Implementation of formative assessment–effects of quality of programme delivery on students’ mathematics achievement and interest

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 160-182

  Pinger, Petra ^a   Rakoczy, Katrin ^a   Besser, Michael ^b   Klieme, Eckhard ^a  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

achievement; feedback; Formative assessment; implementation; mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84980334556     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1170665     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ames, C., (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T., (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238. doi:10.3102/00346543061002213
3. Bennett, R. E., (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
4. Besser, M., Blum, W., & Klimczak, M., (2013). Formative assessment in every-day teaching of mathematical modelling: Implementation of written and oral feedback to competency-oriented tasks. In G. A., Stillman, G., Kaiser, W., Blum, & J. P., Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 469–478). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
7. Bloomhoj, M., & Jensen, T. H., (2007). What’s all the fuss about competencies? Experiences with using a competence perspective on mathematics education to develop the teaching of mathematical modelling. In W., Blum, P. L., Galbraith, H.-W., Henn, & M., Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI study (Vol. 10, pp. 45–56). New York, NY: Springer.
8. Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M., (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education–Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 149–171.10.1023/A:1022435827400
9. Cianci, A. M., Schaubroeck, J. M., & McGill, G. A., (2010). Achievement goals, feedback, and task performance. Human Performance, 23, 131–154. doi:10.1080/08959281003621687
10. Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. E., (1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159–179. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
11. Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., … Hardy, I., (2015). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting students’ science understanding? American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1133–1159. doi:10.3102/0002831215596412
12. Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shemwell, J. T., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Shavelson, R. J., & Yin, Y., (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360–389. doi:10.1080/08957340802347852
13. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E., (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34, 269–290. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785384
14. Hattie, J., (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
16. Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E., (2015). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy & Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1049113
17. Huth, K., (2004). Entwicklung und Evaluation von fehlerspezifischem informativem tutoriellem Feedback (ITF) für die schriftliche Subtraktion [Development and Evaluation of bug-related tutoring feedback for written substraction] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/1243/1105354057406-4715.pdf
18. Kingston, N., & Nash, B., (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28–37. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
19. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K., (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T., Janik & T., Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.
20. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A., (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.119.2.254
21. Köller, O., (2005). Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of the empirical German literature. In OECD (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 265–279). Paris: OECD.
22. Krampen, G., (1987). Differential effects of teacher comments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 137–146. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.137
23. Krapp, A., (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23–40.10.1007/BF03173109
24. Krapp, A., (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
25. Krapp, A., (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007
26. Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M., (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
27. Kulhavy, R. W., White, M. T., Topp, B. W., Chan, A. L., & Adams, J., (1985). Feedback complexity and corrective efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 285–291. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(85)90025-6
28. Kunter, M., (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht [Multiple goals in Mathematics instruction]. Münster: Waxmann.
29. Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D., (2011). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 523–539. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9344-x
30. Leiss, D., Schukajlow, S., Blum, W., Messner, R., & Pekrun, R., (2010). The role of the situation model in mathematical modelling–Task analyses, student competencies, and teacher interventions. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31, 119–141.10.1007/s13138-010-0006-y
31. Maaß, K., (2006). What are modelling competencies? Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 38(2), 113–142.
32. Maaß, K., (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31, 285–311. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0010-2
33. Meyer, W.-U., (1982). Indirect communications about perceived ability estimates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 888–897.10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.888
34. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O., (1998–2012). Mplus (Version 7) [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
35. Narciss, S., & Huth, K., (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 16, 310–322. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003
36. Niss, M., (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The danish KOM project. In A., Gagatsis & S., Papastavridis (Eds.), Mediterranean conference on mathematical education (pp. 115–124). Athen: 3rd Hellenic Mathematical Society and Cyprus Mathematical Society.
37. O’Donnell, C. L., (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793
38. Rakoczy, K., Buff, A., & Lipowsky, F., (2005). Befragungsinstrumente [Questionnaires]. In E., Klieme, C., Pauli, & K., Reusser (Eds.), Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch- deutschen Videostudie ‚Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis.’ Materialien zur Bildungsforschung [Documentation of the instruments of the Swiss-German video study ‘Instructional quality, learning patterns, and mathematical understanding.’ Materials on educational research] (Vol. 13, pp. 109–111). Frankfurt am Main: GFPF.
39. Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J., (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002
40. Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Leiss, D., & Blum, W., (in press). Formative assessment in mathematics instruction: Theoretical considerations and empirical results of the Co²CA project. In D., Leutner, J., Fleischer, J., Grünkorn, & E., Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education: Research, models, and instruments. Berlin: Springer.
41. Rheinberg, F., (2006). Bezugsnorm-Orientierung [Reference orientation]. In D. H., Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie [Handbook of educational psychology] (3rd ed., pp. 55–62). Weinheim: Beltz.
42. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
43. Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Yin, Y., (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295–314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647
44. Shih, S., & Alexander, J., (2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other-referenced feedback on children’s development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 536–543. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.536
45. Shute, V., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
46. Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R., & Hiebert, J., (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from. Educational Psychologist, 35, 87–100.
47. Tierney, R. D., (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education, 13, 239–264. doi:10.1080/09695940601035387
48. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M., (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A., Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment. Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–84). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R., (1998). ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.