The role of explanation in discovery and generalization: Evidence from category learning

Cognitive Science

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 776-806

  Williams, Joseph J ^a   Lombrozo, Tania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomalies; Category learning; Explanation; Generalization; Learning; Self explanation; Transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955778577     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01113.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ahn W, Brewer W F, Mooney R J. Schema acquisition from a single example. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1992, 18(2):391-412.
2. Ahn W, Marsh J, Luhmann C, Lee K. Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:107-118.
3. Allen S W, Brooks L R. Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1991, 120(1):3-19.
4. Amsterlaw J, Wellman H. Theories of mind in transition: A microgenetic study of the development of false belief understanding. Journal of Cognition and Development 2006, 7:139-172.
5. Ashby F G, Maddox W T. Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 56:149-178.
6. Bruner J S, Goodnow J J, Austin G A. A study of thinking 1956, New York, Wiley
7. Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood 1985, Cambridge, MA, Bradford Books, MIT Press
8. Carey S. Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? The epigenesis of mind: Essays in biology and cognition 1991, 257-291. Carey SGelman R. Eds, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
9. Carroll J W. Laws of nature. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (fall 2008 edition) 2008, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/laws-of-nature/, Zalta E N. Ed, Available at:
10. Chi M T H. Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. Advances in instructional psychology 2000, 161-238. Glaser R. Ed, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
11. Chi M T H, Bassok M, Lewis M, Reimann P, Glaser R. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 1989, 13:145-182.
12. Chi M T H, de Leeuw N, Chiu M H, LaVancher C. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 1994, 18:439-477.
13. Chinn C A, Brewer W F. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research 1993, 63:1-49.
14. Chin-Parker S, Hernandez O, Matens M. Explanation in category learning. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2006, 1098-1103. Sun R, Miyake N, Eds, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
15. Craik F I M, Lockhart R S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11(6):671-684.
16. Crowley K, Siegler R S. Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning. Child Development 1999, 70:304-316.
17. DeJong G, Mooney R. Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning 1986, 1(2):145-176.
18. Friedman M. Explanation and scientific understanding. Journal of Philosophy 1974, 71:5-19.
19. Goodman N, Tenenbaum J, Feldman J, Griffiths T. A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science 2008, 32(1):108-154.
20. Hamilton D. Illusory correlation as a basis for stereotyping. Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior 1981, 115-144. Hamilton D. Ed, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
21. Hampton J A. Concepts as prototypes. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 2006, 79-113. Vol. 46, San Diego, CA, Academic Press
22. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations 1958, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
23. Kalish C W. Gold, Jade, and Emeruby: The value of naturalness for theories of concepts and categories. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 2002, 22:45-56.
24. Keil F C. Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:227-254.
25. Kelemen D. Functions, goals and intentions: Children's teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 12:461-468.
26. Kitcher P. Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 1981, 48:507-531.
27. Kitcher P. Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Volume XIII: Scientific explanation 1989, 410-505. Kitcher PSalmon W. Eds, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press
28. Koehler D J. Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 110:499-519.
29. Kuhn D, Katz J. Are self-explanations always beneficial? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 103(3):386-394.
30. Lee M D, Vanpaemel W. Exemplars, prototypes, similarities, and rules in category representation: An example of hierarchical Bayesian analysis. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2008, 32(8):1403-1424.
31. Legare C H, Gelman S A, Wellman H M. Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children's causal explanatory reasoning. Child Development
32. Legare C H, Wellman H M, Gelman S A. Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58(2):177-194.
33. Lewis C. Why and how to learn why: Analysis-based generalization of procedures. Cognitive Science 1988, 12:211-256.
34. Lombrozo T. The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:464-470.
35. Lombrozo T. Explanation and categorization: How "why?" informs "what?" Cognition 2009, 110:248-253.
36. Lombrozo T, Carey S. Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition 2006, 99:167-204.
37. Love B C, Medin D L, Gureckis T M. SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review 2004, 111(2):309-332.
38. Medin D L, Altom M W, Murphy T D. Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10(3):333-352.
39. Medin D L, Schaffer M M. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 1978, 85(3):207-238.
40. Mitchell T M, Keller R M, Kedar-Cabelli S T. Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning 1986, 1(1):47-80.
41. Murphy G L. The big book of concepts 2002, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press
42. Murphy G L, Allopenna P D. The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 1994, 20:904-919.
43. Murphy G L, Medin D L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 1985, 92:289-316.
44. Nickerson R S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many quises. Review of General Psychology 1998, 2:175-220.
45. Nokes T J, Ohlsson S. Comparing multiple paths to mastery: What is learned? Cognitive Science 2005, 29:769-796.
46. Nosofsky R M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115(1):39-57.
47. Nosofsky R M, Clark S E, Shin H J. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15(2):282-304.
48. Nosofsky R M, Palmeri T J, McKinley S C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review 1994, 101(1):53-79.
49. Patalano A L, Chin-Parker S, Ross B H. The importance of being coherent: Category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning. Journal of Memory & Language 2006, 54:407-424.
50. Posner M I, Keele S W. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 77(3):353.
51. Quine W V O, Ullian J S. The web of belief 1970, New York, Random House
52. Rittle-Johnson B. Promoting transfer: The effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development 2006, 77:1-15.
53. Rosch E, Mervis C B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7(4):573-605.
54. Roscoe R, Chi M. Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(4):534-574.
55. Roscoe R D, Chi M T H. Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science 2008, 36(4):321-350.
56. Salmon W C. Four decades of scientific explanation 1989, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press
57. Siegler R S. How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology 1995, 28:225-273.
58. Siegler R S. Microgenetic studies of self-explanations. Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning 2002, 31-58. Granott NParziale J. Eds, New York, Cambridge University Press
59. Sloman S A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:3-22.
60. Strevens M. Depth: An account of scientific explanation 2008, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
61. Wellman H M, Liu D. Causal reasoning as informed by the early development of explanations. Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation 2007, 261-279. Gopnik A, Schulz L. Eds, Oxford, England, Oxford University Press
62. Wickens T D. Elementary signal detection theory 2002, New York, Oxford University Press
63. Wisniewski E J, Medin D L. On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science 1994, 18(2):221-281.
64. Wong R M F, Lawson M J, Keeves J. The effects of self-explanation training on students' problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning & Instruction 2002, 12:233-262.
65. Woodward J. Scientific explanation. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2009 edition) 2009, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/scientific-explanation/, Zalta E N. Ed, Available at:
66. Wylie R, Koedinger K R, Mitamura T. Is self-explanation always better? The effects of adding self-explanation prompts to an English grammar tutor. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2009, 1300-1305. Taatgen N A, van Rijn H, Eds, Austin, TX, Cognitive Science Society
67. Yamauchi T, Markman A B. Learning categories composed of varying instances: The effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28(1):64-78.