Is group membership necessary for understanding generalized prejudice? A re-evaluation of why prejudices are interrelated

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 367-395

  Bergh, Robin ^a,b   Akrami, Nazar ^b   Sidanius, Jim ^a   Sibley, Chris G ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Generalized prejudice; Ingroup biases; Personality; Power; Status

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONALITY; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL HIERARCHY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONALITY; PREJUDICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84983739133     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000064     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.
2. Agnew, C. R., Thompson, V. D., & Gaines, S. O. (2000). Incorporating proximal and distal influences on prejudice: Testing a general model across outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 403-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266001
3. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Araya, T. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 521-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<521::AID-EJSP5>3.0.CO;2-N
4. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Bergh, R. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22, 57-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390384
5. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Bergh, R., Dahlstrand, E., & Malmsten, S. (2009). Prejudice: The person in the situation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 890-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.007
6. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Claesson, M., & Sonnander, K. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 605-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.003
7. Allison, D. B., Basile, V. C., & Yuker, H. E. (1991). The measurement of attitudes toward and beliefs about obese persons. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 599-607.
8. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
9. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
10. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 30. Authoritarian personality (pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Amiot, C. E., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2005). Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 581-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.238
12. Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800
13. Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 340, 324-340.
14. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
15. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humilityrelated criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006
16. Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10
17. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
18. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 290-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
19. Bergh, R. (2013). Prejudiced personalities revisited: On the nature of (generalized) prejudice (Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden). Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?searchId=1&pid=diva2:662373
20. Bergh, R., & Akrami, N. (in press). Generalized prejudice-Old Wisdom and New Perspectives. In C. Sibley & F. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2010). Social identity and prejudiced personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 317-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.026
22. Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2012a). The personality underpinnings of explicit and implicit generalized prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 614-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550611432937
23. Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2012b). The compatibility of personality and social identity processes: The effect of gender identity on neuroticism. European Journal of Personality, 26, 175-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.851
24. Bergman, H. (2003). NEO-PI-R: Manual-Svensk version [NEO-PI-R: Manual-Swedish version.]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget.
25. Bierly, M. M. (1985). Prejudice toward contemporary outgroups as a generalized attitude. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 189-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02344.x
26. Bizumic, B., Duckitt, J., Popadic, D., Dru, V., & Krauss, S. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 871-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.589
27. Brandt, M. J., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., Wetherell, G., & Reyna, C. (2015). Bounded openness: The effect of openness to experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 549-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000055
28. Bratt, C. (2005). The structure of attitudes toward non-Western immigrant groups: Second-order factor analysis of attitudes among Norwegian adolescents. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 447-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430205056470
29. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
30. Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice. Its social psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
31. Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29, 17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1978
32. Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24, 140-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447820
33. Christ, O., Schmid, K., Lolliot, S., Swart, H., Stolle, D., Tausch, N., ... Hewstone, M. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3996-4000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320901111
34. Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
35. Cliffordson, C. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00268
36. Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.545
37. Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe-Hargrave, N., & Riemann, R. (2012). Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: Evidence from peerreport data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 343-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028706
38. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
39. Crandall, C. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and selfinterest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882
40. Crandall, C. S., Ferguson, M. A., & Bahns, A. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In C. Stangor & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 53-70). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
41. Crawford, J. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
42. Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology, 35, 841-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
43. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
44. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., ... Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935
45. Cunningham, W. A., Nezlek, J. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1332-1346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264654
46. Davidov, E., Thörner, S., Schmidt, P., Gosen, S., & Wolf, C. (2011). Level and change of group-focused enmity in Germany: Unconditional and conditional latent growth curve models with four panel waves. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 95, 481-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10182-011-0174-1
47. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
48. Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214
49. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084-1121). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029
50. Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791588
51. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
52. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.614
53. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (in press). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on the psychology of prejudice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
54. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 17-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch2
55. Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable-and a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.494
56. Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2007). Personality and prejudice: From Big Five personality factors to facets. Journal of Personality, 75, 899-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00460.x
57. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., & Araya, T. (2000). Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 307-314. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11131952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00203
58. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right-Wing Authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.526
59. Ekehammar, B., Bergh, R., & Akrami, N. (2013). Person-positivity bias in sexual prejudice: Distinguishing between attitudes to homosexuality, gays, and lesbians. Unpublished manuscript.
60. Fallon, A. E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.94.1.102
61. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
62. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
63. Flynn, F. J. (2005). Having an open mind: The impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 816-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.816
64. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
65. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
67. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
68. Gray, K., Rand, D. G., Ert, E., Lewis, K., Hershman, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). The emergence of "us and them" in 80 lines of code: Modeling group genesis in homogeneous populations. Psychological Science, 25, 982-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614521816
69. Graziano, W. G., Bruce, J., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Attraction, personality, and prejudice: Liking none of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 565-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.565
70. Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person x Situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
71. Grina, J., Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Sidanius, J. (2016). Political orientation and dominance: Are people on the political right more dominant? Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 113-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.015
72. Hartley, E. L. (1946). Problems in prejudice. New York, NY: Kings Crown.
73. Hodson, G. (2009). The puzzling person-situation schism in prejudice research. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 247-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.035
74. Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
75. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
76. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
77. Kam, C. D., & Kinder, D. R. (2012). Ethnocentrism as a short-term force in the 2008 American presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 326-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00564.x
78. Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2009). Us against them. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226435725.001.0001
79. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
80. Krauss, S. W. (2002). Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1255-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812010
81. Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187-208.
82. LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
83. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
84. Lo, W. S., Ho, S. Y., Mak, K. K., & Lam, T. H. (2012). The use of Stunkard's figure rating scale to identify underweight and overweight in Chinese adolescents. PLoS ONE, 7, e50017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050017
85. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
86. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2015). Intergroup emotions. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2: Group processes (pp. 263-293) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14342-010
87. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91-126). New York, NY: Academic Press.
88. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323
89. McFarland, S. G. (2001). Prejudiced people: Individual differences in explicit prejudice. Unpublished manuscript.
90. McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x
91. McFarland, S., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Vancouver, Canada.
92. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V., & Abalakina-Paap, M. (1993). The authoritarian personality in the United States and the Former Soviet Union: Comparative studies. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strengths and weaknesses: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 199-225). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_10
93. Meeusen, C., & Dhont, K. (2015). Parent-child similarity in common and specific components of prejudice: The role of ideological attitudes and political discussion. European Journal of Personality, 29, 585-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2011
94. Meeusen, C., & Kern, A. (2016). The relation between societal factors and different forms of prejudice: A cross-national approach on targetspecific and generalized prejudice. Social Science Research, 55, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.009
95. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
96. Muthén, B. O. (2005). Mplus discussion-structural equation modeling-correcting for measurement error. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/11/645.html?1364322909.
97. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
98. Nosek, B., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6, 101-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101
99. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524
100. Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200104
101. Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
102. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
103. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
104. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Bizumic, B., & Subasic, E. (2007). Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 517-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466606X153080
105. Ring, J., & Morgentau, S. (2005). Intolerance: Antisemitic, homophobic, Islamophobic and anti-immigrant tendencies among young people. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
106. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men's and women's sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26, 350-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.843
107. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
108. Roth, M., & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of Big-Five types and traits in the prediction of social attitudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.138
109. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
110. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
111. Sibley, C. G. (2009). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2009: Questionnaire items and details for researchers. Unpublished Tech. Rep. No., The University of Auckland.
112. Sibley, C. G. (2014). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. NZAVS Technical Documents, e01.
113. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A metaanalysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
114. Sibley, C. G., & Greaves, L. M. (2014). NZAVS content rotation and planning document. NZAVS Technical Documents, e02.
115. Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.750
116. Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Moberly, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., ... Robertson, A. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142-159.
117. Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1
118. Sibley, C. G., Stewart, K., Houkamau, C., Manuela, S., Perry, R., Wootton, L., ... Asbrock, F. (2011). Ethnic group stereotypes in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 25-36.
119. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
120. Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (in press). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on the psychology of prejudice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n47
121. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
122. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711378
123. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
124. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Stunkard, A. J., Sørensen, T., & Schulsinger, F. (1983). Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Research Publications-Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 60, 115-120.
126. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
127. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
128. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
129. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
130. von Collani, G., & Grumm, M. (2009). On the dimensional structure of personality, ideological beliefs, social attitudes, and personal values. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 107-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.2.107
131. Wright, L. W., Jr., Adams, H. E., & Bernat, J. (1999). Development and validation of the Homophobia Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 337-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022172816258
132. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
133. Zick, A., Wolf, C., Küpper, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (2008). The syndrome of group focused enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 363-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00566.x