Effects that Facebook-based online peer assessment with micro-teaching videos can have on attitudes toward peer assessment and perceived learning from peer assessment

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 2295-2307

  Lin, Guan Yu ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Attitude toward peer assessment; Facebook; Online peer assessment; Perceived learning; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992554676     PISSN: 13058215     EISSN: 13058223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1280a     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Al-Barakat, A., & Al-Hassan, O. (2009). Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers' preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 399-413.
2. Brophy, J. (2004). Introduction. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. ix-xxiv). New York, NY: Elsevier.
3. Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 323-346.
4. Celik, I., Yurt, E., & Sahin, I. (2015). A model for understanding educational Facebook use. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 899-907.
5. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233-239.
6. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-355.
7. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
8. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed). Los Angeles: Sage.
9. Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers' development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 895-909.
10. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
11. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
12. Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted territory in a reading education classroom. Reading Today, 27(2), 34-34.
13. Horzum, M. B., Kaymak, Z. D., & Gungoren, O. C. (2015). Structural equation modeling towards online learning readiness, academic motivations, and perceived learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3), 759-770.
14. Joly, K. (2007). Facebook, MySpace, and Co.: IHEs ponder whether or not to embrace social networking websites. University Business, 10(4), 71-72.
15. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
16. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
17. Koc, C. (2011). The views of prospective class teachers about peer assessment in teaching practice. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 1979-1989.
18. Liang, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in college biology course. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 242-247.
19. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001a). Web based peer assessment: Attitude and achievement? IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(2), 13-13.
20. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001b). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
21. Napoles, J. (2008). Relationships among instructor, peer, and self-evaluations of undergraduate music education majors' micro-teaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 82-91.
22. New Media Consortium and EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2008). The horizon report: 2008 edition. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2008-Horizon-Report.pdf.
23. Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444.
24. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134-140.
25. Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
26. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 59-78.
27. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Moerkerke, G., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2001). Peer assessment in problem based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27(2), 153-173.
28. So, W. W., Pow, J. W., & Hung, V. H. (2009). The interactive use of a video database in teacher education: Creating a knowledge base for teaching through a learning community. Computers & Education, 53(3), 775-786.
29. Socialbakers (2015). Facebook statistics directory. Retrieved from http://www.socialbakers.com/statistics/facebook/
30. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107-125.
31. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
32. Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27.
33. Tsai, C. I. (2011). The effects of using web-based peer assessment in microteaching (Unpublished master's thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
34. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241-252.
35. Tseng, S. C. (2004). The instruction of high school computer science assisted by a networked peer assessment system: An analysis of the effects and peer feedback (Unpublished master's thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
36. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(2), 83-92.
37. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
38. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an in-service science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 55-67.
39. Wu, C. C., & Kao, H. C. (2008). Streaming videos in peer assessment to support training pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 45-55.
40. Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186-193.
41. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-462.