Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 284-298

  Crawford, Jarret T ^a  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

Ideology; Political intolerance; Political psychology; Prejudice; Threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907046287     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abelson R.P., Kinder D.R., Peters M.D., Fiske S.T. Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42:619-630.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
3. Allport G. The nature of prejudice 1954, Addison Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
4. Altemeyer B. The authoritarian specter 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Berinsky A.J., Huber G.A., Lenz G.S. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 2012, 20(3):351-368.
6. Brandt M.J., Crawford J.T. Replication-extension of 'Not for All the Tea in China!' Political Ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations (Nam, Jost, & Van Bavel, 2013, Plos One) Available at SSRN:. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2365281.
7. Brandt M.J., Reyna C., Chambers J.R., Crawford J.T., Wetherell G. The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2014, 23(1):27-34.
8. Chambers J.R., Schlenker B.R., Collisson B. Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science 2013, 24:140-149.
9. Cohrs C.J., Moschner B., Maes J., Kielmann S. The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31(10):1425-1434.
10. Cottrell C.A., Neuberg S.L. Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88(5):770-789.
11. Crawford J.T. The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48(1):138-151.
12. Crawford J.T., Jussim L., Pilanski J.M. How (not) to interpret and report main effects and interactions in multiple regression: Why Crawford and Pilanski (2013) did not actually replicate Lindner and Nosek (2009). Political Psychology 2013, 10.1111/pops.12050.
13. Crawford J.T., Modri S.A., Motyl M. Bleeding-heart liberals and hard-hearted conservatives: Subtle political dehumanization through differential attributions of human nature and human uniqueness traits. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 2013, 1(1):86-104. 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.184.
14. Crawford J.T., Pilanski J.M. Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology 2013, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x.
15. Crawford J.T., Pilanski J.M. The differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on political intolerance. Political Psychology 2014, 35(4). 10.1111/pops.12066.
16. Crawford, J. T., Wance, N. M., Brandt, M. J., Chambers, J. R., Inbar, Y., & Motyl, M. (2014). Differential effects of social and economic ideologies on political prejudice: Further evidence for the ideological conflict hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript.
17. Crawford J.T., Wiley S., Ventresco N. Examining Americans' attitudes toward drone strikes on the eve of the 2012 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2013, 10.1111/asap.12030.
18. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
19. Davis D.W., Silver B.D. Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. America Journal of Political Science 2004, 48:28-46.
20. Dovidio J.F., Esses V.M., Beach K.R., Gaertner S.L. The role of affect in determining intergroup behavior: The case of willingness to engage in intergroup affect. From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups 2002, 153-171. Psychology Press, New York. D.M. Mackie, E.R. Smith (Eds.).
21. Duarte J.L., Crawford J.T., Stern C., Haidt J., Jussim L., Tetlock P.E. Ideological diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2014, in press. 10.1017/S0140525X14000430.
22. Duckitt J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32(5):684-696.
23. Feldman S. Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology 2003, 24(1):41-74.
24. Gibson J.L. Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer's Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Perspectives on Politics 2006, 4(1):21-34.
25. Gibson J.L., Gouws A. Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in democratic persuasion 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Goodman J.K., Cryder C.E., Cheema A. Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2012, 26(3):213-224.
27. Gouws, A. (1992). A study of political tolerance in the context of South Africa (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
28. Graham J., Haidt J., Koleva S., Motyl M., Iyer R., Wojcik S., et al. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2013, 47:55-130.
29. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:1029-1046.
30. Heine S.J., Proulx T., Vohs K.D. The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivation. Personality and Social Psychological Review 2006, 10(2):88-111.
31. Hibbing J.R., Smith K.B., Alford J.R. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2014, 37(3):297-307.
32. Horton J.J., Rand D.G., Zeckhauser R.J. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 2011, 14(3):399-425.
33. Janoff-Bulman R., Sheikh S., Baldacci K.G. Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44(4):1091-1099.
34. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W., Sulloway F.J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(3):339-375.
35. Lindner N.M., Nosek B.A. Alienable speech: Ideological variations in the application of free-speech principles. Political Psychology 2009, 30(1):67-92.
36. From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups 2002, Psychology Press, New York. D.M. Mackie, E.R. Smith (Eds.).
37. Marcus G.E., Sullivan J.L., Theiss-Morse E., Wood S.L. With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments 1995, Cambridge University Press, New York.
38. Morgan G.S., Mullen E., Skitka L.J. When values and attributions collide: Liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2010, 36:1241-1254.
39. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus user's guide 1998-2012, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA. Seventh ed.
40. Nam H.H., Jost J.T., Van Bavel J.J. "Not for All the Tea in China!" Political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PloS One 2013, 8:e59837.
41. Nosek B.A., Lindner N.M. Replication actually: Comment on Crawford and Pilanski (2013). Political Psychology 2013, 10.1111/pops.12051.
42. Oppenheimer D.M., Meyvis T., Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks:Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45(4):867-872.
43. Oxley D.R., Smith K.B., Alford J.R., Hibbing M.V., Miller J.L., Scalora M., et al. Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 2008, 321(5896):1667-1670.
44. Paluck E.L. Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96(3):574-587.
45. Pettigrew T.F., Christ O., Wagner U., Meertens R.W., Van Dick R., Zick A. Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues 2008, 64(2):385-401.
46. Riek B.M., Mania E.W., Gaertner S.L. Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10(4):336-353.
47. Skitka L.J., Bauman C.W., Sargis E.G. Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:895-917.
48. Skitka L.J., Liu J.H., Yang Y., Chen H., Liu L., Xu L. Exploring the cross-cultural generalizability and scope of morally motivated intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2013, 4(3):324-331.
49. Sniderman P.M., Tetlock P.E., Glaser J.M., Green D.P., Hout M. Principled tolerance and the American mass public. British Journal of Political Science 1989, 19:25-45.
50. Solomon S., Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T. A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in experimental social psychology 1991, Vol. 24:93-159. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
51. Stenner K. The authoritarian dynamic 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
52. Stephan W.G., Stephan C.W. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Reducing prejudice and discrimination 2000, 23-45. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S. Oskamp (Ed.).
53. Strauss A., Corbin J. Grounded theory in practice 1997, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
54. Suedfeld P., Steel G.D., Schmidt P.W. Political ideology and attitudes toward censorship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1994, 24(9):765-781.
55. Sullivan J.L., Marcus G.E., Feldman S., Piereson J.E. Political tolerance: A multivariate approach. American Political Science Review 1981, 75(1):92-106.
56. Sullivan J.L., Piereson J.E., Marcus G.E. Political tolerance and American democracy 1982, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
57. Sullivan J.E., Transue J.E. The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:625-650.
58. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2013, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 6th ed.
59. van der Noll J., Poppe E., Verkuyten M. Political tolerance and prejudice: Differential reactions towards Muslims in the Netherlands. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2010, 32:46-56.
60. Velasco-Gonzalez K., Verkuyten M., Weesie J., Poppe E. Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrative threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 47(4):667-685.
61. Wetherell G., Brandt M.J., Reyna C. Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of perceptions of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychology and Personality Science 2013, 4(6):658-667.
62. Wetherell G., Reyna C., Sadler M. Public option vs. the market: Perceived value violations drive opposition to healthcare reform. Political Psychology 2013, 34:43-66.
63. Yzerbyt V.Y., Demoulin S. Intergroup relations. The handbook of social psychology 2010, Vol. 2:1024-1083. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 5th ed.