Personality and prejudice: From big five personality factors to facets

Journal of Personality

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 899-926

  Ekehammar, Bo ^a   Akrami, Nazar ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROL; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIAL VALUES; SWEDEN;

EID: 34548361844     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00460.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York : Norton.
2. Akrami, N. (2005). Prejudice: The interplay of personality, cognition, and social psychology. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 5. Uppsala, Sweden : University Library.
3. Akrami, N. Ekehammar, B. (2006a). Prejudice: Personality or social psychology? Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Akrami, N. Ekehammar, B. (2006b). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big-Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 117 126.
5. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B. Araya, T. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 521 532.
6. Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Claesson, M. Sonnander, K. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 605 617.
7. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
8. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Manitoba, Canada : University Press.
9. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47 92). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
10. Asendorpf, J. B. van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629 666.
11. Bergman, H. (2003). NEO-PI-R: Manual - Svensk version [NEO-PI-R: Manual - Swedish version.] Stockholm : Psykologiförlaget.
12. Bouchard, T. J. Jr. Loehlin, J. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31, 243 273.
13. Brewer, M. B. Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 554 594). New York : McGraw-Hill.
14. Clark, L. A. Watson, D. (1999). Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 399 423). New York : Guilford.
15. Costa, P. T. Jr. McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources.
16. Costa, P. T. Jr. McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21 50.
17. Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. O'Brien, L. T. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359 378.
18. Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684 696.
19. Duckitt, J. Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199 222.
20. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Du Plessis, I. Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75 93.
21. Duriez, B. Soenens, B. (2006). Personality, identity styles, and authoritarianism: An integrative study among late adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 20, 397 417.
22. Ekehammar, B. Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449 464.
23. Ekehammar, B. Akrami, N. (2006). Attitudes to homosexuality among Swedish women and men. Manuscript in preparation, Uppsala University, Sweden.
24. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N. Araya, T. (2000). Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 307 314.
25. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N. Araya, T. (2003). Gender differences in implicit prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1509 1523.
26. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big-Five personality, social dominance orientation or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463 482.
27. Eysenck, H. J. (1951). Primary social attitudes as related to social class and political party. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 198 209.
28. Eysenck, H. J. (1961). Personality and social attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 243 248.
29. Flynn, F. J. (2005). Having an open mind: The impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 816 826.
30. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26 42.
31. Graziano, W. G. Eisenberg, N. H. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795 824). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
32. Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N. Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697 721.
33. Heaven, P. C., Organ, L., Supavadeeprasit, S. Leeson, P. (2006). War and prejudice: A study in social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 599 608.
34. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66 100). New York : Guilford.
35. John, O. P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102 138). New York : Guilford Press.
36. Kreindler, S. A. (2005). A dual group process model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 90 107.
37. McAdams, D. P. Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principals for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204 217.
38. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91 126). New York : Academic Press.
39. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323 337.
40. McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51 87). New York : Guilford.
41. McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825 847). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
42. McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139 153). New York : Guilford.
43. McFarland, S. G. (2001). Prejudiced people: Individual differences in explicit prejudice. Manuscript, Western Kentucky University.
44. Mershon, B. Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 675 680.
45. Ones, D. S. Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609 626.
46. Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538 556.
47. Paunonen, S. V. Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524 539.
48. Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Försterling, F. Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 413 433.
49. Peterson, B. E., Smirles, K. A. Wentworth, P. A. (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1202 1216.
50. Plomin, R. Caspi, A. (1999). Behavior genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality research: Theory and research (pp. 251 276). New York : Guilford.
51. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A. Ryan, M. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427 434.
52. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York : Basic Books.
53. Rudmin, F. W. (1999). Norwegian short-form of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 229 233.
54. Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366 385.
55. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York : Cambridge University Press.
56. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S. Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199 214.
57. Tajfel, H. Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7 24). Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
58. Wilson, M. S. Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187 198.