Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Human Communication Research

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 599-618

  Jeong, Se Hoon ^a   Hwang, Yoori ^b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Myong Ji University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Attitudinal Outcomes; Cognitive Outcomes; Meta Analysis; Multitasking; Persuasion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987752671     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12089     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Armstrong, G. B., & Chung, L. (2000). Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitate context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research, 27(3), 327–352.
2. Armstrong, G. B., & Greenberg, B. S. (1990). Background television as an inhibitor of cognitive processing. Human Communication Research, 16(3), 355–386.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Scott, D., Drynan, R., & Smith, J. C. (1969). Short-term memory and the limited capacity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 51–55.
4. Barden, J., & Petty, R. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 489–509.
5. Bowman, J. M., & Pace, R. C. (2014). Dual-tasking effects on outcomes of mobile communication technologies. Communication Research Reports, 31(2), 221–231.
6. Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931.
7. Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(9), 527–534.
8. Brown, L. A., de Bruin, N., Doan, J. B., Suchowersky, O., & Hu, B. (2009). Novel challenges to gait in Parkinson's disease: The effect of concurrent music in single-and dual-task contexts. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(9), 1578–1583.
9. Buller, D. B. (1986). Distraction during persuasive communication: A meta-analytic review. Communication Monographs, 53(2), 91–114.
10. Chowdhury, R. M., Finn, A., & Olsen, G. D. (2007). Investigating the simultaneous presentation of advertising and television programming. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 85–96.
11. Collins, R. L. (2008). Media multitasking: Issues posed in measuring the effects of television sexual content exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(1–2), 65–79.
12. Conard, M. A., & Marsh, R. F. (2014). Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment using simultaneous multitasking. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 112–117.
13. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis [Computer software]. (2008). Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
14. Duff, B. R. L., Yoon, G., Wang, Z. G., & Anghelcev, G. (2014). Doing it all: An exploratory study of predictors of media multitasking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(1), 11–23.
15. Eisenstadt, D., Leippe, M. R., Rivers, J. A., & Stambush, M. (2003). Counterattitudinal advocacy on a matter of prejudice: Effects of distraction, commitment, and personal importance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(10), 2123–2152.
16. Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2003). A “mix of attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395–410.
17. Fante, R., Jacobi, L. L., & Sexton, V. D. (2013). The effects of instant messaging and task difficulty on reading comprehension. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 287–298.
18. Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 336–343.
19. Gamble, K. R., Howard, J. H., Jr., & Howard, D. V. (2014). Does a simultaneous memory load affect older and younger adults' implicit associative learning? Aging. Neuropsychology & Cognition, 21(1), 52–67.
20. Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D. R., & Davis, J. M. (1993). Estimation of effect size from a series of experiments involving paired comparisons. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 18(3), 271–279.
21. Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2013). In search of the relationship between polychronicity and multitasking performance: The importance of trait self-control. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(4), 222–229.
22. Haslett, D. M. (1976). Distracting stimuli: Do they elicit or inhibit counterargumentation and attitude shift. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6(1), 81–94.
23. Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 46–64.
24. Hwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S.-H. (2014). Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548.
25. Insko, C. A., Turnbull, W., & Yandell, B. (1974). Facilitative and inhibiting effects of distraction on attitude change. Sociometry, 37(4), 508–528.
26. Jeong, S.-H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364–384.
27. Jeong, S.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 571–587.
28. Jeong, S. -H., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Multitasking and persuasion: The role of structural interference. Media Psychology, 18(4), 451–474.
29. Jeong, S.-H., Hwang, Y., & Fishbein, M. (2010). Effects of exposure to sexual content in the media on adolescent sexual behaviors: The moderating role of multitasking with media. Media Psychology, 13(3), 222–242.
30. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Keating, J. P., & Brock, T. C. (1974). Acceptance of persuasion and the inhibition of counterargumentation under various distraction tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(4), 301–309.
32. Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S57–S80.
33. Lang, A., & Chrzan, J. (2015). Media multitasking: Good, bad, or ugly? Communication Yearbook, 39(1), 99–128.
34. Lawson, D. R. (2013). The effects of text messaging on memory recall in college students (Unpublished thesis). Western Carolina University.
35. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. McGuire, W. J. (1972). Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37. Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99–105.
38. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125.
39. Papper, R. A., Holmes, M. E., & Popovich, M. N. (2004). Middletown media studies: Media multitasking and how much people really use the media. The International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal, 1(1), 3–56.
40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
41. Pool, M. M., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (2003). The impact of background radio and television on high school students' homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53(1), 74–87.
42. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press/CSLI.
43. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (2000). Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43, 65–70.
44. Ross, L. M., Register-Mihalik, J. K., Mihalik, J. P., McCulloch, K. L., Prentice, W. E., Shields, E. W., & Guskiewicz, K. M. (2011). Effects of a single-task versus a dual-task paradigm on cognition and balance in healthy subjects. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 20(3), 296.
45. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, England: Wiley.
46. Shamo, G. W., & Meador, L. M. (1969). The effect of visual distraction upon recall and attitude change. Journal of Communication, 19(2), 157–162.
47. Shapiro, M. A., & Kim, H. (2012). Realism judgments and mental resources: A cue processing model of media narrative realism. Media Psychology, 15(1), 93–119.
48. Srivastava, J. (2013). Media multitasking performance: Role of message relevance and formatting cues in online environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 888–895.
49. Tran, P., Carrillo, R., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2013). Effects of online multitasking on reading comprehension of expository text. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(3), 1–17.
50. van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109.
51. Vandierendonck, A., De Vooght, G., & Van Der Goten, K. (1998). Interfering with the central executive by means of a random interval repetition task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51(1), 197–218.
52. Voorveld, H. A. (2011). Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2200–2206.
53. Voorveld, H. A., & van der Goot, M. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(3), 392–408.
54. Wang, Z., David, P., Srivastava, J., Powers, S., Brady, C., D'Angelo, J., & Moreland, J. (2012). Behavioral performance and visual attention in communication multitasking: A comparison between instant messaging and online voice chat. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 968–975.
55. Wang, Z., Irwin, M., Cooper, C., & Srivastava, J. (2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 102–127.
56. Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513.
57. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177.
58. Wu, C., Zhao, G., Lin, B., & Lee, J. (2013). Navigating a car in an unfamiliar country using an internet map: Effects of street language formats, map orientation consistency, and gender on driver performance, workload and multitasking strategy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(5), 425–437.
59. Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J. J., & Reeves, B. (2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 167–192.
60. Yoon, S., Choi, Y., & Song, S. (2011). When intrusive can be likable: Product placement effects on multitasking consumers. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 63–75.
61. Zhang, W., Jeong, S.-H., & Fishbein, M. (2010). Situational factors competing for attention: The interaction effect of multitasking and sexually explicit content on TV recognition. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 2–13.
62. Zigmond, D., & Stipp, H. (2010). Assessing a new advertising effect. Measurement of the impact of television commercials on Internet search queries. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(2), 162–168.
63. Zimbardo, P., Snyder, M., Thomas, J., Gold, A., & Gurwitz, S. (1970). Modifying the impact of persuasive communications with external distraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(4), 669–680.