Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 527-534

  Brasel, S Adam ^a   Gips, James ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPUTER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEVISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEVISION;

EID: 80054831065     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0350     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. The Nielsen Company. Television, Internet and mobile usage in the US. Three Screen Report 2010; 8. www.tvb.org/ pdf/multiplatform/Nielsen-Three- Screen-Report-Q12010 pdf (accessed Aug. 1, 2010).
2. Roberts D, Foehr U, Rideout V, et al. (2004) Kids and media in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Armbruster A. TV central in mixology of multimedia: Medium generates most consumer response, triggers online search. Television Week 2008. www.tvweek.com (accessed Aug. 1, 2010).
4. Council for Research Excellence, Ball State Center for Media Design. (2009) Video consumer mapping study. www researchexcellence.com/vcmstudy.php (accessed Aug. 1, 2010).
5. Jäckel M, Wollscheid S. More and more and more-and all at the same time: Main and secondary activities of TV audiences. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie 2007; 19:23-33.
6. Pilotta JJ, Schultz DE. Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. Journal of Advertising Research 2005; 45:19-26. (Pubitemid 43388747)
7. Pilotta JJ, Schultz DE, Drenik G, et al. Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning. Journal of Consumer Behavior 2004; 3:285-292.
8. McDonald DG, Meng J. (2009) The multitasking of entertainment. In Kleinman S, ed. The culture of efficiency: Technology in everyday life. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 142-157.
9. D'Alessio D, Allen M. (2007) The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processes. In Preiss RW, et al., eds. Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 103-118.
10. Hawkins R, Pingree S, Bruce L, et al. Strategy and style in attention to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1997; 41:245-264.
11. Hawkins R, Pingree S, Hitchon J, et al. What produces television attention and attention style? genre, situation, andindividual differences as predictors. Human Communications Research 2005; 31:162-167.
12. Reeves B, Lang A, Kim EY, et al. The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology 1999; 1:49-67.
13. Belopolsky AV, Kramer AF, Theeuwes J. The role of awareness in processing of oculomotor capture: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008; 20:2285-2297.
14. Van der Stigchel S, Belopolsky AV, Peters JC, et al. The limits of top-down control of visual attention. Acta Psychologica 2009; 132:201-212.
15. Saling L, Phillips J. Automaticity: Efficient not mindless. Brain Research Bulletin 73, 1-20.
16. Larose R. (2009) Media habits. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
17. Papper RA, Holmes ME, Popovich MN. Middletown media studies: Media multitasking⋯and how much people really use the media. The International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal 2004; 1:5-50.
18. Ophir E, Nass CI, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009; 106:15583-15587.
19. Zhang Y, Goonetilleke R, Plocher T, et al. Time related behavior in multitasking situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2005; 62:425-455. (Pubitemid 40556685)
20. Ishizaka K, Marshall S, Conte J. Individual differences in attentional strategies in multitasking situations. Human Performance 2001; 14:339-358.
21. Sarter M, Lustig C. (2009) Attention and learning and memory. In Squire LR, ed. New encyclopedia of neuroscience. Oxford: Elsevier.
22. Jeong S, Fishbein M. Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology 2007; 10:364-384.
23. Rohm A, Sultan F, Bardhi F. The multitasking paradox: Media consumption among young consumers. Marketing Management 2009; December: 20-25.
24. European Interactive Advertising Association. (2009) EIAA media multi-tasking report. www.eiaa.co.uk (accessed Aug. 1, 2010).
25. Levine LE, Waite BM, Bowman LL. Electronic media use, reading and academic distractibility in college youth. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:560-566. (Pubitemid 47328670)
26. Carrier LM, Cheever NA, Rosen LR, et al. Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:483-489.
27. Waller MJ. (2007) Preferences, behaviors, and strategies in multiple task performance. In Dansereau F, Yammarino FJ, eds. Multi-level issues in organizations and time. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 239-248.
28. Bortner RW. A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern A behavior. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1969; 22:87-91.
29. Lindquist JD. The polychronic-monochronic tendency model. Time & Society 2007; 16:253-285.
30. Burns JL, Anderson DR. Attentional intertia and recognition memory in adult television viewers. Communication Research 1993; 20:777-799.
31. Hess M, Madansky M, eds. (2005) Media meshing. In Truly, madly, deeply engaged, pp. 20-23. us.yimg.com/i/adv/ tmde-05/truly-madly-final-booklet.pdf (accessed Aug. 1, 2010).
32. Stewart DW, Pavlou PA. From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2002; 30: 376-396. (Pubitemid 40815800)
33. Fox AB, Rosen J, Crawford M. Distractions, distractions: Does instant messenging affect college student's performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:51-53.