Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 581-598

  Amiot, Catherine E ^a   Bourhis, Richard Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844508863     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.238     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
4. Altemeyer, B. (1994). Reducing prejudice in right-wing authoritarians. In M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 131-148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other 'authoritarian personality.' In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego: Academic.
6. Amiot, C. E., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2003). Discrimination and the positive-negative asymmetry effect: Ideological and normative processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 597-608.
7. Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1995). Perceptions of relative group size and group status: Effects on intergroup discrimination in negative evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 231-247.
8. Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1997). Normative evaluations and frequency expectations regarding positive versus negative outcome allocations between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 165-176.
9. Bourhis, R. Y., & Gagnon, A. (2001). Social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook in social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 89-111). Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Bourhis, R. Y., Gagnon, A., & Sachdev, I. (1997). Les matrices de Tajfel: Un guide méthodologique pour la recherche intergroupes [The Tajfel Matrices: a methodological guide for intergroup research]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 34, 11-28.
12. Bourhis, R. Y., Turner, J. C., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Interdependence, social identity and discrimination. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 273-295). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal group situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
14. Brown, R. J. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
15. Brown, R. J., Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Minimal group situations and intergroup discrimination: Comments on the paper by Aschenbrenner and Schaefer. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 399-414.
16. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Buhl, T. (1999). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: Meta-analytic evidence. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 51-58.
18. Christie, R. (1993). Some experimental approaches to authoritarianism: II. Authoritarianism and punitiveness. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strengths and weaknesses: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 99-143). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 263-292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20. Doise, W. (1976). L'articulation psychosociologique et les relations entre groupes [Social psychological articulation and relations between groups]. Bruxelles: A. de Boek.
21. Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
22. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-112). San Diego: Academic.
23. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
24. Duriez, B., & van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
25. Elms, A. C., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 4, 282-289.
26. Federico, C. M. (1998). The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favouritism for high status groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 119-143.
27. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London: Routledge.
28. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2001). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: Norms as moderators of the expression of in-group bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 143-154.
29. Gagnon, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289-1301.
30. Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
31. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
32. Lippa, R., & Arad S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
33. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
34. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
35. Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
36. Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
37. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In M. Hewstone, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 107-143). Chichester: Wiley.
38. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Gruenert, G. H., Kessler, S., Lettgen, S., & Schaferhoff, S. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144.
39. Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, M. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581.
40. Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1998). Social identification, interdependence, and discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 49-66.
41. Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92-103.
42. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). New York: Academic.
43. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
44. Reynolds, S., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64-80.
45. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
46. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338-366.
48. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
49. Statistiques Canada. (1999). Le Canada en statistiques: Recensement de 1996 [Canada in statistics: The 1996 census] (No. 72F0002-XDF). Ottawa: Canada.
50. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
51. Tajfel, H., Rament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
52. Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1995). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.
53. Turner, J. C. (1980). Fairness or discrimination in intergroup behaviour? A reply to Branthwaite, Doyle, and Lightbown. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 131-147.
54. Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on ... 'the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm.' European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
55. Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.