Prediction of allosteric sites and mediating interactions through bond-to-bond propensities

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Amor, B R C ^a   Schaub, M T ^a,b   Yaliraki, S N ^a   Barahona, M ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEY PROTEIN; INTERLEUKIN 1BETA CONVERTING ENZYME; RAS PROTEIN;

BIOLOGICAL METHOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BOND TO BOND PROPENSITY; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; PREDICTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84984620737     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12477     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Monod, J., Changeux, J.-P., & Jacob., F. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. J. Mol. Biol. 6, 306-329 (1963).
2. Perutz, M. F. Mechanisms of cooperativity and allosteric regulation in proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 22, 139-237 (1989).
3. Nussinov, R., & Tsai., C.-J. Allostery in disease and in drug discovery. Cell 153, 293-305 (2013).
4. Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G., & Wolynes., P. G. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254, 1598-1603 (1991).
5. Henzler-Wildman, K., & Kern, D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450, 964-972 (2007).
6. Volkman, B. F., Lipson, D., Wemmer, D. E., & Kern, D. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Sci. Signal. 291, 2429 (2001).
7. Gunasekaran, K., Ma, B., & Nussinov., R. Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? Proteins 57, 433-443 (2004).
8. Hardy, J. A., & Wells, J. A. Searching for new allosteric sites in enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 706-715 (2004).
9. Lockless, S. W., & Ranganathan, R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286, 295-299 (1999).
10. Grant, B. J. et al. Novel allosteric sites on Ras for lead generation. PLoS ONE 6, e25711 (2011).
11. Ota, N., & Agard, D. A. Intramolecular signaling pathways revealed by modeling anisotropic thermal diffusion. J Mol. Biol. 351, 345-354 (2005).
12. Demerdash, O. N., Daily, M. D., & Mitchell, J. C. Structure-based predictive models for allosteric hot spots. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000531 (2009).
13. Panjkovich, A., & Daura, X. Exploiting protein flexibility to predict the location of allosteric sites. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 273 (2012).
14. Collier, G., & Ortiz, V. Emerging computational approaches for the study of protein allostery. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 538, 6-15 (2013).
15. Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J. P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88-118 (1965).
16. Koshland, Jr. D. E., Nemethy, G., & Filmer, D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 5, 365-385 (1966).
17. Hilser, V. J., Wrabl, J. O., & Motlagh, H. N. Structural and energetic basis of allostery. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 41, 585-609 (2012).
18. del Sol, A., Tsai, C. J., Ma, B., & Nussinov., R. The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. Structure 17, 1042-1050 (2009).
19. Zhuravlev, P. I., & Papoian, G. A. Protein functional landscapes, dynamics, allostery: a tortuous path towards a universal theoretical framework. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43, 295-332 (2010).
20. Müller-Werkmeister, H. M., & Bredenbeck., J. A donor-Acceptor pair for the real time study of vibrational energy transfer in proteins. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 3261-3266 (2014).
21. Li, G., Magana, D., & Dyer, R. B. Anisotropic energy flow and allosteric ligand binding in albumin. Nat. Commun. 5, 3100 (2014).
22. Martnez, L., Figueira, A. C. M., Webb, P., Polikarpov, I., & Skaf, M. S. Mapping the intramolecular vibrational energy flow in proteins reveals functionally important residues. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2073-2078 (2011).
23. Fujii, N., Mizuno, M., Ishikawa, H., & Mizutani, Y. Observing vibrational energy flow in a protein with the spatial resolution of a single amino acid residue. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3269-3273 (2014).
24. Nguyen, P. H., Derreumaux, P., & Stock, G. Energy flow and long-range correlations in guanine-binding riboswitch: a nonequilibrium molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 9340-9347 (2009).
25. Gnanasekaran, R., Agbo, J. K., & Leitner, D. M. Communication maps computed for homodimeric hemoglobin: computational study of water-mediated energy transport in proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 065103 (2011).
26. Gerek, Z. N., & Ozkan, S. B. Change in allosteric network affects binding affinities of PDZ domains: analysis through perturbation response scanning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002154 (2011).
27. Kaya, C., Armutlulu, A., Ekesan, S., & Haliloglu, T. MCPath: Monte Carlo path generation approach to predict likely allosteric pathways and functional residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W249-W255 (2013).
28. Nakayama, T., Yakubo, K., & Orbach, R. L. Dynamical properties of fractal networks: Scaling, numerical simulations, and physical realizations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 381 (1994).
29. Leitner, D. M. Energy flow in proteins. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59, 233-259 (2008).
30. Del Sol, A., Fujihashi, H., Amoros, D., & Nussinov, R. Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0019 (2006).
31. Del Sol, A. et al. Modular architecture of protein structures and allosteric communications: potential implications for signaling proteins and regulatory linkages. Genome Biol. 8, R92 (2007).
32. Chennubhotla, C., & Bahar, I. Signal propagation in proteins and relation to equilibrium fluctuations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e172 (2007).
33. Amitai, G. et al. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J. Mol. Biol. 344, 1135-1146 (2004).
34. Ghosh, A., & Vishveshwara., S. A study of communication pathways in methionyl-tRNA synthetase by molecular dynamics simulations and structure network analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15711 (2007).
35. Sethi, A., Eargle, J., Black, A. A., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. Dynamical networks in tRNA: protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6620 (2009).
36. Ribeiro, A. A., & Ortiz, V. Determination of signaling pathways in proteins through network theory: importance of the topology. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 1762-1769 (2014).
37. Ribeiro, A. A., & Ortiz, V. Energy propagation and network energetic coupling in proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 1835-1846 (2015).
38. Delmotte, A., Tate, E. W., Yaliraki, S. N., & Barahona, M. Protein multi-scale organization through graph partitioning and robustness analysis: application to the myosin-myosin light chain interaction. Phys. Biol. 8, 055010 (2011).
39. Amor, B., Yaliraki, S. N., Woscholski, R., & Barahona, M. Uncovering allosteric pathways in caspase-1 using Markov transient analysis and multiscale community detection. Mol. Biosyst. 10, 2247-2258 (2014).
40. Schaub, M. T., Lehmann, J., Yaliraki, S. N., & Barahona, M. Structure of complex networks: quantifying edge-to-edge relations by failure-induced flow redistribution. Netw. Sci. 2, 66-89 (2014).
41. Spielman, D. A., & Teng, S.-H. in Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 81-90 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004).
42. Kelner, J. A., Orecchia, L., Sidford, A., & Zhu., Z. A. in Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 911-920. (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013).
43. Koenker., R. Quantile Regression (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
44. Yu, K., Lu, Z., & Stander, J. Quantile regression: applications and current research areas. J. R. Stat. Soc. 52, 331-350 (2003).
45. Datta, D., Scheer, J. M., Romanowski, M. J., & Wells., J. A. An allosteric circuit in caspase-1. J. Mol. Biol. 381, 1157-1167 (2008).
46. Cook, R. D. Influential observations in linear regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 169-174 (1979).
47. Dyer, C. M., & Dahlquist, F. W. Switched or not?: the structure of unphosphorylated CheY bound to the N terminus of FliM. J. Bacteriol. 188, 7354-7363 (2006).
48. Lee, S.-Y. et al. Crystal structure of activated CheY comparison with other activated receiver domains. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16425-16431 (2001).
49. McDonald, L. R., Boyer, J. A., & Lee, A. L. Segmental motions, not a two-state concerted switch, underlie allostery in CheY. Structure 20, 1363-1373 (2012).
50. Bourret, R. B., Drake, S. K., Chervitz, S. A., Simon, M. I., & Falke, J. J. Activation of the phosphosignaling protein CheY. II. Analysis of activated mutants by 19F NMR and protein engineering. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13089-13096 (1993).
51. Smith, J. G. et al. Investigation of the role of electrostatic charge in activation of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY. J. Bacteriol. 185, 6385-6391 (2003).
52. McDonald, L. R., Whitley, M. J., Boyer, J. A., & Lee, A. L. Colocalization of fast and slow timescale dynamics in the allosteric signaling protein CheY. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 2372-2381 (2013).
53. McCormick., F. Ras-related proteins in signal transduction and growth control. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 42, 500-506 (1995).
54. Buhrman, G., Holzapfel, G., Fetics, S., & Mattos, C. Allosteric modulation of Ras positions Q61 for a direct role in catalysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4931-4936 (2010).
55. Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia., C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536-540 (1995).
56. Daily, M. D., & Gray, J. J. Allosteric communication occurs via networks of tertiary and quaternary motions in proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000293 (2009).
57. Zhu, X., Amsler, C. D., Volz, K., & Matsumura., P. Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178, 4208-4215 (1996).
58. Bellsolell, L., Cronet, P., Majolero, M., Serrano, L., & Coll, M. The threedimensional structure of two mutants of the signal transduction protein CheY suggest its molecular activation mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 257, 116-128 (1996).
59. Buchli, B. et al. Kinetic response of a photoperturbed allosteric protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11725-11730 (2013).
60. Chung, F., & Yau, S.-T. Discrete Green's functions. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 91, 191-214 (2000).
61. Reuveni, S., Granek, R., & Klafter, J. Anomalies in the vibrational dynamics of proteins are a consequence of fractal-like structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13696-13700 (2010).
62. Biggs, N. Algebraic Graph Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
63. Koutis, I., Miller, G. L., & Peng., R. in IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 590-598 (Palm Springs, CA, 2011).
64. Koenker, R. quantreg: Quantile Regression, 2015. R package version 5.19. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg.
65. Efron, B., & Tibshirani., R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (CRC press, 1994).
66. Mayo, S. L., Olafson, B. D., & Goddard, W. A. DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 8897-8909 (1990).
67. Lin, M. S., Fawzi, N. L., & Head-Gordon, T. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction. Structure 15, 727-740 (2007).
68. Yang, L.-W. et al. oGNM: online computation of structural dynamics using the Gaussian Network Model. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W24-W31 (2006).
69. Case, D. A. et al. AMBER 2015 (University of California, 2015).
70. Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545-1614 (2009).