genomics and the origin of species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 176-192 (2014).
3. Ellegren, H. et al. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491, 756-760 (2012).
4. Renaut, S. et al. Genomic islands of divergence are not affected by geography of speciation in sunflowers. Nat. Commun. 4, 1827 (2013).
5. Kronforst, M. R. et al. Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation. Cell Rep. 5, 666-677 (2013).
6. Wu, C. I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 851-865 (2001).
7. Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P. & Nosil, P. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28, 342-350 (2012).
8. Barton, N. & Bengtsson, B. O. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity 57, 357-376 (1986).
9. Noor, M. A. F. & Bennett, S. M. Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103, 439-444 (2009).
10. Nachman, M. W. & Payseur, B. A. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 409-421 (2012).
11. Cruickshank, T. E. & Hahn, M. W. Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3133-3157 (2014).
12. Smith, J. M. & Haigh, J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23, 23-35 (1974).
13. Gillespie, J. H. Genetic drift in an infinite population: The pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155, 909-919 (2000).
14. Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289-1303 (1993).
15. Cutter, A. D. & Payseur, B. A. Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 262-274 (2013).
16. Andrew, R. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. Divergence is focused on few genomic regions early in speciation: incipient speciation of sunflower ecotypes. Evolution 67, 2468-2482 (2013).
17. Poelstra, J. W. et al. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344, 1410-1414 (2014).
18. Foote, A. D. et al. Genome-culture coevolution promotes rapid divergence of killer whale ecotypes. Nat. Commun. 7, 1-12 (2016).
19. Burri, R. et al. Linked selection and recombination rate variation drive the evolution of the genomic landscape of differentiation across the speciation continuum of Ficedula flycatchers. Genome Res. 25, 1656-1665 (2015).
20. Jones, F. C. et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484, 55-61 (2012).
21. Roesti, M., Kueng, B., Moser, D. & Berner, D. The genomics of ecological vicariance in threespine stickleback fish. Nat. Commun. 6, 8767 (2015).
22. Meise, W. Die Verbreitung der Aaskrähe (Formenkreis Corvus corone L.). J. Für Ornithol. 76, 1-203 (1928).
23. Mayr, E. Systematics and the Origin of Species (Columbia University Press, 1942).
24. Londei, T. Alternation of clear-cut colour patterns in Corvus crow evolution accords with learning-dependent social selection against unusual-looking conspecifics. Ibis 155, 632-634 (2013).
25. Brodin, A. & Haas, F. Speciation by perception. Anim. Behav. 72, 139-146 (2006).
26. Poelstra, J. W., Vijay, N., Hoeppner, M. P. & Wolf, J. B. W. Transcriptomics of colour patterning and coloration shifts in crows. Mol. Ecol. 24, 4617-4628 (2015).
27. Hewitt, G. M. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907-913 (2000).
28. Serre, D., Nadon, R. & Hudson, T. J. Large-scale recombination rate patterns are conserved among human populations. Genome Res. 15, 1547-1552 (2005).
29. Corbett-Detig, R. B., Hartl, D. L. & Sackton, T. B. Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002112 (2015).
30. Roesti, M., Moser, D. & Berner, D. Recombination in the threespine stickleback genome-patterns and consequences. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3014-3027 (2013).
31. Kryukov, A. P. & Blinov, V. N. Hybrid zone of Hooded and Carrion Crows in Siberia. J. Ornithol. 135, 47 (1994).
32. Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 16, 113-148 (1985).
33. Mao, J. et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to axin and regulates the canonical wnt signaling pathway. Mol. Cell 7, 801-809 (2001).
34. Jani, R. A., Purushothaman, L. K., Rani, S., Bergam, P. & Setty, S. R. G. STX13 regulates cargo delivery from recycling endosomes during melanosome biogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 128, 3263-3276 (2015).
35. Stern, D. L. & Orgogozo, V. Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323, 746-751 (2009).
36. Nadeau, N. J. et al. Population genomics of parallel hybrid zones in the mimetic butterflies, H. melpomene and H. erato. Genome Res. 24, 1316-1333 (2014).
37. Soria-Carrasco, V. et al. Stick insect genomes reveal natural selection's role in parallel speciation. Science 344, 738-742 (2014).
38. Malinsky, M. et al. Genomic islands of speciation separate cichlid ecomorphs in an East African crater lake. Science 350, 1493-1498 (2015).
39. Rockman, M. V. The Qtn program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66, 1-17 (2012).
40. Pennisi, E. Disputed islands. Science 345, 611-613 (2014).
41. Skoglund, P. et al. Separating endogenous ancient DNA from modern day contamination in a Siberian Neandertal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2229-2234 (2014).
42. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
43. DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498 (2011).
44. Scheet, P. & Stephens, M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 629-644 (2006).
45. Bandelt, H.-J., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37-48 (1999).
46. Huson, D. H. SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics. 14, 68-73 (1998).
47. Pickrell, J. K. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002967 (2012).
48. Patterson, N., Price, A. L. & Reich, D. Population structure and Eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2, e190 (2006).
49. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655-1664 (2009).
50. Durand, E. Y., Patterson, N., Reich, D. & Slatkin, M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2239-2252 (2011).
51. Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 356 (2014).
52. Patterson, N. J. et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192, 1065-1093 (2012).
53. Schiffels, S. & Durbin, R. Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences. Nat. Genet. 46, 919-925 (2014).
54. Nielsen, R., Korneliussen, T., Albrechtsen, A., Li, Y. & Wang, J. SNP calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from new-generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7, e37558 (2012).
55. Korneliussen, T. S., Moltke, I., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. Calculation of Tajima's D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 289 (2013).
56. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156-2158 (2011).
57. Chan, A. H., Jenkins, P. A. & Song, Y. S. Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003090 (2012).
58. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559-575 (2007).
59. Singhal, S. et al. Stable recombination hotspots in birds. Science 350, 928-932 (2015).
60. Mugal, C. F., Arndt, P. F. & Ellegren, H. Twisted signatures of gc-biased gene conversion embedded in an evolutionary stable karyotype. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1700-1712 (2013).
61. Goudet, J. hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184-186 (2005).
62. Yi, X. et al. Sequencing of fifty human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science 329, 75-78 (2010).
63. Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia University Press, 1987).
64. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
65. Sabeti, P. C. et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 449, 913-918 (2007).
66. Sabeti, P. C. et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419, 832-837 (2002).
67. Ferrer-Admetlla, A., Liang, M., Korneliussen, T. & Nielsen, R. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1275-1291 (2014).
68. Szpiech, Z. A. & Hernandez, R. D. selscan: an efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2824-2827 (2014).
69. Lewontin, R. C. & Krakauer, J. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74, 175-195 (1973).
70. Zamani, N. et al. Unsupervised genome-wide recognition of local relationship patterns. BMC Genomics 14, 347 (2013).
71. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 (2010).
72. Tenenbaum, D. KEGGREST: Client-side REST access to KEGG. R Package Version 180 (2015).
73. Poelstra, J. W., Ellegren, H. & Wolf, J. B. W. An extensive candidate gene approach to speciation: diversity, divergence and linkage disequilibrium in candidate pigmentation genes across the European crow hybrid zone. Heredity 111, 467-473 (2013).