When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships

Cognition

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 284-299

  Lucas, Christopher G ^a   Bridgers, Sophie ^b   Griffiths, Thomas L ^b   Gopnik, Alison ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian models; Causality; Cognitive development

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADULT; CAUSALITY; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE;

EID: 84894358152     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Carey S. The origin of concepts 2009, Oxford University Press, USA.
3. Cheng P. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review 1997, 104:367-405.
4. Dewar K.M., Xu F. Induction, overhypothesis, and the origin of abstract knowledge evidence from 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21(12):1871-1877.
5. Dias M.G., Harris P.L. The influence of the imagination on reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1990, 8:305-318.
6. German T.P., Defeyter M.A. Immunity to functional fixedness in young children. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2000, 7(4):707-712.
7. Goodman N. Fact, fiction, and forecast 1955, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
8. Gopnik A., Glymour C., Sobel D., Schulz L., Kushnir T., Danks D. A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1-31.
9. Gopnik A., Meltzoff A.N. Words, thoughts, and theories 1997, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Gopnik A., Schulz L. Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(8):371-377.
11. Gopnik A., Schulz L. Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation 2007, Oxford University Press, USA.
12. Gopnik A., Wellman H.M. Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory. Psychological Bulletin 2012, 138(6):1085-1108. 10.1037/a0028044.
13. Griffiths T.L., Tenenbaum J.B. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 51:354-384.
14. Gweon H., Schulz L. 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science 2011, 332(6037):1524.
15. Kemp C., Perfors A., Tenenbaum J. Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science 2007, 10(3):307-321.
16. Kuhl P.K. Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(11):831-843.
17. Kushnir T., Gopnik A. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology 2007, 43(1):186-196.
18. Lieder, F., Griffiths, T., & Goodman, N. (2012). Burn-in, bias, and the rationality of anchoring. In P. Bartlett, F. C. N. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 25, pp. 2699-2707).
19. Lu H., Yuille A.L., Liljeholm M., Cheng P.W., Holyoak K.J. Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological Review 2008, 115(4):955-984.
20. Lucas C., Griffiths T. Learning the form of causal relationships using hierarchical Bayesian models. Cognitive Science 2010, 34(1):113-147.
21. Lucas, C., Gopnik, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 28-52).
22. Markovits H., Vachon R. Conditional reasoning, representation, and level of abstraction. Developmental Psychology 1990, 26(6):942-951.
23. Pascalis O., Scott L.S., Kelly D., Shannon R., Nicholson E., Coleman M., et al. Plasticity of face processing in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(14):5297-5300.
24. Schulz L.E., Bonawitz E.B., Griffiths T.L. Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers' causal inferences. Developmental Psychology 2007, 43(5):1124-1139.
25. Schulz L.E., Goodman N.D., Tenenbaum J.B., Jenkins A.C. Going beyond the evidence: Abstract laws and preschoolers' responses to anomalous data. Cognition 2008, 109(2):211-223.
26. Seiver E., Gopnik A., Goodman N.D. Did she jump because she was the big sister or because the trampoline was safe? Causal inference and the development of social attribution. Child Development 2012, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01865.
27. Sobel D.M., Kirkham N.Z. Bayes nets and babies: infants' developing statistical reasoning abilities and their representation of causal knowledge. Developmental Science 2007, 10(3):298-306.
28. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction 1998, Cambridge University Press.
29. Tenenbaum J.B., Kemp C., Griffiths T.L., Goodman N.D. How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 2011, 331(6022):1279-1285. 10.1126/science.1192788.
30. Thompson-Schill S.L., Ramscar M., Chrysikou E.G. Cognition without control when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18(5):259-263.
31. Wellman H.M., Gelman S.A. Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology 1992, 43:337-375.
32. Rational constructivism in cognitive development 2013, Elsevier Inc.: Academic Press. F. Xu, T. Kushnir (Eds.).