The early emergence and puzzling decline of relational reasoning: Effects of knowledge and search on inferring abstract concepts

Cognition

Volumn 156, Issue , 2016, Pages 30-40

  Walker, Caren M ^a   Bridgers, Sophie ^b   Gopnik, Alison ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Causal learning; Cognitive development; Explanation; Relational reasoning

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT RELATIONAL REASONING; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INFANT; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; INFANT; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGY, CHILD;

EID: 84984813432     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Barnett, S.M., Ceci, S.J., When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 2002, 612.
2. Bonawitz, E., Denison, S., Griffiths, T., Gopnik, A., Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, response variability: Sampling in cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18:10 (2014), 497–500.
3. Bonawitz, E.B., Lombrozo, T., Occam's rattle: Children's use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology 48:4 (2012), 1156–1164.
4. Bonawitz, E.B., van Schijndel, T.J., Friel, D., Schulz, L., Children balance theories and evidence in exploration, explanation, and learning. Cognitive Psychology 64:4 (2012), 215–234.
5. Catrambone, R., Holyoak, K.J., Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:6 (1989), 1147–1156.
6. Christie, S., Gentner, D., Relational similarity in identity relation: The role of language. Vosniadou, S., Kayser, D., (eds.) Proceedings of the second European cognitive science conference, 2007, Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
7. Christie, S., Gentner, D., Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Cognitive Development 11:3 (2010), 356–373.
8. Christie, S., Gentner, D., Language helps children succeed on a classic analogy task. Cognitive Science 38:2 (2014), 383–397.
9. Christie, S., Gentner, D., Vosniadou, S., Kayser, D., Relational similarity in identity relation: The role of language. Vosniadou, S., Kayser, D., (eds.) Proceedings of the second European cognitive science conference, 2007, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
10. Defeyter, M.A., German, T., Acquiring an understanding of design: Evidence from children's insight problem solving. Cognition 89:2 (2003), 133–155.
11. Denison, S., Bonawitz, E., Gopnik, A., Griffiths, T.L., Rational variability in children's causal inferences: The sampling hypothesis. Cognition 126 (2013), 285–300.
12. Dewar, K.M., Xu, F., Induction, overhypotheses, and the origins of abstract knowledge: Evidence from 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science 21:12 (2010), 1871–1877.
13. Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Lombrozo, T., & Gentner, D. (2016). Explanation recruits comparison: Insights from a category-learning task (submitted for publication).
14. Fagot, J., Wasserman, E.A., Young, M.E., Discriminating the relation between relations: The role of entropy in abstract conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens). Experimental Psychology of Animal Behavioral Process 27:4 (2001), 316–328.
15. Ferry, A., Hespos, S., Gentner, D., Prelinguistic relational concepts: Investigating analogical processing in infants. Child Development 86:5 (2015), 1386–1405.
16. Frazier, B.N., Gelman, S.A., Wellman, H.M., Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development 80 (2009), 1592–1611.
17. Gelman, S.A., The essential child: The origins of essentialism in everyday thought. 2003, Oxford Press, Oxford.
18. Gelman, S.A., Gottfried, G.M., Children's causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion. Child Development 67:5 (1996), 1970–1987.
19. Gentner, D., Analogy. Bechtel, W., Graham, G.A., (eds.) Companion to cognitive science, 1998, Blackwell, Oxford, 107–113.
20. Gentner, D., Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development 59 (1988), 47–59.
21. Gentner, D., Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science 34:5 (2010), 752–775.
22. Gentner, D., Anggoro, F.K., Klibanoff, R.S., Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child Development 82:4 (2011), 1173–1188.
23. Gentner, D., Medina, J., Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition 65 (1998), 263–297, 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00002-x.
24. Gentner, D., Namy, L., Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development 14 (1999), 487–513, 10.1016/s0885-2014(99)00016-7.
25. Gentner, D., Rattermann, M.J., Language and the career of similarity. Gelman, S.A., Byrnes, J.P., (eds.) Perspectives on thought and language: Interrelations in development, 1991, Cambridge University Press, London.
26. Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J., Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12:3 (1980), 306–355.
27. Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J., Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15:1 (1983), 1–38.
28. Goodman, N., Fact, fiction, and forecast. 1955, Hackett Publishing Co., Indiana.
29. Goodman, N., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J.B., Learning a theory of causality. Psychological Review 118:1 (2011), 110–119.
30. Gopnik, A., Griffiths, T.L., Lucas, C.G., When younger learners can be better (or at least more open-minded) than older ones. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24 (2015), 87–92.
31. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D., Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development 71 (2000), 1205–1222.
32. Gopnik, A., Wellman, H.M., Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin 138:6 (2012), 1085–1108.
33. Griffiths, T.L., Tenenbaum, J.B., Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116(4), 2009, 661.
34. Halford, G.S., Analogical reasoning and conceptual complexity in cognitive development. Human Development 35:4 (1992), 193–217.
35. Hochmann, J.R., Mody, S., Carey, S., Infants’ representations of same and different in match- and non-match-to-sample. Cognitive Psychology 86 (2016), 87–111.
36. Hood, B., Cole-Davies, V., Dias, M., Looking and search measures of object knowledge in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 2003, 61.
37. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Inhelder, B., If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition 3:3 (1974–1975), 195–212.
38. Keil, F.C., Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Kemp, C., Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J.B., Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science 10:3 (2007), 307–321.
40. Kirkham, N.Z., Cruess, L., Diamond, A., Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task. Developmental Science 6:5 (2003), 449–467.
41. Kotovsky, L., Gentner, D., Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development 67:6 (1996), 2797–2822.
42. Kuhl, P.K., Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:11 (2004), 831–843.
43. Legare, C.H., Lombrozo, T., Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood. Experimental Child Psychology 126 (2014), 198–212.
44. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Reasoning about structure and function: Children's conception of gears. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35:1 (1998), 3–25.
45. Loewenstein, J., Gentner, D., Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 50:4 (2005), 315–353.
46. Lombrozo, T., Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology 55 (2007), 232–257.
47. Lombrozo, T., Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology 61 (2010), 303–332.
48. Lombrozo, T., Explanation and abductive inference. Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G., (eds.) Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning, 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 260–276.
49. Lombrozo, T., and Vasilyeva, N. (in press). Causal explanation. In M. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford handbook of causal reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50. Lucas, C.G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T.L., Gopnik, A., When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition 131:2 (2014), 284–299.
51. Mansinghka, V.K., Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J., Griffiths, T.L., Structured priors for structure learning. Proceedings of the twenty-second conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI), 2006.
52. Markman, A.B., Gentner, D., Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25:4 (1993), 431–467.
53. Mix, K.S., Children's equivalence judgments: Crossmapping effects. Cognitive Development 23 (2008), 191–203, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.03.001.
54. Namy, L.L., Gentner, D., Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: Young children's use of comparison in category learning. Experimental Psychology: General 131:1 (2002), 5–15.
55. Needham, D.R., Begg, I.M., Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training. Memory & Cognition 19:6 (1991), 543–557.
56. Pearl, J., Causality. 2000, Cambridge University Press, London.
57. Penn, D.C., Holyoak, K.J., Povinelli, D.J., Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral Brain Science 31:2 (2008), 109–130.
58. Premack, D., The codes of man and beasts. Behavioral Brain Science 6:1 (1983), 125–136.
59. Rattermann, M.J., Gentner, D., The effect of language on similarity: The use of relational labels improves young children's performance in a mapping task. Holyoak, K., Gentner, D., Kokinov, B., (eds.) Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory & data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences, 1998, New Bulgarian University, Sophia, 274–282.
60. Richland, L.E., Morrison, R.G., Holyoak, K.J., Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Experimental Child Psychology 94:3 (2006), 249–273.
61. Rozenblit, L.R., Keil, F.C., The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science 26 (2002), 521–562.
62. Sanborn, A.N., Griffiths, T.L., Navarro, D.J., Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117(4), 2010, 1144.
63. Schulz, L.E., Goodman, N.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., Jenkins, A.C., Going beyond the evidence: Abstract laws and preschoolers’ responses to anomalous data. Cognition 109:2 (2008), 211–223.
64. Seiver, E., Gopnik, A., Goodman, N.D., Did she jump because she was the big sister or because the trampoline was safe? Causal inference and the development of social attribution. Child Development 84:2 (2013), 443–454.
65. Smith, L.B., Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. Child Development 55 (1984), 363–380, 10.2307/1129949.
66. Son, J.Y., Doumas, L.A.A., Goldstone, R.L., Relational words as handles: They bring along baggage. Problem Solving 3:1 (2010), 52–92.
67. Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L., Kemp, C., Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:7 (2006), 309–318.
68. Tenenbaum, J.B., Niyogi, S., Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2003.
69. Thibaut, J.P., French, R., Vezneva, M., The development of analogy making in children: Cognitive load and executive functions. Experimental Child Psychology 106:1 (2010), 1–19.
70. Thompson, R.K.R., Oden, D.L., Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: The paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cognitive Science 24:3 (2000), 363–396.
71. Thompson, R.K., Oden, D.L., Boysen, S.T., Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Process 23:1 (1997), 31–43.
72. Tyrrell, D.J., Stauffer, L.B., Snowman, L.G., Perception of abstract identity/difference relationships by infants. Infant Behavior Development 14:1 (1991), 125–129.
73. Ullman, T.D., Goodman, N.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., Theory learning as a stochastic search in a language of thought. Cognitive Development 27:4 (2012), 455–480.
74. Vendetti, M.S., Wu, A., Holyoak, K.J., Far-out thinking generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science 25:4 (2014), 928–933.
75. Walker, C.M., Bonawitz, E., Lombrozo, T. (submitted for publication). Explaining promotes a preference for simpler hypotheses in young children.
76. Walker, C.M., Gopnik, A., Toddlers infer higher-order relational principles in causal learning. Psychological Science 25:1 (2014), 161–169.
77. Walker, C.M., Lombrozo, T., Legare, C.H., Gopnik, A., Explanation prompts children to privilege inductively rich properties. Cognition 133:2 (2014), 343–357.
78. Walker, C.M., Lombrozo, T., Williams, J.J., Rafferty, A., Gopnik, A., Explaining constrains causal learning in childhood. Child Development, 2016, 10.1111/cdev.12590.
79. Wasserman, E.A., Fagot, F., Young, M.E., Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): The role of entropy. Computational Psychology 115:1 (2001), 42–52.
80. Wasserman, E.A., Young, M.E., Same-different discrimination: The keel and backbone of thought and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology & Animal Behavioral Processes 36 (2010), 3–22.
81. Werker, J.F., Yeung, H.H., Yoshida, K., How do infants become experts at native speech perception?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21:4 (2012), 221–226.
82. Wilkenfeld, D., Lombrozo, T.L., Inference to the best explanation (IBE) versus explanation to the best inference (EBI). Science and Education 10 (2015), 1–19, 10.1007/s11191-015-9784-4.
83. Williams, J.J., Lombrozo, T., The role of explanation in discovery and generalization: Evidence from category learning. Cognitive Science 34 (2010), 776–806, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01113.x.
84. Williams, J.J., Lombrozo, T., Explanation and prior knowledge interact to guide learning. Cognitive Psychology 66:1 (2013), 55–84.
85. Woodward, J., Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. 2003, University Press, Oxford.
86. Zelazo, P.D., Frye, D., Rapus, T., An age related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development 11 (1996), 37–63.
87. Zentall, T.R., Wassermann, E.A., Lazareva, O.F., Thompson, R.K.R., Rattermann, M.J., Concept learning in animals. Computational Cognition & Behavior Review 3 (2008), 13–45.