When Younger Learners Can Be Better (or at Least More Open-Minded) Than Older Ones

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 87-92

  Gopnik, Alison ^a   Griffiths, Thomas L ^a   Lucas, Christopher G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian models; causal learning; cognitive development; simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926500460     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721414556653     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. GopnikA. (2012). (See References). An accessible short review of recent work on probabilistic models of cognitive development.
2. GopnikA.WellmanH. M. (2012). (See References). An extensive, thorough, accessible review of the theoretical and empirical work on Bayesian causal models as a constructivist account of cognitive development, which includes a gentle nontechnical instructional tutorial explaining how the models actually work and discussion of the idea of search and developmental change.
3. Kushnir T.Xu F., ed. 2012:
4. LucasC. G.BridgersS.GriffithsT. L.GopnikA. (2014). (See References). The source of much of the empirical work described here, including several more experiments and an explanation and formal model relevant to the annealing ideas.
5. TenenbaumJ. B.KempC.GriffithsT. L.GoodmanN. D. (2011). (See References). A general and accessible review of probabilistic models and Bayesian inference in cognitive science.
6. Bonawitz E.,Denison S.,Griffiths T.,Gopnik A.Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, response variability: Sampling in cognitive development.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2014;:
7. Buchsbaum D.,Bridgers S.,Weisberg D. S.,Gopnik A.The power of possibility: Causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:2202-2212
8. Cheng P.From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review. 1997;104:367-405
9. Chrysikou E. G.,Hamilton R.,Coslett H.,Datta A.,Bikson M.,Thompson-Schill S.Noninvasive transcranial direct stimulation over left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use.Cognitive Neuroscience. 2013;4:81-89
10. Defeyter M. A.,German T.Acquiring an understanding of design: Evidence from children’s insight problem solving.Cognition. 2003;89:133-155
11. Denison S.,Bonawitz E.,Gopnik A.,Griffiths T. L.Rational variability in children’s causal inferences: The Sampling Hypothesis.Cognition. 2013;126:285-300
12. Gentner D.Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Science. 2010;34:752-775
13. Gopnik A.Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications.Science. 2012;337:1623-1627
14. Gopnik A.,Glymour C.,Sobel D. M.,Schulz L. E.,Kushnir T.,Danks D.A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets.Psychological Review. 2004;111:3-32
15. Gopnik A.,Meltzoff A. N.Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997:
16. Gopnik A.,Schulz L.Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:
17. Gopnik A.,Tenenbaum J. B.Bayesian networks, Bayesian learning and cognitive development.Developmental Science. 2007;10:281-287
18. Gopnik A.,Wellman H. M.Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory.Psychological Bulletin. 2012;138:1085-1108
19. Griffiths T. L.,Tenenbaum J. B.Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. Gopnik A.Schulz L., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2007:
20. Gweon H.,Schulz L.16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions.Science. 2011;332:1524
21. Kelley H. H.Nebraska symposium on motivation. Levine D., ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1967:192-238.
22. Kemp C.,Perfors A.,Tenenbaum J.Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models.Developmental Science. 2007;10:307-321
23. Kirkpatrick S.,Gelatt C. D.,Vecchi M. P.Optimization by simulated annealing.Science. 1983;220:671-680
24. Kuhl P. K.Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5:831-843
25. Rational constructivism in cognitive development. Kushnir T.Xu F., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2012:
26. Lucas C. G.,Bridgers S.,Griffiths T. L.,Gopnik A.When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships.Cognition. 2014;131:284-299
27. Penn D. C.,Holyoak K. J.,Povinelli D. J.Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 2008;31:109-130
28. Seiver E.,Gopnik A.,Goodman N. D.Did she jump because she was the big sister or because the trampoline was safe? Causal inference and the development of social attribution.Child Development. 2013;84:443-454
29. Tenenbaum J. B.,Kemp C.,Griffiths T. L.,Goodman N. D.How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction.Science. 2011;331:1279-1285
30. Thompson-Schill S. L.,Ramscar M.,Chrysikou E. G.Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009;18:259-263
31. Walker C. M.,Gopnik A..Paper presented at the Cognitive Development Society Meeting; 2013Memphis, TN; 2013.
32. Walker C. M.,Gopnik A.Toddlers infer higher-order relational principles in causal learning.Psychological Science. 2014;25:161-169
33. Wellman H. M.,Gelman S. A.Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains.Annual Review of Psychology. 1992;43:337-375
34. Werker J. F.,Yeung H. H.,Yoshida K.How do infants become experts at native speech perception?.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012;21:221-226