A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 98-109

  Duckitt, John ^a   Sibley, Chris G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ideology; Politics; Prejudice; Right wing authoritarianism; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749120821     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400903028540     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1981 ). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego: Academic.
4. Ashton, M., Danso, H., Maio, G., Esses, V., Bond, M., & Keung, D. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In R. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Cultural and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 10 (pp. 1-29). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeach's equality-freedom model: Two dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 67-94.
6. Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270-289.
7. Danso, H. A., & Esses, V. M. (200.1). Black experimenters and the intellectual performance of White participants: The tables are turned. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 158-165.
8. Doty, R., Peterson, B., & Winter, D. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629-640.
9. Dru, V. (2007). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: effects of various self-categorization conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 877-883.
10. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Duckitt, J. (2004). The cultural bases of ethnocentrism and prejudice. In Y.-T. Lee, C. McCauley, F. Moghaddam, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of ethnic and cultural conflict: Looking through American and global chaos or harmony (pp. 155-174). Westport, NY: Praeger.
12. Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684696.
13. Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
14. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130.
15. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual process model of ideological attitudes and system, justification. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 292-313). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Duckitt, J., Sibley, C. G., & Nasoordeen, S. (2008). Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation moder-ate the effects of immigrant characteristics on anti-immigrant attitudes. Manuscript in preparation.
17. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 75-93.
18. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march, of modern fascism.: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
19. Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the socio-political context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26, 299-320.
20. Eysenck, H. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
21. Forsyth, D. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175-184.
22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
23. Goertzel, T. (1987). Authoritarianism of personality and political attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 7-18.
24. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
25. Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., &Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice: Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
26. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Huang, L-L., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 267276.
28. Hughes, A. (1975). Psychology and the political experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Jost, J., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A., Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
30. Jugert, P., & Duckitt, J. (in press). A motivational model of authoritarianism: Testing personal and situational determinants. Political Psychology.
31. Katz, I., & Hass, R. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 55, 893-905.
32. Kerlinger, F. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Krauss, S. (2002). Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism.. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,12551264.
34. Levin, S. (2004). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 25, 31-48.
35. McCann, S. J. H. (1997). Threatening times, "strong" presidential vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824-1964. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 160-170.
36. McCann, S. J. H., & Stewin, L. L. (1990). Good and bad years: An index of American social, economic and political threat (1920-1986). Journal of Psychology, 124, 601-617.
37. McFarland, S. (1998). Toward a typology of prejudiced persons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
38. McFarland, S. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and American students' attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360367.
39. McFarland, S. (2006). Prejudiced people: Individual differences in explicit prejudice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. McFarland, S., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Vancouver, Canada.
41. Middendorp, C. (1991). Ideology in Dutch politics. Assen, the Netherlands: Van G. Corcum.
42. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
44. Roccato, M., & Ricolfi, L. (2005). On. the correlation, between rightwing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 187-200.
45. Rokeach.M. (1960). The open and the closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
46. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
47. Sales, S. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44-57.
48. Saucier, G. (1994). Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 141-154.
49. Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366-385.
50. Schmitt, M., Branscombe, N., & Kappen, D. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161186.
51. Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008a). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279.
54. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (in press-a). Big-Five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. Journal of Social Psychology.
55. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (in press-b). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology.
56. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M., & Duckitt, J. (2007a). Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160-172.
57. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M., & Duckitt, J. (2007b). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357-371.
58. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
59. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 998-1011.
60. Stangor, C., & Leary, M. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 243-281). New York: Academic.
61. Tomkins, S. (1964). The polarity scale. New York: Springer.
62. Triandis, H., & Gelfand, M. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism, and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
63. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: Brealey.
64. Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the Five-Factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21, 131-148.
65. Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2007). Contemporary attitudes and their ideological representation in Flanders (Belgium), Poland, and the Ukraine. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 1626.
66. Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). The psychology of conservatism. New York: Academic.